“highly significant”

Here, we use mother width as our size measure because preliminary analyses show that although length and width are strongly correlated ( r = .83), partial correlations with birth order indicate that the negative relationship between mother size and birth order is accounted for a highly significant partial correlation with width ( r = –.49; p < .001). 2.1.

In addition, Kruskal-Wallis analysis of historical CL data (2010-2018), summarized in Table 3 , indicated a highly significant difference across regions (χ2 = 18.99, p < 0.001).

The overall treatment effect was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Likewise, a marked variation in weight gain was recorded over time, with the day-to-day effect being highly significant ( p < 0.001).

6 i) showed that there was a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) in blood loss between the blank group and three treatment groups, indicating that both gelatin sponge and cryogel exhibited hemostatic effects.

Histomorphometry revealed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) in the germinal epithelium thickness between the breeding and non-breeding seasons.

Both predictors demonstrated highly significant associations with mSLI ( p < 0.001), with their smooth terms exhibiting a consistent upward trend.

PGE2 levels showed a highly significant difference (p=0.001) with a large effect size (η2=0.91).

Mortality rates were notably higher in the tracheostomy group, with 83.3% deceased compared to 22.2% in the non-tracheostomy group, presenting a highly significant p -value of <0.001.

Highly significant associations were obtained between C18:1 and the SNPs ( Table 5 ): SNP140 (r = 0.812, p < 0.001), SNP206 (r = 0.803, p < 0.001), SNP307 (r = 0.772, p < 0.001), SNP593 (r = −0.546, p = 0.016), SNP699 (r = −0.736, p < 0.001), SNP755 (r = −0.763, p < 0.001), SNP776 (r = −0.802, p < 0.001), SNP788 (r = −0.763, p < 0.001), SNP902 (r = 0.763, p < 0.001), SNP919 (r = 0.763, p < 0.001), SNP988 (r = 0.691, p = 0.001), SNP1083 (r = −0.772, p < 0.001), SNP1181 (r = 0.689, p = 0.001) and SNP1237 (r = −0.629, p = 0.004).

All assessed outcomes demonstrated considerable heterogeneity, with I2 values exceeding 90% and highly significant Cochran’s Q statistics ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant difference between the two groups ( p < 0.001) was found regarding the presence of bone debris in the post-operative radiographs.

Contrarily, it seems that fatty infiltration of the infraspinatus and subscapularis is a highly significant factor (p<0.001). 55 Another point is the bone quality.

The difference in diploid and aneuploid DNA pattern (the ploidy state) between group 1 and group 2A or group 2B and between group 2A and group 2B and the hyperdiploid aneuploidy and the tumorigenesis was statistically highly significant ( p = 0.001).

Further analysis through a paired t -test yielded a highly significant result ( p value <0.001, 95% CI) ( Table 2 ).

Remarkably a highly significant difference in slopes (P < 0.001) supports the suggestion that in this model uranium is a good substitute for selenium.

This difference is highly significant (p<0.001, 2-sided Mann-Whitney).

We observed only a low, but highly significant, positive correlation of transcript and protein abundance for all three genotypes (R ≥ 0.2, p ≤ 0.001) (Fig. 3a , b ).

Clinically, a highly significant association ( p < 0.001) was found between the presence of the vacA gene and emetic syndrome.

Emotional value had a highly significant positive effect on store loyalty ( p < 0.001), supporting hypothesis H6b.

The platelet count also showed a highly significant difference ( p = 0.001), with group D having the lowest platelet count (288.83 × 103/mm3), significantly lower than groups A ( p = 0.002), B ( p = 0.009), and C ( p = 0.002).

For every reference gene, the difference was highly significant (p < 0.001).

6B ), which was also highly significant (p < 0.001).

The relationship between AI Transparency and Employee Trust is highly significant ( r = 0.63; p < 0.001) and the relationship between AI Transparency and Algorithmic Justice is also very strong ( r = 0.72; p < 0.001).

PERMANOVA further revealed highly significant differences in community structure among treatments ( R2 = 0.6858, P = 0.001).