Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the first validation cohort, RCS analysis identified a highly significant association (overall P < 0.001) with a significant nonlinear trend ( P for nonlinearity = 0.011), whereas a linear association was observed again in the second validation cohort (overall P < 0.001, P for nonlinearity = 0.068).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Phenotypic assessment and correlation analysis The two parents, LMY22 and LY343, showed significant ( P < 0.05) or highly significant ( P < 0.001) differences for all the examined traits except for fibre elongation (FE) and boll number (BN) (Table S6 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A one-way MANOVA on five quantitative leaf traits (55 individuals: 15 Ilex lanceifolia , 20 Ilex xiaojinensis , 20 Ilex peiradena ) revealed a highly significant species effect (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.086, F 10,96 = 23.22, p < 0.001), confirming that the three species are morphologically distinct.
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In trained state, on the other hand, there were highly significant general differences between the vitamin and placebo group ( p < 0.001) both for the genes showing the largest SIT-induced increases (IL-1β and IL-6, Figure 1 a) and those showing more moderate effects ( Figure 1 b).
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
We found a highly significant spatial correlation ( r = .91, p < .001) between the uncorrected voxel‐wise FCD‐neuroticism correlation map with and without controlling for trait anxiety and harm avoidance (Figure S3 ), indicating that removing the variance from trait anxiety and harm avoidance may not obviously bias our results.
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The finding that individual HDI components modelled continuously were not significantly associated with mortality in unadjusted analyses, while fully adjusted continuous HDI was highly significant (OR 0.33; P < 0.001) and restricted cubic splines confirmed a significant overall association (χ2 = 24.7; P < 0.001), warrants careful interpretation.