“highly significant”

A linear correlation between z-score and in vitro specific activity was confirmed by a highly significant fit line slope ( p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.996).

AMs of both age groups showed high preferential uptake for (-)NPs; however, the aged AM group demonstrated a highly significant ( p < 0.001) decrease in uptake of (-)NPs ( Fig. 4 B ) .

Our results for increased diagnostic certainty of RA were highly significant (31.1% versus 61.2%, P <0.001).

Highly significant differences (p<0.001) were identified in all patients recruited into ADVANCE and the PARTNER-B MM arm for a number of key cardiovascular endpoints including atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, Logistic EuroSCORE and the proportion of patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV HF.

The analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that total variation was highly significant ( p < 0.001) within individuals i.e. 63.17% (Table 6 ).

This reveals a highly significant difference between the Sr/Ca-ratio means (p<0.001) of the gladiators and the NG inhabitants ( Table 5 ).

Antioxidant status The Cr (VI)‐driven oxidative stress in renal tissue was manifested by a highly significant reduction ( p < .001) GSH content (59.16 ± 5.89 nmol/mg) in the kidney for Cr (VI)‐treated rabbits as compared to that of the control group (111.1 ± 3.63 nmol/mg).

The following variables that showed a highly significant statistical difference ( P <0.001) in the univariate analyses were entered a stepwise backward logistic regression model: age; Euroscore; preoperative plasma creatinine level; ScO2 minox ; type of surgery; duration of surgery; duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); lowest hematocrit during CPB; intra- and postoperative use of inotropic/vasoactive agents (noradrenaline, dobutamine, vasopressine); cumulative use of blood products; mean RPP within the first 8 hours after ICU admission, time to first extubation (hours), and reintubation.

The pattern of isolation by distance (IBD) became highly significant after the heatwave (Mantel tests Z = 691.70, r = 0.92, P < 0.001) but was not significant before (Mantel tests Z = 500.99, r = 0.40, P = 0.17).

However, this improvement was temporary, as their function gradually declined over time, resulting in a two-year follow-up HHS of 81.8 (SD: 9.7), which was highly significant (p<0.001).

HTN were highly significant (p<0.001) with large effect sizes (phi-coefficients=0.53-0.69).

When the empathy quotient is zero, the impostor syndrome is estimated at 73.711 with a standard error of 0.821 and is highly significant ( p < 0.001).

1D to a logistic Binomial regression model showed a highly significant effect of hpi (χ 2 = 132.964, 2 d.f., P < 0.001), mostly driven by the very low infectivity observed 36 hpi.

When masculinity preference was regressed on order and time (pre- to post-prime), there was a highly significant effect of order ( z = 4.73, p <.001), but the effect of time was no longer significant ( z = –.84, p = .40).

Price and nutritional value of German 2010 sample (n = 128) Spearman’s rank correlation showed a moderate but highly significant negative association between price and OFCOM score ( R = −0.294, p =0.001) and price and FSANZ score ( R =-0.288, p = 0.001), suggesting that a higher nutrient profiling score is linked to a higher price.

The mice survival rate records, throughout the experimental period, showed highly significant survival rates in the test groups compared to the control group ( P <0.001).

A highly significant correlation between the resected weights and the implant volumes (correlation coefficient 0.744; p < 0.001) was observed.

Results were again highly significant, with past tense frequency (β = 15.35), regularity (β = −36.28), complexity (β = −4.65), and friends (β = −1.68; all p < 0.001) predicting indirect pathway activation ( R 2 = 0.557).

Genetic Variation Highly significant ( p < 0.001) genetic differentiation was found between populations for all traits, with differences among populations the dominant source of variation, particularly for the time to peak flowering ( Table 2 ).

Statistical analysis revealed that there was a highly significant moderate to good relation between forward trunk flexion and RMDQ score (rho = −0.59, p < 0.001).

In contrast, comparing protein levels the difference was found to be highly significant, p <0.001.

The difference in anti-HB titers between anti-HBc positive and negative samples was highly significant ( p < 0.001), being higher in anti-HBc positive samples (median titer anti-HBc negative = 110.2 IU/L and anti-HBc positive = 242 IU/L).

The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between domains indicated that there is highly significant concordance between the four domains ( P < 0.001).

Another important finding of our study was the highly significant difference in in-hospital mortality between cefazolin (19.7%) and flucloxacillin (39.4%) in the treatment of MSSA bacteremia ( p < 0.001).

The impact of performance expectancy on behavioral intention in the chronic conditions group was highly significant (β=.46, P <.001), confirming our rationale that the expectancy of the benefits obtained with the use of mHealth technology to manage health strongly influences the intention of using it for patients with chronic conditions.