“highly significant”

Serum levels of calcium and the calcium/phosphorus ratio were decreased, and phosphorus levels were increased, which were highly significant (p < 0.001) in patients with RA compared to healthy controls (Jambale and Halyal 2017 ).

Separate analyses revealed that the effect of Condition was highly significant in L1 ( F (1, 1939.5) = 23.8, p < 0.001), but there was no such effect in L2 ( F (1, 1939.5) = 1.35, p = 0.246).

In contrast, there was a highly significant reduction ( p < 0.001) in the viability of neurons when they were cultured in media conditioned by 80 dFD C9-mutated compared with control astrocytes.

A Kruskal-Wallis test yielded a highly significant effect of story path on participant satisfaction, χ2(3) = 35.77, p < .001.

The mean values of R0 and fr presented highly significant increases in smoking patients (p < 0.001 and p < 0.002, respectively).

amplicon sequencing gut microbiome methodology Tephritidae Ceratitis capitata Permutational multivariate analysis of variance revealed a highly significant interaction of preservation and life stage (at P < 0.001) as well as a significant interaction of preservation and dissection (at P = 0.047) ( Table 1A and Supplementary Table S8a ).

ICU admission also revealed a highly significant difference between survivors (20 out of 84) and non-survivors (10 out of 16), with a p-value of <0.001, as shown in Table 3 .

In all models, age, sex and meal location were highly significant predictors (all p < 0.001).

Because the 95% confidence interval is relatively narrow for this effect and does not include 0, these findings can be interpreted as a medium summary effect that is positive, precise, and highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Analysis of Likert questions shows an equally significant increase in confidence or strong agreement from pre to post-test across all measured areas, with highly significant p -values ( p < 0.001) in many cases.

Notably, a highly significant positive correlation is observed between the AUC (Area Under the Curve) of the Delay and Social discounting tasks ( p < 0.001).

This shows a very highly significant relationship between those who are familiar with firearms and the risk of suicide (OR = 2.09, P < 0.001), expressing double suicide rate in those with an identified exposure to weapons.

Independent sample t -test demonstrated highly significant difference between the two groups (p < 0.001).

SIV ANOVA 2x2x2x6 showed highly significant results for the interaction between Groups, Gender and SIV (F = 2.25; df = 5/350; p < 0.001) and the interaction: Gender x Time x SIV (F = 2.77; df = 10/700; p < 0.01).

The loci HA3 and HA13 showed highly significant P values (P < 0.001) after Bonferroni correction, therefore all further analyses were conducted without locus HA3, due to linkage disequilibrium ( Table 3 ). 3.2 Genetic diversity The related parameters of genetic diversity were calculated and summarized in Table 4 , Table 5 .

The time domain parameter SDNN shows a highly significant decrease in T2DM patients compared to healthy controls ( P < 0.001).

Highly significant (p < 0.001) multilocus departures from HW proportions were found for most populations and significant (p < 0.05) for populations 2 and 20.

Of these, 226 loci (FDR 0.30) showed significant (p<0.05) inverse correlation between gene expression and methylation, with 77/819 (FDR 0.03) being highly significant (p<0.001) ( Supplementary Table S7 , Figure 5 ).

Mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration (MCHC) was less in both than in C, by small but highly significant amounts (0.46 (0.27, 0.65); 0.33 (0.09, 0.58) g/dl, respectively, p < 0.001 & = 0.008, age and gender adjusted).

There was a highly significant reduction in all aspects of stress among the intervention and control groups during posttest (F 2 = 10.77, p < 0.001) [ Table 1 ].

Total PSQI score : The overall PSQI score showed a highly significant effect of time (F( 1, 27 ) = 42.35, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.39).

We achieved a highly significant accuracy of [73.3 ± 3.7]% ( Figure 4 B left end and Figure 4 C top left, t-test p < 0.001).

The differences in hazards ratios between consecutive groups were highly significant ( p -value < 0.001) for all comparisons except for Step 2 vs Step 1 ( p = 0.0522, Table 3 ). 3.3.

( 2017 ), all sampled localities displayed highly significant deviations from Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium ( p = .001 for all).

When considering population and R morphotype divisions, all metrical parameters of M 1 showed highly significant variation (p<0.001) between samples.