“highly significant”

Examination of immune-stained sections of different research groups revealed strong positive expression of p-STAT3, cyclin D1, and Bcl-2 in the DEN group with a highly significant increase ( p < 0.001) compared to the control group.

The meta-analysis indicated a highly significant association between BsmI and the risk of MM for the homozygote model (OR 1.918, 95% CI 1.293, 2.844; P = 0.001; Fig. 4 b) and heterozygous model (OR 1.333, 95% CI 1.058, 1.679; P = 0.015; Fig. 4 c), but there was no association between BsmI and MM in dominant model (OR 1.554, 95% CI 0.827, 2.922; P = 0.171; Fig. 4 d).

The results show that the type of RS algorithm is highly significant ( F (2, 22) = 16.7; p < 0.001).

The ex vivo epithelial cell adhesion assay results indicated a highly significant reduction in bacterial adhesion to T24 cells compared to placebo (p < 0.001) following the consumption of cranberry dosages containing 36 or 72 mg of PAC (Table 1 , Figure 1 ).

Statistically, there was a highly significant increase in the percentage of degenerated neurons in the VaD group compared with the control group (38.85 ± 2.71 vs. 1.75 ± 0.20, respectively, P < 0.001).

Differences between groups were considered significant if * p < 0.05, highly significant if ** p < 0.01 and extremely significant if *** p < 0.001.

Both sex and age of the child are highly significant with the prevalence of ARI ( p -value < 0.001).

Therefore, the median score of these individual visual scores revealed no non-diagnostic score. A Kruskal-Wallis test for comparing the other median scores to the SNR showed highly significant differences ( χ 2 (2) = 40.77, p < 0.001) in mean ranks of SNR between visual score categories.

A highly significant positive correlation ( r 6 = 0.98, p < .001) was found between CBD concentrations in homogenized brain tissue and the 5 CBD doses ( Figure 1A ).

The difference between the CD105 positive and the negative group regarding the response to therapy was highly significant ( X 2 14.383* MC P-value <0.001).

The consumption of foods not recommended for diabetics was highly significant in rural rather than urban subjects p<0.001, in subjects with poor glycaemic control (HbAc1>7%) rather than good p<0.001.

This association was statistically highly significant ( P -value < 0.001).

Results During the lockdown, calls from private citizens showed a highly significant increase (+ 11.5%, p < .001) and occupational exposures decreased (− 11.7%, p = .011).

Our tabulated prediction accuracy (averaged over 39 subjects completing the experiment) over the full stimulus set (see Table 1 ) was highly significant for both valence (p < .001; signed rank; α = .05; h 0 : μ = .5) and arousal (p < .001; signed rank; α = .05; h 0 : μ = .5).

Regarding both PR and p53 expression, the difference between the LMS group and the three non-sarcomatous groups was highly significant (p < 0.001).

[ 33 ]) was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

2 e) showed that these differences were highly significant for both genders (all p < 0.001; post-hoc to Model 1, Supplementary Table S2 ), except for girls’ grades in Sciences and Social Sciences, which were indistinguishable (b = − 0.47, p = 0.3895; post-hoc to Model 1, Supplementary Table S2 ).

Among all independent variables, only age was observed to highly significant (P-value < 0.001).

All observed differences were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

This difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The sex difference in directional discordance also persisted and remained highly significant (χ 2 (2) = 29.784, p < 0.001): among females, lower-than-tertile 48.5%, matching 39.4%, higher-than-tertile 12.1%; among males, lower-than-tertile 27.2%, matching 37.0%, higher-than-tertile 35.9%.

Highly significant differences in pH (p = 0.001) were observed in five of the products.

The results showed highly significant effects for the covariate familiarity, F (1) = 58.84, p < .001, as well as the factor metaphoricity , F (1) = 12.188, p < .001.

Emergency surgery is also highly significant ( P <0.001; OR=1.89).

Differences between the statistical data were considered statistically significant if P < 0.05 and highly significant if P < 0.001.[ 16 ] R ESULTS In the present study, no deaths were reported throughout the whole experimental period.