“highly significant”

Results Range dynamics After removing the possible effects of geography, the difference in the current climatic niches of cinerea and coryphaeus was highly significant (PC1 climate : F 4, 53 = 24.77, P < 0.001; PC2 climate : F 4, 53 = 25.94, P < 0.001).

These results are confirmed by the ANOVA analysis which showed a very highly significant difference between the three treatments ( p ≤ 0.001) ( Figure 3(b) ).

Statistical analysis (mixed ANOVA) of cycle length across time with direction of change as main factor shows no main effects but a highly significant interaction (p<0.001) indicating a different pattern of change across time for each of the groups.

When compared to the death group, we found a highly significant difference for aCCI ( P = 0.0010) and preoperative ALT ( P = 0.014).

The difference in mean concentration of LA between the dietary treatment groups was less than 10% (15.5 g/100 g fat and 16.4 g/100 g fat) but the difference between the groups was highly significant (P = 0.001) [ 3 ].

While in the group BH100 a relative ECL of -9.69 ± 4.81 (± 2.52) % was not significant ( p = 1.000) when compared to the control group, the groups BH125 (-19.44 ± 7.30 (± 3.82) %) and even more BH150 (-21.99 ± 6.70 (± 3.51) %) both suffered a highly significant increased relative ECL ( p < 0.001).

It contains 3.564 folds more risk of developing cervical cancer with a highly significant P value (adjusted OR = 3.564, 95% CI = 1.647–7.713, P = 0.001).

The effect of generation on this parameter was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001).

aeruginosa were pooled, highly significant mutual inhibition of biofilm formation was noted ( Candida P < 0.001, P. aeruginosa P < 0.01).

3.4 Predictors of high BP among the study population The univariate analysis shows highly significant ( P < .001) association for most of the risk factors of high BP (Table S1 ).

The analysis of variance showed a highly significant difference for the interaction of the factors cultivar, sampling time, and explant type used for hazelnut micropropagation ( p = 0.001).

These three percentages were highly significantly different (χ 2 = 19.7; P < 0.001), with a highly significant linear trend ( P < 0.001).

The ex vivo epithelial cell adhesion assay results indicated a highly significant reduction in bacterial adhesion to T24 cells compared to placebo (p < 0.001) following the consumption of cranberry dosages containing 36 or 72 mg of PAC (Table 1 , Figure 1 ).

Secondary Outcomes All PROs demonstrated highly significant improvements at the final follow-up compared with 2 preoperative baselines ( P < .001) ( Table 3 , Figure 4 ).

The highly significant difference occurs in the surface soil (p<0.001), with the range of changes under drip irrigation being smaller than that under flood irrigation.

Moreover heterogeneity across the studies was found to be highly significant (p<0.001, I 2 = 95%).

Our results showed a highly significant positive correlation (p < 0.001, R 2 = 1.00) between both methods, confirming the accuracy of the differential gene expression patterns identified here and also our selection of reference genes ( Fig 6 , S1 Text ).

Significant relationship was denoted by a P value less than 0.05 ( P > 0.05 [not significant], P < 0.05 [significant], P < 0.01 [highly significant], and P < 0.001 [very highly significant]).

MHco3/18.F 1 observed heterozygote frequency of 15 (13.6 expected according to HWE) at codon 167 was not significant but at codon 200 was highly significant (χ 2 = 66.47, p < 0.001) with 77 observed heterozygotes (40 expected).

There was a highly significant correlation between HbA1c and FPG, as shown in Figure 1 (r 2 =0.86; P <0.001).

Even after controlling for the state fixed effects, the positive effect of the peer score—the average transparency score of all other hospitals in the same HRR—remained highly significant (0.42; P < 0.001).

Prevalence rates were found to be 11.1% at age 8, 12.3% at the age of 9, 17.1% at the age of 10, 19% at age 11, and 40.5% at the age of 12 years; it was noted that the difference was statistically highly significant ( χ 2 = 141.93, p -value ≤ 0.001**) ( Fig. 1 ).

DMRs in SAS fish were twice as frequently hypo-methylated relative to wild fish than hyper-methylated and this difference was highly significant (68%: 193/284 hypo-DMRs; 32%: 91/284 hyper-DMRs; binomial P -value < 0.001).

The CD4 depletion remained highly significant in the duodenum of virally suppressed participants ( P < 0.001), but it was less pronounced in the colon and no longer reached statistical significance ( P = 0.1).

Thus, we observed weak enrichment of strain-specific variants at sex-biased CREs when considering the full eQTL regions, but found a highly significant, 2.5-fold enrichment within intra-TAD intervals (p<0.001 for intra-TAD interval variants vs p = 0.278 genome-wide).