“highly significant”

The paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test confirmed that their differences were highly significant ( P < 0.001) ( Fig. 2a and c ; Supplementary Fig. 1a and c ; Supplementary Tables 13–16 ).

It was found that: (1) venous congestion tends to straighten the nuclei in al groups; (2) mediators cause a highly significant increase in the number of pinches (P < 0.001), also if the vessels are distended by venous congestion; (3) fixation without venous congestion causes vascular collapse.

According to the multivariable logistic binary regression method, six highly significant independent predictive factors for late HZ were identified: age>20 (p<.001; OR, 4.22), use of immunosuppressants at +1 year (p<.001; OR, 3.98), CD4-CD8 ratio ≥4.71 at +1 year (p<.001; OR, 2.51), certain mental disorders (p<.001; OR, 5.58), engraftment time of granulocytes > 15 days (p<.001; OR, 2.78), and CD8 + cell count ≥77.4/μl at +30 days (p<.001; OR, 0.097).

In both depots the presence of rhythm was highly significant ( P <0.001) ( Table 1 ).

This relationship was confirmed by a Simple Slopes Analysis, which revealed highly significant negative effects (t‐value < −37.9; p < 0.001; Table 3 ; Figure 3 ).

Mean maxillary arch length, arch circumference and inter-canine and inter-molar width in males as well as females was reduced as compared to the control group and this difference was statistically highly significant ( P <0.001) [ Table 4 ].

Randomization trials show that this difference is highly significant (p<0.001) despite the relatively small number of available functionally annotated sites.

Monte Carlo simulations (SI Methods) revealed that this advantage in favor of animals was highly significant (accuracy: p = 0.001, median RT: p<0.0001).

The statistical analysis revealed a highly significant difference in mean hearing threshold among the groups (F=38.777, p=0.001).

The mean reduction in the plaque index score from baseline to 1 month and 3 months for group B was 0.65 and 1.15, respectively, and the mean reduction in the gingival index score for the same group was 0.48 and 0.94, respectively, which was highly significant ( P <0.001).

Even after excluding the four patients who initiated or switched to tirzepatide during the study period, the increase in fCPI remained highly significant ( n = 65, Baseline vs. 12 months: p = 0.001, Wilcoxon signed‐rank test).

The overall model was highly significant (Omnibus test of model coefficients, p < 0.001).

The LSD tests revealed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) in the physiological groups of soil microorganisms at all levels of pollution.

From analysis of variance F (2,59) was found to be 31.65 which is highly significant (P< 0.001) showing that the three groups viz normal (15.4 + 2.6 ng ml 1), CSG (109.8 + 17.7 ng ml- 1) and carcinoma of stomach (367 + 55.5 ng ml- 1) differ significantly.

Highly significant two-way interaction effects between the length of the masking interval and the ball acceleration accounted for this response pattern (TE: F (4, 40) = 30.7, p<0.001 for Experiment 1 and F (4, 40) = 18.8, p<0.001 for Experiment 2; PE: F (4, 40) = 20.8, p<0.001 for Experiment 1 and F (4, 40) = 28.1, p<0.001 for Experiment 2).

Comparison between the baseline and the ninth month was found to be highly significant ( P = 0.001), suggesting that the mouth rinse has better results when used for a longer duration of time.

This difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001, η 2 = 0.89; P < 0.001, η 2 = 0.83).

The results revealed a highly significant interaction, F(3, 498) = 8.46, p < .001, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:{\eta\:}_{p}^{2}$$\end{document} = 0.048.

The overall improvement in the group was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

In domesticus individuals, the model predicts an increase in SC of 6.07 × 10 6 associated with the presence of the Y MUS , this effect being highly significant ( p < 0.001, table 1 ).

The time effect was highly significant ( p < 0.001), confirming consistent clinical improvements across time points.

Results and Discussion A two-way repeated measure ANOVA with dominance and trust as factors (seven levels for each factor) revealed a highly significant main effect of dominance, F (6, 132) = 4.26, p = .001, partial eta squared = .162, Figure 2A , and a significant main effect of trust, F (6, 132) = 3.36, p = .004, partial eta squared = .133; Figure 2B .

Inter-group comparisons at day 7 and for the overall score change (Δ) were highly significant (both p < 0.001).

Reduced activity 0.72 Hair loss 0.78 Nausea 0.32 sleep 0.82 Family Appearance 0.78 Vomiting 0.25 Concentration 0.81 relations 0.70 Self care 0.81 Anxiety 0.70 Depression 0.80 Uniscale 0.72 Increased sleep 0.79 Mobility 0.64 Speech 0.63 Recreation 0.78 Correlation coefficients are highly significant, P < 0.001, except those for Diarrhoea (P= 0.005), Nausea (P =0.002) and Vomiting (P=0.012). 18 P.J.

Mating System, Effective Density of Pollen Donors and Male Reproductive Variance In the study site, we found a highly significant difference between multilocus and single-locus outcrossing rates ( t m = 0.999 vs. t s = 0.856; Student’s t = 94.466, P <0.001), indicating that about 14% of matings occurred between genetically related plants.