“highly significant”

3.6 Comparative analysis of exam anxiety across related factors ( N = 1,519) The analysis of academic, health and life style variables demonstrates that several key factors are highly significant predictors of exam anxiety ( p ≤ 0.001).

The interaction effect of the gain or loss situation and childhood SES was highly significant, F (1, 105) = 20.54, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.16; see Figure 1 .

The overall model was highly significant (likelihood ratio chi 2 = 70.72, p < 0.001), indicating a good fit for identifying key predictors of mortality among hospitalised people with diabetes in Lubumbashi.

Relationship between internal load, sleep, and physical well-being On physical well-being, the calculated LMEM showed a highly significant effect of previous-day internal load (b = -0.001 [0.00004], t(2365.26) = -15.1, P < .001, η 2 p = 0.09 [0.07, 0.11]) and previous-night sleep quality (b = 0.23 [0.01], t(2655.24) = 16.41, P < .001, η 2 p = 0.09 [0.07, 0.11]).

In addition, Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was highly significant (χ2 = 1725.932, df = 91, p < 0.001), confirming that correlations among the variables were strong enough to justify the use of factor analysis.

The lowest phenolic content was recorded at 1 TU ZnO, while the highest was observed at 1 TU Zn, with all differences being highly significant ( p < 0.001; Figure 3 a).

48 hours after cell seeding all groups except PCL/Coll 75% (not significant) displayed a highly significant ( P < 0.001) relative increase of metabolically active cells compared to the 24 h groups ( Figure 2(a) ).

Phenotypic variation in bambara groundnut germplasm Highly significant (p < 0.001) genetic variation was observed among all morphological traits in the studied accessions ( Table 5 ).

For methane, the ANOVA also revealed a highly significant difference between treatments ( p < 0.001).

The BT term was found to be highly significant ( p < 0.001) when incorporated into the models for all species except American plaice and golden redfish.

In contrast, stage II–IV patients displayed persistent, highly significant OS benefits (all P < 0.001), consistent with a systematic review from the Cancer Care Ontario Program [ 24 ].

The difference in the proportion of patients achieving NEDA on high efficacy drugs and the odds ratio of achieving NEDA were lower for the second drug, but still highly significant ( p < 0.001).

There was a highly significant difference between the 3 groups ( p < 0.001).

In both cases, the difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The mean PTH, Ca, P, and vitamin D values of the patients with PHPT and control group were highly significant, and all the parameters of the patient group showed higher values than the control group except for the P values ( P < .001).

A Kruskal–Wallis test indicated that these differences were highly significant, H (3) = 821.94, p < .001, Cohen's d = 1.37.

A Generalized Linear Model was used to estimate the effect of age group, race and rural status on the probability of missed HPV inoculation opportunity, all effects were highly significant as was the overall model (P<0.001).

The statistical parameters confirm the hypothesis that the differences between the results are either not significant (p > 0.05), significant (0.001 < p < 0.05) or highly significant (p < 0.001).

When we analyzed our data after including as few as 6 randomly selected cluster size measurements per cell, a Kruskal–Wallis test gave highly significant p-values for three cultures (p = 0.001, n = 174 sites (6 *29 cells)) and five cultures (p = 0.005, n = 294 sites (6 *49 cells)).

Cells were harvested 24 hours post transfection to assess GFI1 expression levels by quantitative RT-PCR, revealing a highly significant down regulation of both GFI1 RNA (p < 0.001) (Fig. 4A ).

None of these announced activities would actually take place, and while participants prepared for them they were asked to take part in an allegedly separate experiment on economic decisions (see Methods). Results Validation of the motive inductions A linear mixed effect model on change in motivational and affective ratings (i.e., difference scores between post-induction and pre-induction ratings) resulted in a highly significant interaction between the induction and the motive/affective state (F (16,1536) = 4.59, p < 0.001), suggesting that the latter were differentially affected by the inductions (Fig. 1 , panel B).

At day 8, the difference between escape latency of targeted NPs treated group was highly significant (p < 0.001) with all other groups and it was almost similar to control group.

While a uniform main effect of exercise on sEMG amplitude (RMS, MAV) was not observed, the analysis revealed robust and highly significant exercise × muscle interactions ( p < 0.001 for both RMS and MAV), consistent with prior evidence that exercise effects on sEMG are muscle-specific [ 37 ].

The results indicated that the composite reliability (CR) of all items or sub-constructs was above 0.7 and highly significant at the p = 0.001 level, and the average variance extracted (AVE) ranged from 0.525 to 0.812, which was highly above the recommended criterion of 0.50.

The main effect of the dose was highly significant ( p < 0.001).