“highly significant”

pylori leads to highly significant adhesion inhibition ( p < 0.001).

There is a highly significant (p < 0.001) negative correlation between the charge transport occurrence and the membrane potential, indicating that these events are most likely related.

A highly significant down regulation of ACTA2 was observed in response to RHOA knockdown in each of the osteoblast-like cell lines examined ( P<0.001 ).

Figure 1B shows that the difference between the 1st and 2nd run was highly significant (three-way ANOVA; P <0.001).

Results showed that there was a strong and highly significant correlation (r 2 = 0.688, P = 0.001) between the visual disease assessments of yellow rust and the qPCR quantification of P . striiformis ( S2 Fig ).

Coefficients of determination were relatively high for each individual tree (BB: 0.66 ± 0.19, RO: 0.62 ± 0.12, HE: 0.69 ± 0.11, ME: 0.82 ± 0.17, Supplementary Tables S1–S4 ) and for site mean sap flow (BB: 0.80, RO: 0.68, HE: 0.74, ME: 0.90), all highly significant (p < 0.001).

41 Statistical analysis showed a highly significant difference between OB-MT groups and PCL+OB-MTs ( P <0.001).

Correlation was weak in early Braak stages I–II ( ρ = 0.064; FDR- p = 0.628), whereas stronger and highly significant correlation was found in later Braak stages: III–IV ( ρ = − 0.424; FDR- p = 0.001), V–VI ( ρ = − 0.440; FDR- p = 0.0004), and all stages combined ( ρ = − 0.430; FDR- p = 0.001).

The table shows highly significant ( P < 0.001) differences were detected among generations for both crosses 1 and 2.

In contrast, a highly significant decrease of metabolically active cells was observed for polyamide + vas + CMC and polyester + gly (p < 0.001).

The multivariable results confirmed that the net differences between the early group (intervention phase) and late group (control phase) were highly significant for all the following biophysical indicators assessed: weight, waist circumference, SBP, DBP (all P values < .001).

1 including VTA-NAc was highly significant, i.e. explained significant variability in sugar wanting (R 2 = 0.34, F(3,41) = 7.03, p = 0.001).

So, controlling for depression, there was no main effect for group [arousal: F (1, 38) = 0.54, p = 0.47; valence: F (1, 38) = 0.70, p = 0.41] or interaction effects group x task [arousal: F (1, 38) = 0.23, p = 0.63; valence: F (1, 38) = 1.41, p = 0.24], whereas effects of task were highly significant [arousal: F (1, 38) = 63.18, p < 0.001; valence: F (1, 38) = 58.23, p < 0.001].

The values collected through the SF-12 Physical Component Summary (PCS) questionnaire show a statistically highly significant change over time ( p < 0.001).

IL-8 levels in NL before treatment correlated with IL-8 levels during AB therapy in a highly significant manner (r = 0.719, P = 0.001).

The difference between the two groups was statistically highly significant ( P = 0.001).

This drop is highly significant ( P < 0.001) and confirms our previous data showing that ASAP/MAP9 protein expression is highly decreased in the colon cell lines tested [ 27 ].

The genome wide statistical tests for overlap between TADs, isochores and LD-blocks were all found to be highly significant (Figure C in S1 File ); all p -values < 0.001.

Using the Pearson Chi Square test, it was determined that the difference between the two groups was highly significant with a p value of <0.001.

The genetic differentiation between goat and sheep was not significant (P = 0.1318) whereas the values obtained for the other comparisons were highly significant (P < 0.001).

These indications were supported by the LMM fitted to the data ( S1 Table ), which indicated highly significant effects of the interaction term (“Monitoring period * Crowded * Hypoxia”, LRT = 67.19, df = 34, p < 0.001) and also experimental phase (LRT = 12.99, df = 2, p = 0.002).

Group analyses confirmed a highly significant mixing cost on rP3 amplitude in Old but a marginal effect in Young adults [2.8μV, F (1,29) = 22.59, p < 0.001 vs. 0.96μV, F (1,24) = 4.57, p = 0.043, respectively; Table 2 ].

Given the distribution of the variables, Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated and highly significant values were obtained ( P < .001; Table 1 ).

Significant differences are indicated using the standard Michelin Guide scale ( P < 0.05, significant; P < 0.01, highly significant; P < 0.001, extremely significant).

In the conventional technique (group III) on the buccal side in both subgroups (RMGIC and resin cement), grade II or III microleakage was not reported in either group, which was highly significant at p = 0.001, followed by the Hall's with SDF using resin cement, and the highest amount of microleakage was shown by the Hall's technique alone using RMGIC cement.