“highly significant”

Results Segments with normally distributed pixel-wise T1 (57/58%) showed no difference between mean and median quantification in either patient group, while differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for the respective 43/42% non-normally distributed segments.

These results were confirmed by a mixed ANOVA on the Fisher-z-transformed correlation values, for which the interaction of within-participant (rating dimension) and between-participant factor (across-group comparison) became highly significant [ F (22,32967) = 1781.268, p < 0.001, n2 = 0.178].

The solid fraction showed a very minor increase in CD69 expression on lymphocytes, and a highly significant suppression of CD69 expression on monocytes ( P < 0.001) (Fig. 3 b).

A highly significant influence on mental exhaustion was found for the predictor variable quantitative demands after inclusion of all variables (model 2) ( B = 0.38, β = 0.39, p < 0.001).

Most interestingly, the population structure in which the TuMV lineages had evolved has a highly significant net ( D ) effect on the phenotypic vector ( Table 1 ; P < 0.001), though it is of small–medium size in the multivariate analysis ( η P 2 = 0.057), and of similar effect for both AUDPS and f (univariate ANCOVAs shown in Supplementary Table S1 ; η P 2 = 0.042 and η P 2 = 0.051, respectively).

In this analysis, the year effect was highly significant ( P < 0.001), but showed a weak relation to effects of management strategy ( P > 0.05).

Moreover, a highly significant positive relationship between a family history of DM and a family history of thyroid disorders was affirmed (p < 0.001 and β = 0.461).

As a consequence, further analysis was undertaken to compare alpha peak frequency variance between groups, with highly significant between group effects found for both occipital ( F (24, 24) = 59.98, p < .001) and frontal ( F (24, 24) = 29.15, p < .001) regions.

A highly significant ( p < 0.001) increase in sepsis was revealed across the calendar periods with an almost 5-fold increase in 2014–2017 (RR 4.69 95% CI 3.69–5.96).

The parameter estimates for the model using DBH and H together as predictors (M2) were highly significant ( p < 0.001), with acceptable PRSE values (PRSE < 25%) for each species.

A two-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant interaction between rivalry/nonrivalry conditions and contrast levels: F (2, 18) = 41.288, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.821.

Regarding perceptions of job-related career development factors, a highly significant relationship was found with age ( p < 0.001), education level ( p < 0.001), and academic position ( p < 0.001), while years of experience also showed a statistically significant association ( p = 0.010).

These differences are robust across different age comparisons, with particularly strong effects observed in the transitions to ages 14 and 15, where the decrease in overlap compared to earlier ages consistently shows large effect sizes [HLe’s >3.0 (lower 95% CI >2.5)] and highly significant differences [all MWU p values <0.001].

The differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Differences in community composition are highly significant, as shown by both ANOSIM and PERMANOVA ( p < 0.001, Supporting Information Table S4 ), providing proof for a distinct succession of fungal communities.

The results of the multiple logistic regression analyses indicated a highly significant correlation between extinction and O 2 -carrying capacity ( p < 0.001; Figure 3 A; Tables S3–S9 ).

After incubation in the field, there was a highly significant effect of site ( F = 28, df = 1,32, P < 0.001; Appendix S1 : Table S2) and species of litter ( F = 26, df = 1,32, P < 0.001; Appendix S1 : Table S2) on the mass of carbohydrates remaining in litter, whereby this mass was lower in litter decomposing in forest plots and B. pubescens contained higher amounts of carbohydrates than E. nigrum , respectively (Fig. 3 a).

A 3-dimensional scatter plot of the symptoms distribution over the time after SM surgery with the display of the associated regression plane shows a highly significant decreased of all symptoms over the time (p<0.001) ( Fig. 2 ).

A one‐way ANOVA on log‐transformed CO 2 content revealed highly significant differences between samples (F (9,20) = 1521, p < 0.001).

The difference between the groups in risk change was highly significant (p<0.001).

CLDN18.2 expression correlated with positive EBV status on a highly significant level ( p < 0.001).

For the representative subject ( Figure 2B ), the correlation coefficients for both color- ( r = 0.66) and disparity-selective activation maps ( r = 0.53) were highly significant (both p<0.001, family-wise-error [FWE] corrected; activation patterns from the two sessions were shown in Figure 2—figure supplement 2 ).

CO Emissions: Highly significant reduction with CNG (F = 45.63, p < 0.001).

A Mann–Whitney U test comparing baseline VAS values provided for the 10 days before intervention with VAS values provided for the 10 days after intervention was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

To facilitate understanding, in addition to p value, symbols were added to significant results (* when p < 0.05), very significant results (** p ≤ 0.01) and highly significant results (*** p ≤ 0.001).