“highly significant”

In all these studies the differences in frequencies were not significant except in one study from Egypt, where the frequencies were reversed from that of our observation and the differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The determination coefficient of model IV, to which subjective-evaluative prosthesis-related regressors were added, again was highly significant [ F (5,153) = 14.713, p < 0.001], with visual realism, mobility , and residual limb stimulation being significant regressors.

Statistical analysis of change in alveolar height with time was done by one way ANOVA test [ Table 3b ] and was found to be very highly significant ( P < 0.001).

While all factors contributed highly significant to the structure of the data ( P < 0.001), the denominator ‘site’ was the most pronounced factor as indicated by the highest Pseudo-F value (Pseudo-F = 10.40).

The ROC curves for all biomarker levels were highly significant ( p < 0.001 for all, Fig. 4 ).

Rivaroxaban dose-dependently inhibited the TF-induced increase in TAT levels over a broad dose range (0.001–0.3 mg kg −1 ); the effect was highly significant at doses ≥ 0.03 mg kg −1 ( P < 0.001), with complete inhibition at 0.3 mg kg −1 rivaroxaban (Fig. 5 A).

Cox regression analyses showed that uEGF/Cr ratio is inversely associated with the risk of graft failure (HR 0.68 [95% CI 0.59‒0.78] per ng/mg) and this association is highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The estimate for sertraline was highly significant ( p < 0.001), meaning the null hypothesis can be rejected on the basis of the theoretical model.

No significant differences between temperature, pH, or turbidity were observed between the two lakes over the study period ( p > 0.05); however, significant and highly significant differences between the two lakes across the sampling period were observed for dissolved oxygen ( p < 0.001), chlorophyll a and b levels ( p < 0.01, p < 0.001), and carotenoids ( p < 0.001) with dissolved oxygen demonstrating the most difference between lakes. 2.3.

difficile with statistically highly significant difference (P < 0.001).

Overall, there was a highly significant linear trend from 7 to 11, p < .001.

Similar findings were reported by Elgebaly and Elzayat, who found a highly significant difference in blood loss between the group receiving TXA and the group with no intervention (n = 100, p<001) [ 11 ].

Differences in ISR total score and sub-scores between admission and discharge/follow-up were statistically highly significant (paired t -test) with p -values < 0.001 (***), with a minor exception for “eating disorder” where differences between admission and follow-up had a p -value of < 0.5 (*).

From the first stage of the IV regression model, the F-test of the instruments was large and highly significant (F-test = 444.94, p < .001) indicating that the instruments were strong.

25 Furthermore, Morris et al in a randomized trial reported highly significant ( P =0.001) improvement in the BDFS in patients treated by ADT for 12 months with elective pelvic irradiation and boosted by low dose rate brachytherapy to the prostate compared with those boosted by external beam for total radiation dose of 78 Gy to the prostate.

Although it represented only <0.1% of the total proportion of CD4 + T cells, this rare circulating subset producing all four cytokines (IFNγ + , IL-17A + , GM-CSF + , IL-2 + ) showed a modest reduction as early as 12 weeks and a highly significant ( P < 0.001) reduction at weeks 28 and 52 after the start of therapy (Fig. 3d,h ).

1 and 2 ) Taking into consideration the precise localization of the recurrent plaque, 41/41(100%) specimens were unilateral (compared to 30/41 (73.2%) in pVFL; the difference is highly significant: G (1) = 17.0, p < 0.001), but in 2/41 (4.9%) patients, the lesions spread in the anterior commissure (compared to 16/25 (39.0%) in pVFL, the difference is highly significant: G (1) = 15.5, p < 0.001).

The baseline AAAS score was also highly significant, with every point higher on the baseline AAAS predicting a 0.48 higher AAAS score at follow-up (beta = 0.48; SE = 0.09; P < 0.001).

We observed a highly significant difference in percent survival between these two genotypes (P<0.001).

pelagicus was found within individuals, and highly significant in all cases (F IT = 0.125–0.19, P<0.001).

Galling Insect Richness x Tree Species x Forest Type Our initial (maximal) model was highly significant (d.f. = 36,41; P<0.001) and explained 83% of variability observed in the galling insect richness (GIR).

The median levels of CSF o-α-syn were slightly increased in the PD group (Table 3 ); however, when the oligomeric/total α-syn ratio (o/t-α-syn ratio) was calculated, increased values in the PD group with respect to OND subjects were highly significant ( P < 0.001; Table 3 ).

As a consequence, performance in Experiment 1.2 was worse near the lateral wall than along the corridor's midline: In contrast to Experiment 1.1, there was a highly significant main effect of lateral wall distance in Experiment 1.2 (F 1,30 = 32.38, p<0.001).

The trend test across ALI categories was highly significant ( P < .001).

In all cases, P <0.05 was considered as significant, P <0.01 highly significant, and P <0.001 very highly significant, which was noted in figures and tables with asterisks.