“highly significant”

The expression of FOXM1B/C showed highly significant differences in non-metastatic tumor and paired normal tissues ( P <0.001) ( Supplementary Figure S6e and g ).

The ANOVA results show a very highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) between the nine strains with respect to the inhibition of DPPH radical ( Figure 5 ).

The difference between the most disliked and the third disliked politician ( Mdn = 2) was highly significant as well, Z = − 6.20, p < 0.001.

that was highly significant ( p < 0.001) with reference to the group I animals at the end of the 118 d.

All results were highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 3 ).

P < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant and labeled as *, while ** represents P < 0.01 (highly significant), and *** represents P < 0.001 (very highly significant), respectively.

Using a Wilcoxon signed rank test to compare mean hypoglycemic events/month before and during Ramadan showed a highly significant difference ( P = 0.001).

The factor loadings for all items met the criterion value of 0.35; the KMO index was 0.91, and Bartlett’s sphericity test was highly significant at p < 0.001, confirming that a highly reliable and valid instrument was constructed.

11 (23.4%), showed a highly significant difference (p <0.001); among these IL-9, IL-15, IFN-γ, IP-10, TNF-α, IL-1α and MCP-3 underwent a down-regulation, while IL-17 and FGF-basic, G-CSF, GM-CSF an up-regulation.

Furthermore, the ANOVA analyses revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) events by gender interaction effects, both for performance improvements in the years 2021 and 2022 compared to the respective reference values (Fig. 4 ).

difficile with statistically highly significant difference (P < 0.001).

Further analysis revealed that most of the 28 immune-related terms between cluster 1 and cluster 2 were very highly significant differences ( P <0.001) ( Figure 3C ).

This interaction was highly significant for the normalized jerk (p < 0.001, Table 3 ), that was not mainly affected by type of stimuli (p = 0.489).

All correlations were highly significant ( P < 0.001) apart from those between birthweight and the 8, 12, 17, and 22 weeks weight of Av BW pigs ( P < 0.05).

Characterized morphological descriptors displayed a highly significant variation in all 11 morphological quantitative traits (p < 0.001), indicating the existence of wide range variability collection ( Table 1 ).

This frequency dependent effect on response amplitude was highly significant for all four types of eye movement responses (P < 0.001).

The decrease could be detected in 23 out of 24 patients and was highly significant (p<0.001).

The association between DBM and maternal very short height (< 145 cm) was highly significant ( p value < 0.001) in the unadjusted model.

The study revealed a highly significant association between age group and nationality ( p < 0.001) ( Table 4 ).

Highly significant results (P > 0.001) were found in all growth and yield parameters.

This is clear in the highly significant ( p < 0.001 using a chi-squared test) difference in satisfaction between the diagnosed and non-diagnosed participants of normal BMI, with the diagnosed being much less satisfied, independent of their current BMI state.

Table 4 shows that the intervention group (Philips 66 with CBL) showed highly significant improvements ( p <0.001) with large effect sizes (Cohen’s d ranging from 0.597 to 0.635), demonstrating a substantial positive impact on all facets of clinical judgment as defined by the LCJR: Noticing, Interpreting, Responding, and Reflecting.

This increase in the bread volume and height/width ratio was higher than the one induced by the commercial α-amylase, which attained 0.49 and 0.1, respectively (highly significant difference with F = 33.85 ( p < 0.001) for the specific volume and F = 74.72 ( p < 0.001) for the height/width ratio).

Figure 4 shows the distribution observed for each of the groups derived from the above criterion, indicating that the differences between groups were highly significant ( F = 743.12, df = 3, 244; p < 0.001; ε = 0.61).

The number of lesions (≥3) was associated with an approximately 1087% increase in the risk of related events (HR = 11.87, 95% CI = 3.29–42.78), with highly significant statistical results ( P < .001).