“highly significant”

Statistical analysis demonstrated a highly significant association between the anatomical location of foreign bodies and their prevalence ( P = 0.001), indicating that the distribution of foreign bodies varied significantly between the rumen and reticulum (Table 4 ). 4.

Over 2000–2021, ice discharge in this sector shows a statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) negative trend while OTF shows a statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) positive trend until 2019 (Fig. 3 b).

Brackish water showed highly significant (p ≤ 0.001) effect on number of spikes during all years.

Variations in amino sugars and MNC content in soil LMM analysis showed that land-use type had a highly significant main effect on all four amino sugars ( p < 0.001), whereas soil depth alone had no significant main effect on any of them.

The study was highly significant for the primary outcome ( P < 0.001) with OR of 15.6 [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.32–56.31] for HR-MRI predicting AH.

There was a highly significant association ( P ≤ 0.001) of the premalignant lesion with the duration, type of habit, frequency of the habit, and age group of the patients.

Taking “the velvety sensation of the first assessment “as an example, the fixed-effects test results showed that the main effect of wine sample was highly significant (F(3, 96) = 19.568, p < 0.001), indicating significant differences in velvety sensation among the wine samples; the main effect of repetition was not significant (F(1, 96) = 0.754, p = 0.387), suggesting no systematic bias between the two replicate assessments; and the interaction between wine sample and repetition was not significant (F(3, 96) = 0.534, p = 0.660), indicating that the pattern of changes across the two assessments was consistent for all wine samples.

Comparisons between Child–Pugh A and Child–Pugh C, as well as between Child–Pugh B and Child–Pugh C, were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

When pooling data across all years, a highly significant deviation in monthly distribution was observed ( p < 0.001).

EGCG group also showed a highly significant decline in fluorescence intensity (56.3 ± 2.08%) in comparison with juglone group ( p -value < 0.001).

Several other correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.001), but the correlation coefficients were small, indicating that the rhizochron index does partially contain some of the conventionally measured attributes, but the conventional traits weakly predict the parameter m in the rhizochron index. 3.

As for maximum biosurfactant productivity, Y 2 , which indicates the effectiveness of the microbe to produce high concentrations of biosurfactant in the shortest period of time, proved that the quadratic model was highly significant ( p = 0.001) in which there was only a 0.01% probability that such a large model F value could be generated due to noise ( supplementary data: Table S2 ).

The application’s results were positively associated with the caries level at a statistically highly significant level (p < 0.001) in all age groups.

At an initial 1 μM concentration, the pure CR showed 94.6% cell viability, whereas the CR-MC depicted highly significant ( p < 0.001) cell viability (60.86%).

For all assessments, p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The expressions of candidate cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, CRP, and WBC) were highly significant (p<0.001) in T2DM.

In the context of pivot injuries, 15 out of 21 patients (71.4%) exhibited involvement of the KF, in contrast to only 2 out of 29 patients (6.9%) without pivot injuries, demonstrating a highly significant difference (OR, 33.8 [95% CI, 6.04-188.53]; P < .001).

The AUD group showed a predominant pattern of hyperconnectivity among all significant connections (25 of 29 connections, p < 0.05) ( Figure 5 , panels a–e) as well as among 12 highly significant connections (11 of 12 connections, p ≤ 0.001) ( Figure 6 ), where parahippocampal connections with other DMN regions were predominant (13 connections overall; six highly significant connections).

Analysis of the intrinsic reactivity of the MWCNT preparations by EPR showed a highly significant generation of free radicals by all of the materials ( P < 0.001 vs. vehicle control) which was significantly reduced by freeze granulation although still remained very high.

p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*), p < 0.01 as highly significant (**), p < 0.001 as extremely significant (***), and ns as not significant.

Additionally, the tetracycline group showed significant reductions in plaque index ( P < 0.05) and highly significant reductions in modified sulcular bleeding index ( P < 0.001) compared to the saline group.

Factorial ANOVA revealed highly significant effects of all tested factors (variety, pathogen, surface disinfection, and treatment) and their interactions (all p < 0.001), indicating a strongly context-dependent response.

The differences were defined as statistically significant (* p < 0.05), highly significant (** p < 0.01), and extremely significant (*** p < 0.001).

Consequently, the influence of sex became highly significant ( p < 0.001 for TDC and p < 0.01 for R), and the influence of hypoxia remained significant ( p < 0.01 for TDC and p < 0.05 for R) due to the significant differences between hypobaric and control females, but not males.

Statistically highly significant differences across all three groups were found on the HAM-A scale for both the SCID ( F = 53.75, df = 2, p < 0.001) and replicative data sets ( F = 53.75, df = 2, p < 0.001).

Result: In the study group, the mean pre-intervention, and postintervention after 10 days and six months, knowledge score was found to be statistically significant ( P < 0.001, highly significant).