“highly significant”

The directional asymmetry is highly significant at 19–27 Hz(Wilcoxon signed rank test, p < 0.001 at each frequency).

This difference was found to be highly significant ( P = 0.001).

For both horizontal and vertical pairs, this effect was highly significant (α 1 : r 38 = 0.62, p < 0.001, BF = 1442.37; α 2 r 38 = 0.68, p < 0.001, BF = 13370; Figures 4 G and 4 H), while for diagonal pairs, it was weaker and marginally significant ( r 38 = 0.31, p = 0. 051 , BF = 1.241 , Figure 4 I).

Moreover, small-seeded soybeans germinated under light conditions showed highly significant differences ( p > 0.001).

Depression was found in 36.7% of all subjects (10% mild, 13.3% moderate, 13.3% severe depression) with a non-significant difference between men and women ( p = 0.611) but with a highly significant difference ( p = 0.001) compared to the HCG with only 6.25% (5.2% mild, 0.5% moderate and 0.5% severe) Half of the subjects with Middle Eastern ethnic origin showed signs of depression, while only 24% of subjects with Caucasian origin did (Fig. 1 ).

The difference in the rate of viral coinfections was highly significant ( p < 0.001, t test). 3.2.

The analysis observed a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) in the means of the mTUG duration when compared between LSS levels 7 and 8 as shown in Table 1 and represented in Figure 2 .

Compared with healthy mice, sensitization with HDM led to a highly significant increase in total immune cell numbers of asthmatic mice (PBS: 0.18 ± 0.05 × 10 6 cells/mL; HDM: 1.34 ± 0.16 × 10 6 cells/mL, p < 0.001) with eosinophils from 0.00 ± 0.00% to 57.45 ± 1.84% ( p < 0.001).

There was a very strong and highly significant correlation (r = 0.905, p < 0.001; Spearman test, Fig. 1 ) between the actual INR and estimated INR values, with a maximum difference in INR of 0.2 units, which is not clinically significant.

The association between coronary risk and interaction between metabolic syndrome and NAFLD was highly significant ( p value < 0.001).

Stratifying by age, the difference in the proportion of children with a TOS < 4 was highly significant between sCMV and CTL in children 7–10 years of age (91.2% and 18.7%, P < 0.001), but not in younger children (Fig. 3 d).

In addition, some highly significant correlations ( P < 0.001) were found, such as those between the total SDQ score and sleep onset delay and the total CSHQ score.

In the left hemisphere, there was no significant main effect of species ( F (1, 179)=1.38, p=0.47), but a highly significant main effect of tract ( F (4, 792)=565.00, p<0.001) and a highly significant interaction effect of species and tract ( F (4, 792)=207.73, p<0.001).

Notably, across all three utilisation categories, cumulative pre-baseline events remained a highly significant predictor of post-baseline utilisation ( P < 0.001).

Frontal regions increased the number and strength of the incoming connections during induction, with a highly significant change of in-strength index (Bas-Ind1: p < 0.001; Bas-Ind2: p = 0.037; Bas-Rec1: p < 0.001; Ind1-Rec1: p = 0.01), and of in-degree values (Bas-Ind1: p = 0.01; Bas-Rec1: p = 0.003).

All estimated slopes were highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that higher LW values were generally associated with higher estimated nutrient intake.

A significant result was defined as p<0.05 and highly significant as p<0.001.

Similarly, germination rates presented highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between germplasm groups with 80%, 63%, and 59% average germination for commercial cultivars, landraces and genebank accessions, respectively ( Table 2 ).

Furthermore, also the TNM-categories showed a highly significant correlation with the 5-year OS: a high pT category and positive lymph node (pN) status predicted a worse 5-year OS with high significance ( p < 0.001).

The same results were recorded for obesity but for only girls with a highly significant difference (( P < 0.001).

Similarly, when greater numbers of whitefly (80) were used, a highly significant preference ( p < 0.001) for the commercial tomato species was observed (Fig. 3a ).

At week 18, the comparison of median titers where subjects received 2 doses of fIPV at 6 and 14 weeks with those who received 2 doses fIPV at 10 and 14 weeks were 57 (45-72) and 23 (18-28), respectively, and this difference was highly significant ( P < .001).

The peel‐off method consistently outperformed both the activity and deflation methods with highly significant differences ( P < 0.001 for peel‐off vs . activity; P < 0.001 for peel‐off vs . deflation).

Statistical analysis revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between the chemical treatment and the combined release treatment compared with the single release treatments, the organic insecticide treatment, and the untreated control at D9, D10, D11, D12, D13, D14, D15 and D16.

One-way ANOVA demonstrated highly significant differences among the three groups for all markers ( p < 0.001).