“highly significant”

For breast cancer, the optimal ARIMAX model (0,0,1) identified a positive and highly significant association with PC1 at a lag of 18 years (β = 0.108, p < 0.001).

The multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA, Tables 4 and 5 ) revealed that the type of biodigestate used as feedstock for biochar production had a highly significant effect (partial η 2 = 0.52, 95% CI [0.41–1.00], p < 0.001) on all evaluated physiological variables in forage: fresh weight (MANOVA, F = 214.2, p < 0.001), dry weight (MANOVA, F = 140.0, p < 0.001), chlorophyll content (MANOVA, F = 376.4, p < 0.001), and moisture (MANOVA, F = 376.4, p < 0.001).

The pairwise comparison for “coronal”/“middle” showed no significance (p = 0.465), whereas that for “coronal”/“apical” and “middle”/“apical” showed highly significant differences (p < 0.001).

This was evidenced by their Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), and Short Sensory Profile (SSP) scores (27.47 ± 7.95, 71.59 ± 11.55, and 156.47 ± 20.17, respectively), with a highly significant reduction in sensory hypersensitivity ( p = 0.001) compared to the WLT group, which presented more severe scores on CARS (35.89 ± 8.96), SRS (81.72 ± 7.68), and SSP (133.67 ± 11.65).

Significant reductions were observed in the RFB group ( p < 0.05) and the MT group ( p < 0.01), while the CT group showed a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.001).

There were highly significant differences between treatment doses for tumor burden and hypoxia ( P < 0.001).

The results showed that tobacco leaves from different regions in China exhibited highly significant differences in chemical composition (p-value ≤ 0.001), which may be attributed to the unique geographical locations and climatic conditions of each production area.

All three of these results are highly significant (p < 0.001).

In this group, repeated measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant and robust main effect of time on the outcome measure (F (3, 15) = 198.98, p < 0.001), with a very large effect size (partial η 2 = 0.975).

An alternative analysis using Poisson regression showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) linear mortality decline over the full period 1998–2007.

From the first session onward, significant differences began to emerge ( P = 0.016 for air blast; P = 0.038 for tactile), becoming highly significant in subsequent sessions ( P < 0.001).

There was a significant operator effect on mean body shape, with all pairwise tests displaying highly significant differences between operators ( P -value <0.001 for all comparisons; Table 1 ), supporting the exploratory between-group PCA ( Fig. 2 ).

Highly significant correlations (P< 0.001) were observed between the measured and predicted values for soil pH and the four physicochemical parameters (SOM, AN, AP, and AK), demonstrating the exceptional performance of the established models.

This remarkable increase was quantitatively confirmed by a highly significant rise ( p < 0.001) in the fluorescence intensity of 2,7-DCFH-DA, a ROS-sensitive fluorescent probe.

The spatial smoothing term was highly significant ( edf = 5.77, χ 2 = 331.4, p < 0.001), suggesting a strong spatial structure in outbreak patterns.

There are highly significant differences between the samples concerning anxiety (P<0.001), the mean value of the patients being markedly higher than that of the general population.

The decrease in intrafollicular 17beta-estradiol concentration after the LH surge was highly significant (p < 0.001).

The three remaining predictors were highly significant (p < 0.001 for each parameter) and had regression coefficients comparable to those in the main model (surgical complications: 1.574 vs. 1.694; immediate urine production: −2.049 vs. −2.408; rate of change in serum creatinine: 0.233 vs. 0.233).

The reduction involved both the ipsilateral and the contralateral eyes relative to the lesion, with highly significant differences (i.e., p < 0.001 in several studies) [ 12 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ].

However, social norms were highly significant (p < 0.001).

By designating the distinct generic clades as foreground branches, we unequivocally identified a highly significant signal of positive selection ( p < 0.001) acting exclusively on the ycf1 gene within the Pinalia lineage.

Statistical significance was represented as follows: significant differences (* p < 0.05), very significant differences (** p < 0.01), and highly significant differences (*** p < 0.001). 3.

Discussion In this study, a highly significant negative correlation ( r = –0.992, P = 0.001) was observed between DM accumulation and the R/FR ratio in the different spectral profiles provided by the different colored films, indicating that the DM accumulation was greatly affected by far-red light in G. longituba .

In immunohistochemical staining, leptin receptor expressions in the case and control groups were 57.8 and 2.3%, respectively, which was statistically highly significant ( P <0.001).

Differences in CI between the two measuring methods did not reach significance, whereas the calculated CVAI showed a 0.74-fold decrease using 3D digital photography and was highly significant ( p < 0.001).