“highly significant”

It was observed in the intergroup comparison of Activa Kids, Kedo E max, and FGM Vittra concerning appearance that most of the parents were very satisfied with the Activa Kids pedo shade composite when compared to that of Kedo E max pedo shade and FGM Vittra universal shade composite, with a highly significant difference ( p = 0.001) as illustrated in Table 1 and Figure 8 .

Group membership was highly significant (F(2, 146) = 12.22, p < 0.001) and also remained so after the Benjaini and Yekutieli test ( p < 0.001).

Effect of coating was not significant ( p > 0.05) on shoot N and C content but highly significant for shoot δ 13 C ( p < 0.001), and less significant for shoot δ 15 N ( p < 0.05).

The statistical analyses conducted in the study showed very strong and highly significant correlations ( P <0.001) between WGS mean scores and all the clinical tests used to assess gait.

Although there is no correlation between the mRNA levels of the two aforementioned genes in the overall glioblastoma samples, there is a highly significant positive correlation ( r = 0.6; p < 0.001) in the microvascular proliferation sample subgroup ( Figure 2A ).

Phase 2: psychometric evaluation Construct validity: EFA Prior to EFA, data suitability was confirmed: the KMO measure was 0.86 (acceptable > 0.7), indicating adequate sampling correlations, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (χ2 = 2845.67, df = 666, p < 0.001), rejecting the null hypothesis of an identity matrix.

The correlations in male individuals was strongly negative regarding the carapace length measure (Table 3 ) and remained highly significant even after Bonferroni correction ( r MLH 2 = 0.352, p < 0.001; r IR 2 = 0.352, p < 0.05; r HL 2 = 0.306, p < 0.001).

The ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of the actual base rates on base rate estimates, F (1, 196) = 181.37, p < .001, Cohen’s f = 0.96, BF 10 > 1000.

Our Pearson correlation analysis revealed a highly significant positive correlation for root length, perimeter and volume of the SR, R 2 = 0.95 ( p < 0.001), R 2 = 0.97 ( p < 0.001) and R 2 = 0.87 ( p < 0.001), respectively (Fig. 6 a–c).

The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was .76, and the Bartlett test of sphericity was highly significant (X 2 28 = 4241.7, p <. 001), indicating acceptability to perform the PCA.

the left in LC 3, and the right in LC 4, determining a highly significant hand x loading condition effect: F (3, 57)=14.94; p < 0.001.

Chemical Characteristics Regression analyses revealed highly significant ( p <0.001) linear relationships between the CGW:P ratio and the chemical parameters of pH, EC, TOC, TN, TP, TK, Ca, Mg, and Fe.

The change from baseline to three months showed significant improvement (p=0.061), with the overall progression being highly significant (p<0.001).

That the responses of the varieties to different light conditions were influenced by both genotype and light quality was confirmed by two-way ANOVA, showing a highly significant interaction (p ≤ 0.001) between the factors analyzed (see results in Table 6 ).

Both the results for V V and N V show statistically highly significant differences as confirmed by two-sample T tests (both p < 0.001).

According to the unpaired t-test, a highly significant difference was found between the average stability of the two groups ( P < 0.001).

Overall, the correlation between POCT-Hb and Hb-ZL was highly significant ( r = 0.96, p <0.001).

BAKHF administration achieved highly significant reversals across all tested markers ( P < .001), successfully driving the expression levels of CD31, VWF, ET-1, collagen I, and α-SMA back to baseline levels that were not significantly different from those of the NC group ( P > .05).

All these differences were highly significant (P < 0.001).

There was a highly significant association of sarcopenia and osteoporosis in the whole study group ( p < 0.001) and in female participants ( p < 0.001) and a significant association in men ( p = 0.02) (Fig. 2 ).

A p -value of < 0.05 (*) was considered to indicate a significant difference between groups, with p < 0.01 (**) denoting a highly significant difference, and p < 0.001 (***) indicating an extremely significant difference.

The overall results showed a highly significant interaction between the distances (gap) and the surgical procedures ( p < 0.001), indicating that the difference in force needed to be applied between the different surgical methods varied significantly to reach the same distances.

The model performance was decreased compared to the full model but still highly significant ( r = 0.53, P < 0.001).

Irradiation was also associated with urethral erosion to a highly significant degree (HR, 3.6; CI, 1.92–6.7; P<0.001).

For the HALF‐MIS group, the difference for HDRS‐17 from start to end was 5.55 (highly significant with p = .001) and for the control group the difference was 1.60 (also significant with p = .019).