“highly significant”

However, for both groups, the path was highly significant ( p < .001) albeit slightly more pronounced in the LD group ( b = − 0.237, t = -4.925, p < .001; b = − 0.127, t = -4.479, p < .001, respectively for the LD group and the control group).

Single, double, and triple asterisks indicate differences that are statistically significant ( P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) or highly significant ( P < 0.001), respectively.

The prolongation of sonication time from 5 to 30 min (10 min/on and 2 min/off) resulted in a corresponding highly significant decrease in PS ( p < .001) from 1661.71 ± 15.72 nm to 626.09 ± 13.51 nm, respectively.

The pre-operative Lüscher score (4.8 ± 1.8) was found to be statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001) compared to the post-operative Lüscher score (4.0 ± 1.7) [ Table 2 ; Figure 1 ].

In addition, results highlight that past exposure to risk while travelling is a highly significant factor distinguishing the tourist segments ( p = 0.001).

After a 6-week treatment period, the measurements for OGTT and AUC in the Metformin, Low dose, and High dose groups demonstrated significant reductions compared to the DM group, with highly significant differences noted ( p < 0.001).

Specifically, 90% of the total molecular variance was attributed to differences among accessions, whereas only 10% was explained by variation within accessions, with both components being highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Age Differences Between Diagnostic Groups Age differed markedly across the four main diagnostic categories; the global comparison showed a highly significant difference in age between groups (Kruskal–Wallis H(3) = 45.0, p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).

When testing for the significance of covariates, the intermolar width (in mm) was found to be highly significant ( P < .001) after applying the one-sample t-test, whereas no statistical difference was found in the gender groups ( P = .108).

All correlations were highly significant ( P < 0.001) apart from those between birthweight and the 8, 12, 17, and 22 weeks weight of Av BW pigs ( P < 0.05).

The correlation coefficient between growth of new cases and Google search interest (past 7 days) is highly significant ( r = 0.65, p < 0.001).

In this case, log-transformed data were fitted to a linear regression model, resulting in an estimated decay rate of d = -0.0310 ±0.0037 h -1 ( R 2 = 0.549, F 1,57 = 69.510, P < 0.001). Interestingly, the loss of infectivity in cell-free media was 3.35-fold faster compared to that in a media containing cell lysates, being the difference between both conditions highly significant ( t 78 = 32.925, P < 0.001).

The difference was highly significant ( P = 0.001).

reported a highly significant improvement in the Boston Naming Test (BNT, pre-treatment: 20.75 ± 4.49, post-treatment: 22.75 ± 4.28, p < 0.001) [ 41 ].

35.5 ± 8.6 cm, mean difference, −22.6; 95 % CI, −19.5 to −25.8; p < 0.001) as well as the difference between the relative changes in pain scores proves to be highly significant (p < 0.001) in favor of the test product.

The difference was highly significant ( t = −29.12, p = 0.001).

The non-parametric Mann–Kendall test yielded a highly significant monotonic decrease ( z = −9.03, τ = −0.282, p < 0.001).

Blood loss and uterine artery seal Average blood loss during hysterectomy with vessel sealers was 111±53.31 ml versus 320±193.90 ml with sutures, the difference being highly significant (p=0.001) (Figure 3 ).

Majority (54.2%) of the EOS culture-positive babies were of low birth weight as compared to EOS culture-negative babies (19.2%), and the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Although this average for 44 countries (2009–2019) was only moderately above that of the HDI for all 189 countries in both 2009 (mean 0.677 ± 0.157) and 2017 (mean 0.709 ± 0.152), the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney U test).

Combined Model 1, integrating the Evans Index, callosal angle, and DESH score, achieved a highly significant AUC of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.66–0.85; p < 0.001), with 74.0% sensitivity and 70.6% specificity.

Serum Amyloid A (SAA) The two-way mixed ANOVA revealed a highly significant Group × Time interaction for SAA (F 2 , 46 = 8.76, p < 0.001), indicating that the temporal pattern of SAA differed between the gallop and endurance groups ( Figure 1 ).

After adjusting for multiple testing with the Bonferroni-Holm method ( Holm, 1979 ), all group differences remained highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The effect of fertility status of the bulls was highly significant ( P < 0.001) for JAC and ABL accounting for 47.64 and 21.65% of the total variance observed in the produced MFI upon lectin binding.

All coefficients were statistically highly significant (p<0.001).