“highly significant”

This improvement was found to be statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001), indicating a notable enhancement in patients’ genital self-perception following PDO thread application.

The difference in refractive error (between immediate postoperative error and that at last follow-up) was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Controlling for reporting effort, the number of EID events still shows a highly significant relationship with time (generalized linear model with Poisson errors, offset by log(JID articles) (GLM P,JID ), F = 96.4, P < 0.001, d.f. = 57).

Group differences in change in knowledge across researcher/practitioner category were also highly significant (H = 27.87, p < 0.001), with emerging researchers/practitioners reporting the greatest change (mean rank = 175.70) and core researchers reporting the lowest change (102.17).

The mean reduction in office blood pressure was 14.1 mm Hg with active therapy and 11.7 mm Hg with placebo at 6 months, and was highly significant for both groups compared to baseline ( P <0.001), but the between-group difference was small (2.4 mm Hg) and not significant ( P =0.26).

Gal‐3 was positively correlated with phagocytic NADPH oxidase‐dependent superoxide production ( r =0.476; P <0.001; Figure 6 A), which remained highly significant after controlling for age and sex ( r =0.450; P <0.001; Table 3 ).

Moreover, silymarin (group V) pretreatment produced highly significant decrease ( P < 0.001) in serum SGOT, SGPT, GGT, ALP total bilirubin, and LDH.

Since the effect of TL was always highly significant (p < 0.001), though, such caveat should be less likely to influence the interpretation of this variable.

As expected, a model including Activity ratings ( Table 2 , alternative model) did not yield a close fit between sampled data and the estimated model as shown by a highly significant chi-square ( p < 0.001) and CFI < 0.96.

Still, the estimated difference using all the included trials was highly significant (SMD 0.38 (95CI 0.20 – 0.55), p < 0.001) with a better outcome for the intervention group.

We investigated this interaction reducing the model by age the improvement in performance for the left hand after right hand training was a trend in the younger, F (1, 9) = 4.518, p = .062, η 2 p = .334), but highly significant in the older with a high effect size, F (1, 11) = 36.240, p < .001, η 2 p = .767.

All DD coefficients were highly significant from the reference level (P < 0.001).

All eggs exhibited a change in odour composition between day 1 and day 8 (fertile eggs: δ 1 2 = 0.79, P < 0.001; infertile eggs: δ 1 2 = 0.85, P < 0.001); however, while there was no significant difference in volatile composition between fertile and infertile eggs on day 1 (δ 1 2 = 0.15, P = 0.738), by day 8 the difference was highly significant (δ 1 2 = 0.86, P < 0.001) ( Fig. 1 ).

p < 0.01 highly significant (**). p < 0.001 very highly significant (***).

Moreover, when fold changes for Notch1 and Hes7 mRNA are plotted relative to each other for all samples analysed, there is a highly significant positive correlation ( F 1,13 =21.04; P ≤0.001), which is not the case for Dll1 and Hes7 or for Dll1 and Notch1 ( Fig. 3 F-H; data not shown).

Incubation with the substrate led to a larger drop in caecal reaction than incubation of control samples for both species, as demonstrated by highly significant differences ( P <0.001; Table 2 ).

Conversely, nuclear ( AGP 6 and LFY ) and microsatellite variation mainly occurred within populations (48.33%, 63.26%, and 79.48%, F ST = 0.52, 0.37, and 0.21, respectively; Table 1 ) with all F ST values highly significant ( p < .001).

*, P < 0.05 (considered significant compared with control group); **, P < 0.01 (considered highly significant); ***, P < 0.001 (considered extremely significant). 3 Results 3.1 Identification of inhibitors that target PRRSV nsp4 (3CLSP) A library of 1000 lead compounds was screened against PRRSV 3CLSP using FRET assays.

However, since our results are strongly convincing and since the statistical difference of the primary outcome (time to pain onset) was highly significant ( P < 0.001), which proved sufficient power of the study, we believed that similar results would be achieved with the study that includes random allocation of patients to study and control group, and with the use of placebo in the control group.

For all assessments, p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The expressions of candidate cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, CRP, and WBC) were highly significant (p<0.001) in T2DM.

The analysis result for the whole model was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The hematologic recovery (following withdrawal of rEPO) with and without immunosuppressive therapy was highly significant (57% vs. 2%, respectively, P < 0.001), and nearly 95% had complete recovery following renal transplantation ( n = 19 cases).

We found that the GF diets rendered an eight- to twelve-fold increase of NGF content in the brain, and that the increase was highly significant ( p < 0.001). 4.

We observed highly significant positive correlation between LAS and GLS ( R = 0.804, P < 0.001), moderate positive correlation between LAS and GCS ( R = 0.760, P < 0.001), and moderate negative correlation between LAS and GRS ( R = −0.757, P < 0.001).

A highly significant Co by W interaction was also observed ( p < 0.001).