Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Impact of Planting Date and Cultivars on the Duration of Phenological Phases The variance analysis of cycle duration (from VC to R7 stage) in calendar days (CD VC–R7) showed a highly significant effect (p < 0.001) of planting date, cultivar, and the interaction of these two factors ( Table 6 ).
highly significantP ≤0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Differences between groups of * P ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant, ** P ≤0.01 were considered highly significant. *** P ≤0.001 were considered very highly significant. 3 Results 3.1 Fabrication for the bone adhesive After mixing the PEG-SG and TA, a porous bone adhesive was formed due to hydrogen bond interactions among the polymers ( Fig.
highly significantp = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Additionally, the interaction with trial block was highly significant ( F (1,14) = 18.509, p = 0.001) due to a greater reduction in the hexagon maze than the radiolarian maze ( Fig. 4 B).
Spatial learning by mice in three dimensions.
Behav Brain Res · 2015 · PMC4451476
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Occupation, education, age, residence, and monthly expenditure all showed highly significant associations with KAP ( p < 0.001), with occupation (χ2=383.314) and education (χ2=363.490) emerging as the most influential factors (Table 3 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The inversion also showed a sex-specific effect on the duration of the larval stage, with no significant difference among female genotypes (on average, αα: 9.0 days, αβ: 8.7 days, ββ: 9.0 days; glmm p = 0.57) but highly significant differences among males (glmm p < 0.001, Fig. 2b Supplementary Table 5 , Supplementary Fig. 3 ).
highly significantp = 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results of multiple linear regression analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation between nitrogen application rate and dry matter quality score (β = 0.658, p = 0.004) in 2021, and a highly significant positive correlation between nitrogen application rate and dry matter quality score (β = 1.435, p = 0.001) in 2022 (Table S1).