“highly significant”

The F test on the combined regression model demonstrated that the interaction between gender and height quartile was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

As there was a large difference in the log-likelihoods between the two models (75.33), the likelihood ratio test was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The death rate was not statistically significant in terms of gender (male / female) p = 0.830, p>0.05, but highly significant if we refer to the total body surface area (TBSA) p <0.001.

The gender difference is highly significant ( p < .001).

Species richness recorded highly significant ( P < 0.001) results in all locations.

0.5 mM) resulted in a highly significant increase (P<0.001) compared to the solvent-only control (n = 10, SEM = 0.20, d.f. = 45, CV = 19%) ( Fig. 3a ).

Kaplan–Meier analyses confirmed that the observed differences between the survival curves of the control and treatment cohorts were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The ANOVA analysis revealed highly significant variation among genotypes ( P < 0.001) and genotype x year interactions (P < 0.001) for all parameters.

Consistent with results obtained for the original analysis, we found highly significant effects of ROI type ( F 7,864 = 6.29, p < 0.001) and Δ Disparity Correlation ( F 5,864 = 20.12, p < 0.001), and no significant effects of temporal order or interaction on classification results.

Even though genotypes evolved from R lost 24.38% of their robustness and those evolved from F increased in robustness by 20.09%, differences between the two groups were still highly significant (Wilcoxon's signed ranks test: P < 0.001).

F5 cells exhibited decreased fold-upregulation of Wnt activity compared to HCT-116 cells, and the greater than two-fold difference in Wnt signaling upregulation between these lines was highly significant ( P < 0.001) (Fig. 1 C).

Notably, highly significant interactions were observed for word 4 and word 5 (word 4, t = 11.065, p < 0.001; word 5, t = 4.585, p < 0.001).

However, the increase in AST levels was highly significant (p < 0.001) in the EBV/HCV (93.9 ± 11.39 U/mL), HCV (75.4 ± 16.5 U/mL) and EBV (51.5 ± 8.3 U/mL) patients compared to the NC (29.5 ± 14.2) ( Fig. 3 ).

In comparison to the controls and the prior shorter treatments times of 30 s and 60 s these reductions were highly significant (p<0,001).

russeli were highly significant for the full dataset before (CR = 0.621, P < 0.001) and after (CR = 0.519, P < 0.001) allometric correction and with the landmark-only dataset before (CR = 0.851, P < 0.001) and after allometric correction (CR = 0.738, P < 0.001).

Notably, DHRS9 and CHGB exhibited higher median values in the experimental group, whereas TNNI1 and DNER showed lower median values, with highly significant differences ( P < .001).

The analysis revealed one highly significant discriminant function (eigenvalue: 14.318; % of variance: 100%; canonical correlation: 0.967; Wilks’ Lambda: 0.065; X 2 : 53.216; p < 0.001).

In SR group, a highly significant increase was seen in the intercanine width over the 12-week period ( P < 0.001).

This, the largest case–control study of STS among survivors of childhood cancer, finds a highly significant dose–response relationship with RT, the risk increasing with increasing cumulative dose to soft tissue (trend P <0.001).

3.1.2 pH Biochar was the sole factor that had a highly significant effect (GLMM: p < 0.001) on soil pH ( Table 3 ).

The percentage of HCV-positive patients was highly significant ( p < .001) in NHL (30/71, 42.3%) while lower percentage was found in HD patients (1/8, 11.1%).

S2 as indicated by more sniff time or higher social indexes to S2 than to S1 was highly significant if the ITIs were set at a short interval, 1 or 5 min ( Figure 1B3 , ∗∗∗ P < 0.001), but not at a longer one, 30 min or 6 h ( P > 0.05).

Among these, PS exhibited the strongest discriminative performance, with highly significant differences between csPCa and ciPCa in the overall, PZ, TZ, and ≥1 cm lesions (all P<0.001).

Strikingly, in wounds with 75 to 100% necrotic tissue, the proportion of allergens is reduced and a highly significant increase in the proportions of pathogens is observed ( P < 0.001 by analysis of variance and Tukey post-hoc analysis) ( Fig. 4C ).

There were strong highly significant correlations between calf muscle fat fraction and CMTES (Spearman ρ = 0.798, P < 0.001) and between calf muscle fat fraction and the lower limb motor components of the CMTES (Spearman ρ = 0.813, P < 0.001).