“highly significant”

The median OS for the four risk categories was not reached, 240, 72 and 18 months, respectively, and the difference was highly significant ( P <0.001; Figure 1 ).

The results showed that despite being highly significant (beta = 0.49, p < 0.001) there was no change in the direction and significance of the main effects and interactions found in the reported analyses.

A highly significant positive correlation (0.643; p <0.001) could be observed between usefulness and comprehensiveness of the videos, together with negative correlations between the visualization rate and usefulness (-0.186; p <0.05), and visualization rate and comprehensiveness (-0.183; p <0.05).

Our F -test result was highly significant, demonstrating substantial differences in symmetry between surface and three cavefish populations ( F (3,116) = 23.99, P << 0.001).

The differences between the clinics were highly significant ( p < 0.001) (Table 2 ); 7.6% of patients seen in the ODM had a previous suicide attempt.

3a–c ) when compared with the other two groups with the mean value of 0.9 and also found to be very significant with p -value <0.001, which points to the main pathology of midbrain atrophy in PSP. 1 Meanwhile, there is no statistical significance noted in the Pons area among the three groups ( p -value 0.07) ( Table 2 ). Patients with other PD show highly significant difference in the mean value of width of middle cerebellar peduncle (0.9 ± 0.3; p value < 0.001) as middle cerebellar peduncle atrophy can occur in multisystem atrophy disease ( Table 2 and Fig. 4a–c ). 4 Several studies prove the atrophy of SCP in PSP patients, but in our study no signif

A highly significant result (P<0.001) was found with soft TAs strongly associated with fewer attempts at TA aspiration.

A highly significant increase was observed (P < 0.001).

Another highly significant ( P < 0.001) negative correlation was found between the patient's knowledge about glaucoma as a disease and its possible sequelae and the delay in years.

pallidum was markedly higher in the HIV-positive cases (29.0%) than in the controls (1.0%), with a highly significant difference (OR, 39.92; 95% CI, 6.31–165.40; P <0.001).

Group differences were considered highly significant, significant, and almost significant when the probabilities (p) of error in rejecting the null hypothesis were p < 0.001, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively.

rural) shows a weaker association ( p = 0.059), education level is highly significant, with illiterate individuals having the highest rate of sleep disturbances (76.2%, p < 0.001).

Difference in means of daily milk yield, 6% FCM, SCM, and ECM were non-significant (P>0.05) in animals having RS1 and RS2, but was highly significant (P<0.001) in RS3+4.

Highly significant functional annotation clusters (geometric mean of member categories’ P -values < 0.001 which was calculated based on Fisher’s exact test) for each of the 5 SOTA expression profile clusters are shown in Table 1 .

Learning disability was added as a covariate to linear regression analysis and a significant correlation between lower BFS and recent episodes of HAEC (p = 0.035) was observed; with LD also a highly significant correlate (p < 0.001).

This effect is not significant for “light smokers” relative to “never smokers”, while it became highly significant for “heavy smokers” relative to “never smokers” (OR = 4.638, p < 0.001).

All models for the four WHOQOL domains were highly significant ( p < 0.001), while others showed varying significance levels.

Finally, we demonstrated a highly significant ( P < 0.001) association between immune checkpoint expression and TPCDS, with notable co-expression among immune checkpoints (Fig. 7 J).

The log-rank test indicated a highly significant difference in survival distributions between the two groups ( p < .001).

Furthermore, the correlation values were highly significant for all the items ( p < 0.001).

The error in the up‐sampled populations (AFQUP and WBUP) is decreased compared to the initial sets (AFQ and WB) for each subject, and comparison at the group level shows a highly significant decrease in the mean NRMSE between AFQ and AFQUP and between WB and WBUP (paired samples, p < .001).

The p -value of <0.05 was considered a significant difference, while p < 0.01 was considered as highly significant, and p < 0.001 was considered as extremely significant. 5.

By comparing these observed values with what would be expected if there were no differences between the standards, the test revealed a highly significant result (p < 0.001).

The differences in percentages of the normal milk constituents fat (standard error of the difference: SED = 0.27), protein (SED = 0.08), SNF (SED = 0.21) and lactose (SED = 0.11) along the milk marketing chains were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The correlation between reading and verbal WM remained highly significant, r (207) = .321, p < .001.