“highly significant”

With respect to between-group comparisons, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups in the pretest median Trait Anger scores ( p = 0.291, ES = 0.447, 95% CI: −0.370, 1.250), whereas a highly significant difference was detected between the groups in the posttest median Trait Anger scores ( p < 0.001, ES = 1.481, 95% CI: 0.560, 2.380).

(3) Consistency between C-DOS and C-ONI The two tools demonstrated a highly significant statistical association in binary classification [χ 2 (1) = 200, p < 0.001; OR = 42.8, 95% CI: 20.3–90.2]; however, their agreement was only moderate [κ = 0.50], with 65 cases (9.4%) being classified discordantly.

However, training demonstrated a highly significant effect ( P < .001), as practitioners who received training scored higher (mean = 70.91, SD = 3.335) compared to those without training (mean = 62.72, SD = 2.963).

Its amplitude is more expressed when the target was present (M = -1.72, SD = 2.01), to when it was absent (M = .28, SD = 1.77), and this impression was confirmed by the rmANOVA with a highly significant main effect of target presence (F(1, 26) = 21.90, p < .001, n p 2 = .457).

One-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences among groups (F(3,8) = 3054.65, p < 0.001).

Statistical significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05, while p < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and p < 0.001 indicated very highly significant differences.

3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ) Statistical analysis confirmed these differences to be highly significant (log-rank test, p < 0.001).

The highly significant differences observed in temporal synergy parameters (e.g., p < 0.001) suggest that dopaminergic medication substantially affects motor coordination, even within this cohort.

The Chi-square test revealed a highly significant difference ( χ 2 = 20.92, df = 1, P < 0.001), which was further confirmed by Fisher’s exact test ( P = 9.50 × 10 -6 ).

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that ammonia nitrogen concentration had a highly significant effect on the ventilation frequency of rainbow trout ( F = 24.63, p < 0.001).

This increase however, was found to be highly significant ( P = 0.001) [ Table 10 ].

Based on the trajectories (0, 1.169, 0.620, and 0.241, respectively for Group I; Group II; Group III, and Group IV) which are highly significant (p<0.001) at all the time intervals, the data suggests that progression of lens abnormalities and maturation of cataract due to STZ-induced hyperglycemia were significantly delayed with feeding of ginger in a dose dependent manner ( Figure 1B ).

Notably, highly significant associations (FDR adjusted p < 0.001) were observed between S. undulatus and the dominant flea species, C. tesquorum and F. elatoides , with edge widths reflecting the high flea counts (620 and 560 individuals, respectively).

SPSS 27.0 independent-samples t tests revealed highly significant regional differences in fat, protein, and total-solid contents ( p < 0.001), whereas lactose levels were statistically equivalent; full results are presented in Table 1 .

However, social norms were highly significant (p < 0.001).

The significance of associations between variables were as follows: in the metabolism of carbohydrates and in the transcription and translation, highly significant in both ( p -value < 0.001); in the biosynthesis of amino acids, not significant ( p -value > 0.05); and in the metabolism of energy, marginally significant ( p -value slightly greater than 0.05).

Significant reductions were observed in the RFB group ( p < 0.05) and the MT group ( p < 0.01), while the CT group showed a highly significant decrease ( p < 0.001).

There is a highly significant change in the −2LL, χ 2 (1, N = 439) = 121.45, p < 0.001.

In this group, repeated measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant and robust main effect of time on the outcome measure (F (3, 15) = 198.98, p < 0.001), with a very large effect size (partial η 2 = 0.975).

The relationship between stimulation location and reported sensation was highly significant (χ 2 (5) = 34.3, p < 0.001).

The analysis of differences in biochemical markers (TBA, AST, ALT, TBIL, and DBIL) and the clinical symptom of pruritus reached highly significant levels ( P < 0.001), strongly indicating that the severity of ICP is closely related to these biochemical changes and symptoms.

This new model showed a substantial increase in statistical significance, reaching a highly significant level ( p < 0.001) as indicated in Table S4 .

In addition, the type of closure showed a highly significant difference ( P = 0.001), as extra-peritoneal closure was predominantly used in rectal tumors (78.8%).

Indeed, the correlation between tumour epithelial pEGFR and CB 1 IR was highly significant (Spearman's r value 0.30, n = 280, p<0.001).

This was evidenced by their Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS), Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), and Short Sensory Profile (SSP) scores (27.47 ± 7.95, 71.59 ± 11.55, and 156.47 ± 20.17, respectively), with a highly significant reduction in sensory hypersensitivity ( p = 0.001) compared to the WLT group, which presented more severe scores on CARS (35.89 ± 8.96), SRS (81.72 ± 7.68), and SSP (133.67 ± 11.65).