“highly significant”

For chronic NOEC REACH data (European Commission 2006), the relationship with the chronic high‐quality nonextrapolated SSD midpoint data was less strong than for the EC50 data but still highly significant (A; overlapping number of compounds 251, y = 0.7448 x + 0.8502, R 2 = 0.60, p < 0.001).

As a sensitivity analysis, we repeated the baseline versus postexposure comparison after excluding the three subjects with the highest postexposure LTL values and found that the increase in LTL was still highly significant (baseline: 1.22 ± 0.28; postexposure: 1.34 ± 0.35; p = 0.001).

The analysis also showed that these effects were interdependent: the interaction between the two factors was highly significant ( P < 0.001), and blocking UV decreased attack rates in sp items (with more eyespots) but increased attack rates in wt items (with fewer eyespots) ( Fig. 3 ).

Overall, between-method correlation was highly significant for aldosterone concentrations ( R = 0.945, p < 0.001) and less strong but significant for DRC/PRA ( R = 0.422, p < 0.001).

Statistically significant results were denoted by a value of P < 0.05, while the results were considered highly significant when value of P < 0.001 was obtained.

Results On comparing sialic acid levels among the three groups, stage 2 showed the highest mean (8.61) compared with the other two groups and was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Conversely, the iodine and acid values were significant (p < 0.05) but saponification and ester values were higher and highly significant (p < 0.001) in native.

The results show that the difference of palmitic acid (C16:0), linolenic acid (C18:3), unsaturated fatty acid (UFA) and saturated fatty acid (SFA) between provinces was highly significant ( p < 0.001) and might be used as markers for the identification geographical origin. 3.2.2.

The chemical-genetic interaction of the positive control methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), a well-characterized antifungal agent that damages DNA [ 28 ], demonstrated a highly significant enrichment ( P value ≤ 0.001) for cellular response to DNA damage stimulus, confirming a successful HIP-HOP assay procedure and accurate post-sequencing data analysis.

Many authors define the cutoff value of the normal ONSD as (5 mm) which supports our cutoff point gained from the control group to compare it with the corresponding values of the patients.[ 9 13 ] The current study found a highly significant statistical correlation between ONSD with direct measurement of ICP ( R = 0.933 and P < 0.001), this result goes with the latest studies done in Rome, Italy, that was performed in 2017 by Toscano et al. whose found a strong correlation between ONSD and ICP ( R = 0.895 and P < 0.001).[ 14 ] Another

The results indicated highly significant improvements in all 14 physical and cortical functional assessments by the end of the PAC program ( P < 0.001).

Lead and Cd were highly significant (p = 0.001), followed by Fe.

Patients with non-luminal breast cancer (HER2-positive and triple-negative) were more inclined to present focal edema than those with luminal breast cancer with a statistically highly significant p -value ( p < 0.001) (Fig. 1 b and d).

This indicates that pretest and post-tests within Group A and Group B on asthma patients show a highly significant difference in mean values at P ≤ 0.001 (Table 1 and Table 2 ).

The LMM model ( Table 3 ) identified highly significant effects ( p < 0.001) for the measurement values of FBG and for the interaction between group and measurement of FBG before (t0) and after (t1) the 3-month treatment.

With the addition of PL, the ternary SDs showed highly significant (***, p < 0.001) changes in the SL release profile ( Fig. 3 ).

In a trend test, i.e., using the number of patient transfers as a continuous variable, it was also highly significant in relation to back injury events ( p < 0.001).

Domains for social function and self-esteem (questions 1—13) demonstrated a highly significant improvement following surgery ( P = 0.001—0.008).

The difference in prevalence among the four groups was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Case Fatality Rate Trend Poisson regression analysis demonstrated a highly significant annual decline in case fatality rate (RR 0.976 per year, 95% CI 0.973–0.978; p < 0.001), corresponding to an average reduction of 2.4% per year.

The length of the periods between throws in the eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions did not differ (Wilcoxon Z = 1.01, p =0.311) and correlated at highly significant level (Spearman R = 0.88, p < 0.001).

For metabolism, a highly significant overall treatment effect was found (PMT: F(7, 41.506) = 42.829, p < 0.001), and this effect was even more pronounced for viability (PVA: F(7, 39.861) = 88.926, p < 0.001), indicating that viability provided high sensitivity for treatment discrimination.

ANOVA revealed highly significant treatment effects on disease progression parameters [F(8,18) = 1778.20, p < 0.001].

6 of these features were highly significant (p < 0.001, Wald test) after correction for multiple testing, and were selected for the multivariable model: Brock score, Herder score, a history of lung disease, a history of extra-thoracic malignancy, nodule density and PET avidity.

There was a highly significant moderate negative correlation between the NHPT durations and the ALFRS-R: handwriting scores ( r = −0.53, p < 0.001).