“highly significant”

We recorded a highly significant effect of the inclination of the path on the probability of rolling upon perceiving the stimulus (Logistic Regression Model, rubbing: χ 2 1,10 = 752.3, P < 0.001; tapping: χ 2 1,10 = 767.3, P < 0.001, n = 60 for each angle of each treatment).

The IPSS was significantly lower in the intervention group (5.16 ± 1.08) compared to the control group (8.39 ± 1.12), with a highly significant statistical difference ( t = 19.509, P < 0.001).

Results and discussion A significant improvement in EWSE Following the 15-week teaching intervention, students’ overall writing self-efficacy significantly increased (M = 2.75, SD = 0.79) compared to pretest levels (M = 1.56, SD = 0.33), with a highly significant difference, t (19) = 8.32, p < 0.001.

Wald test results for year were consistently highly significant for all focus traits across all models ( p < 0.001 in all cases).

The absolute decrease in adverse effects was highly significant with 3.2% and 4.9% (both P < 0.001) for the 1-year and 3-year endpoints, respectively, corresponding to 33.2% (95% CI, 26.6 to 41.9) and 25.0% (95% CI, 20.4 to 31.4) of relative reduction.

From this, all of the same general sampling locations were clustered between the Arctic and temperate locations, with a diversity gradient flowing from soil to inlet to lake and outlet and highly significant differences between both sources (PERMANOVA, p = 0.001) and general sampling locations (PERMANOVA, p = 0.001).

Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant effect of genotype ( F (1,109) = 194.727, p < 0.001), as well as a significant interaction between genotype, housing condition and age ( F (2,109) = 3.146, p = 0.047) on escape latency.

For PT, almost every metric showed a highly significant difference between the groups ( P < .001).

Five studies, 7 studies, 5 studies, 12 studies, 17 studies, 7 studies, and 2 studies were included to assess the effect of treatment on blood glucose levels at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively, all of which showed a highly significant hypoglycemic effect in the MSC-treated group (1 week: SMD = − 1.484, 95%CI − 2.586 to − 0.381, p < 0.001; I 2 = 80.6%; 2 weeks: SMD = − 2.312, 95%CI − 3.743 to − 0.882, p = 0.002, I 2 = 89.6%; 3 weeks: SMD = − 4.007, 95%CI − 6.472 to − 1.541, p = 0.001, I 2 = 92.1%; 1 month: SMD = − 1.740, 95%CI − 2.660 to − 0.821, p < 0.001, I 2 = 83.8%; 2 months: SMD = − 1.830, 95%CI − 2.633 to − 1.028, p < 0.001; I 2 = 86.0%; 3 months: SMD = − 1.649, 95%CI − 2.838 to − 0.461, p = 0.007; I 2 = 84.6%; 6 months: SMD = − 3.045, 95%CI − 5.895 to − 0.195, p = 0.036; I 2 = 76.4%).

However, both the MCAT and Admissions Interview ratings are highly significant positive predictors of one of the three moral reasoning schemas: the application of principles, also called “postconventional thinking” (MCAT p<.001 and Interview rating p<.05).

Time emerged as a highly significant positive predictor of PEWL ( p < 0.001) across models, confirming PEWL increased meaningfully as time progressed.

As expected, there was a highly significant inverse moderate correlation between repeat length and disease severity for both the Ricci age-corrected Clinical Score (ACCS) (R = −0.491, p < 0.001) and the age-corrected FSHD Clinical Score (R = −0.532, p < 0.001) (Fig. 4 ).

Effect of different treatment groups on soybean biomass under saline-alkaline stress The levels of soil salinity-alkalinity and the addition of fungi and fertilizers had highly significant ( P <0.001) and interactive effects on soybean shoot height and root length ( P <0.05) ( Table 1 ).

In contrast, following normalization to blood iron concentrations, the tumor tissue accumulation of the targeted 30 nm IONP-Tfab and IONP-PEG-Tfab were highly significant relative to the PBS control group (P<0.001, S7A Fig .), and this observation demonstrates that the antibody directed 30 nm IONP specifically localized to tumor tissue following systemic administration in the mouse BT-474 xenograft model.

Although the magnitude of the decrease in lifespan between clk-1 and clk-1;sod-5 worms is small, the difference is highly significant (p < 0.001 for mean lifespan, maximum lifespan and Log-rank test comparing survival curves).

faecalis was highly significant ( P < 0.001) compared to PI-based mouth rinse [Figure 4a and b ].

Prospective follow-up during treatment in the coagulation service revealed a highly significant increase of TTR upon coagulation service treatment (66.2% (49.0/83.6) to 74.5% (62.9/84.2; P <0.001; Figure 1 C).

Specifically, the χ 2 was highly significant (χ 2 = 829.06, df = 132, p < 0.001), and the χ 2 / df value = 6.28, which was higher than the desired value of 3.0.

3 & Table 1 , Overall model r 2 = 85.8%), while demonstrating a highly significant ability to differentiate between each of the activities ( Table 1 , each pairwise activity comparisons p<0.001).

These differences were supported by the two-way ANOVA ( Supplementary Table S2 ), which revealed highly significant species effects (p< 0.001), for both net-assimilation and transpiration rates, while environmental effects and species × environment interactions were not significant. 3.2.

However, when the Candida were quantified, we could not detect any significant difference in cell numbers within the treatment group pre- and post-denture cleansing, despite highly significant differences between the treatment arm and control group from days 3–7 (p < 0.001).

As shown in Table 2 , GAF scores on admission and depressive symptoms as primary reason of admission as independent variables made a highly significant contribution ( p < 0.001) to the model and age as independent variable made a significant contribution ( p < 0.01).

Specifically, the relationships between the two smallest size classes (50–75 μm and 75–100 μm) of zooplankton and the larval fish density were highly significant ( p < 0.001 and p = 0.001; Fig 3A and 3B , S3 Table ).

The difference in survival between the two groups was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001, log-rank Mantel–Cox test) for both U251 ( Figure 6 d) and U87 ( Figure 6 e) models.

The Kaplan-Meier analyses for DMFS as a function of the seven-gene signature showed highly significant differences between the high- and low-risk groups ( Figure 3B , P < 0.001 in the training set; P = 0.039 in the validation set).