“highly significant”

We found that impaired individuals had mean BrainCheck composite scores of 14.4 (SD 3.8) as compared to 20.4 (SD 2.2) in the healthy individuals, a highly significant difference ( P <.001).

Highly significant functional annotation clusters (geometric mean of member categories’ P -values < 0.001 which was calculated based on Fisher’s exact test) for each of the 5 SOTA expression profile clusters are shown in Table 1 .

The BT term was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001) when incorporated into the models for all species except American plaice and golden redfish.

Alexithymia: In both models, alexithymia significantly predicts IAD, with coefficients of β = 0.27 (Model 1) and β = 0.26 (Model 2), both highly significant ( p < 0.001).

However, a highly significant difference was observed regarding the use of additional mood stabilizers (p < 0.001).

The analysis revealed a highly significant effect on the model fit [ χ 2 (1) = 222.59, p < 0.001].

In particular, the differences in EPA, DHA, γ-linolenic acid, AA, and EPA/ AA ratio were highly significant (all P < 0.001).

We reported a highly significant lower number of the patients developed agitation in the propofol TIVA anesthesia group than the Sevoflurane anesthesia group (P ≤ 0.001) with a higher percentage of the patients with a score zero (67.5% in the propofol TIVA group compared with 15% in the sevoflurane group).

[ 19 ] noted a highly significant correlation between these two tests ( r = 0.87; p < 0.001).

Results from the RM ANOVA confirmed a highly significant main effect of HA amplification on speech perception (F(1, 24), p < 0.001 , n 2 = 0.240 ), demonstrating that HA amplification substantially enhances WRP.

The analysis yielded an F-statistic of 298.59 and a p -value of approximately 9.03 × 10 −57 , indicating highly significant differences among model performances ( p < 0.001).

The mean age of the alcohol users was 35.16 ± 10.2 compared to the opioid users, whose mean age was 26.09 ± 5.65, and this difference was found to be, statistically, highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The following parameters exhibited highly significant results (p<0.001): MI-OP, IMPA, FMIA, L1-NB (linear, angular) and Interincisal Angle.

The ANOVA indicated that the main effect of Conflict Adaptation was highly significant, F (1,52) = 11.70; p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.20.

At T 2 , the intervention group outperformed the control group by 5.561 points, with a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001).

The differences are highly significant ( p < 0.001), highlighting the critical role of clinical staging in predicting long‐term survival in NPC patients.

The repeated measures ANOVA indicated a highly significant improvement over time for all WHOQOL-BREF domains: physical health (F[1.861, 368.461] = 40.820, p = 0.001]); psychological health (F[1.845, 365.280] = 55.490, p = 0.001); social relationships (F[1.583, 313.462] = 25.189, p = 0.001) and environment (F[1.791, 354.709] = 40.902, p = 0.001).

The elicited antibody response of mice as illustrated in Figure 4 showed a highly significant ( p value < 0.001) increase in O.D reading of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated group in comparison with control group and peptides groups at weeks 2, 4, 8 and 10 post-vaccination.

Results All mARC plans were considered valid for treatment and yielded a highly significant improvement in the CI over 3D-CRT plans (p <0.001).

After the scheduled exercise, highly significant ( p < 0.001, effect size: 0.73) reductions in IOP, but no significant changes in CCT ( p = 0.229), were observed.

While these variations were not statistically significant on most individual farms, the regional averages revealed pronounced and highly significant differences, with a p-value < 0.001 for all three tests.

The interaction between AF and the Deep-minus-Surface score was highly significant, F(1, 1626) = 64.29, p < 0.001, indicating that the relationship between relative learning orientation and marks differed clearly by AF.

A probability of p < 0.10 was considered as marginally significant, of p < 0.05 as significant, of p < 0.01 as highly significant and of p < 0.001 as extremely significant.

On the other hand, there was a highly significant effect with respect to the dura mater and sphenoid bone blocks on low and high Battelle scores ( p < 0.001), to a lesser extent than the parietal bone ( p < 0.05).

On the other hand, OSI values exerted highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences among groups.