“highly significant”

An example of a highly significant d-colocalized pair is THBS1-COL5A1 , which appears as a proximal pair (PP test p-value < 0.001, at d = 4 μm) in ~67% of the 3,147 cells where both genes were detected (Supplementary Fig. 3 ).

The time effect was also highly significant ( F = 19,840.173, p < 0.001, Partial η2 = 0.984), and the interaction between group and time was significant ( F = 984.762, p < 0.001, Partial η2 = 0.876), suggesting that different treatment modalities had varied effects on BDNF expression over time.

All formulas showed highly significant predictive prognostic values (log-rank test, P < 0.001).

Cis/Fen/Az-treated mice showed a highly significant difference in survival when compared to all other groups, on average they survived 27.44 days ( p < 0.001), whereas Cis/Fen- and Cis/Az-treated mice registered an average survival of 16.3 and 17.25 days respectively, thus only slightly longer and with no statistical significance when compared to treatment with cisplatin alone (14.7 days) ( Figure 1 C,D).

To evaluate whether transcriptional signatures based on differential expression analysis could segregate subjects from distinct states of infection, we applied an unsupervised hierarchical clustering on expression data from highly significant DEGs between all groups (ANOVA P < 0.001, 2232 genes), shown in Fig 1C .

Analysis of Statistical Significance Serum and Saliva Superoxide dismutase levels When serum levels of Superoxide dismutase were compared between Group I (4.315 U/mg of Hb) and Group II (2.833 U/mg of Hb), highly significant differences were obtained (p<0.001) ( Table 2 ).

There was a highly significant difference among the 3 groups of patients for these comparisons (all P <0.001).

The factor “sex” alone explained more than 54% of the total variation among flowers and it was highly significant with the lowest possible p -value = 0.001.

However, a significant difference was seen in the heart rate at 0 min (immediately after securing airway devices) in Group I (141.60 ± 14.61 bpm) and Group II (163.49 ± 12.65 bpm) that was highly significant (p≤0.001).

Similarly, the Bartlett’s test of sphericity, which provides a measure of the statistical probability that the correlation matrix has significant correlations among some of its components, was highly significant (χ^2 (21) = 30619.604 ( p < 0.001)), thereby confirming that the variables share common variance and are appropriate for factor extraction.

LMM analysis of trapping success data against time (days), allowing for positive autocorrelation between successive trapping sessions, suggested a highly significant increasing trend across May to December (LMM, P <0.001; parameter estimate = 0.00130±0.00035 catch rate day −1 ).

palmeri differ in all three features measured and the differences are highly significant statistically (p << 0.001).

However, by Day 7, Group B showed a marked increase in resiliency (Mean = 53.58), significantly higher than Group A (Mean = 32.50), with a highly significant p-value < 0.001.

Under salt stress conditions, a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) in the Na + /K + ratio was observed in the leaves, with reduced levels in P. indica -colonized date palms ( Figure 3A ).

Additionally, Fu’s F value was negative and highly significant ( F = − 25.517, P < 0.001), supporting deviations from neutrality.

The interaction of slope orientation and elevation had a significant impact on TK and TP ( p < 0.05) and a highly significant effect on TK, AP, and AK ( p < 0.001). 3.2.

Statistically highly significant (p<0.001) differences were found when comparing transport-related mortality rates in individual seasons of the year.

There were highly significant ( p < 0.001) variations between genotypes, environments, and their interaction for all yield and yield-related traits studied.

Both correlations were highly significant (p common : r = 0.78, p < 0.001; σ A : r = 0.69, p < 0.001).

ultimum alone showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) necrotic areas of tuber slices, no or very little necrotic areas were recorded when slices were treated with S1Bt23 (Fig. 5 B).

This difference was highly significant ( t = −4.055, p < 0.001) and indicates that the effectiveness text module served the intended function. 3.3.

Pearson correlation tests showed that there was a close and highly significant relationship between hippocampal SUVr and escape latency ( r = −0.78, p = 0.001) and percentage of path in the target area ( r = 0.81, p < 0.001) ( Figure 5 ), suggesting a notable correlation between changes in hippocampal glucose and changes in Alzheimer’s cognition after the onset of symptoms.

This decline was statistically significant over the course of the experiment (ANOVA, P = .03), with a highly significant difference by Day 35 ( P < .001) ( Fig. 6B ).

The difference between these two groups was statistically highly significant ( P =0.001).

Results: Mean stain absorption was the highest with nanofilled composite resin (Filtek Z350 XT,3M ESPE) after exposure with light-curing intensity of 325–425 mW/cm 2 and least with microhybrid composite resin (Filtek Z100, 3M ESPE) after exposure with light-curing intensity of 750–850 mW/cm 2 and this difference found was highly significant statistically ( P < 0.001).