“highly significant”

The interaction term between SES and a medium severity of COVID-19 has an insignificant coefficient of −0.28 ( p = 0.169), but the coefficient for the interaction term between SES and high severity, with a value of −0.96, is highly significant ( p = 0.001).

A permutation test, randomly distributing the 15 samples (≥20 generations) among three different clades (5 samples for each clade) showed that this replicate-specific clustering is highly significant (10 8 permutations; P < 0.001).

From Table 10 , it can be observed that the difference among the 10 features of all three time-series matrices under two different EMF exposures is highly significant ( p <0.001), indicating that the differences in the selected time-series features of the zebrafish locomotion are important for the EMF exposure in this study.

Based on these results, we retained three NTB variables (semantic fluency, immediate word list recall, and delayed word list recall) that were highly significant predictors (all p < .001) with excellent fit (Max‐rescaled R ‐square = 0.72, Hosmer–Lemeshow Goodness‐of‐fit (GOF) χ 2 = 8.25, p = .41; Max‐rescaled R‐square = 0.66, Hosmer–Lemeshow GOF χ 2 = 8.17, p = .41) for dementia and CI (dementia status and CIND status combined), respectively, within the ADAMS data.

Primary outcome Vertical skeletal measurements According to the analysis of the pre- and post-treatment 3D cephalometric measurements, a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) was observed in the angle between the mandibular and SN planes, which increased by a mean of 0.82 ± 1.37°.

In HEK-293FT ( Fig 2A ), the difference in luciferase expression level was highly significant (p<0.001) from Day 1 where pCpG-free gave ≈ 3 log 10 lower expression than pCpG-rich.

The difference in operative time between the delayed (smaller craniotomy) and emergent (larger craniotomy/craniectomy) cohorts was highly significant (Wilcoxon test: p-value = 0.001; 95%CI: -37.0, -9.0).

Regarding colony diameter, a highly significant difference was observed (F 8,18 = 15.85, p = 0.001).

In contrast, the decrease in bacterial numbers seen after disinfection using the standardised protocol was highly significant (right hand p<0.001, left hand p<0.001).

This median improvement of 70 m was highly significant (p<0.001, Cohens d 0.80).

Statistical analysis of mechanical properties As displayed in Table 11 , both the BaSO4 concentration and the number of fabric layers had a highly significant effect on stiffness ( p < 0.001), with a strong interaction between them ( p ≈ 7.1 × 10−8).

Self-reported exposure and perceived air quality were highly significant for all outcomes ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant correlation was found between the estimated and measured intakes ( r = 0.65, p < 0.001); however, the slope of regression indicated a systematic error in the intake estimation.

Performance in cognitive tests All four cognitive domains had highly significant intercorrelations (P<0.001 each) as shown in Supplementary Table S1 .

Incident reports that GRMs rated as error containing were plotted against the group error scores for these 119 organisational units, and the correlation coefficient of 0.66 was highly significant (95% CI 0.54 to 0.75, p<0.001)( figure 4 A).

In particular, earlier graph-based and CNN-based approaches demonstrate highly significant differences ( p < 0.001), emphasizing the superiority of the proposed method.

Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant relationship between a slight increase in OLR and granule growth ( p < α , p = 0.0010 for R1, p = 0.0023 for R2, and p = 0.0011 for R3) ( Figure 5 ).

In each analysis, all results from the log-rank test were highly significant ( p -values < 0.001; Figures S1 and S2 ).

[ 12 ] demonstrated a highly significant association between the coadministation of proton pump inhibitors (not specified) and clopidogrel resistance in subjects vs. the achievement of a response ( p < 0.001).

A G ‐test of independence showed that the relationship between allele frequency a size was highly significant ( G 1,3 = 51.5, p < .001).

While in the group BH100 a relative ECL of -9.69 ± 4.81 (± 2.52) % was not significant ( p = 1.000) when compared to the control group, the groups BH125 (-19.44 ± 7.30 (± 3.82) %) and even more BH150 (-21.99 ± 6.70 (± 3.51) %) both suffered a highly significant increased relative ECL ( p < 0.001).

difficile with statistically highly significant difference (P < 0.001).

The relationship between F bn and Q n during lung injury representative of early ARDS is different from baseline Performing a KDE test for the F bn -Q n relationship during lung injury compared to baseline, we found a highly significant difference (p < 0.001) showing that the F bn − Q n point clouds at the two time points are not from the same distribution.

All correlations were highly significant ( P < 0.001) apart from those between birthweight and the 8, 12, 17, and 22 weeks weight of Av BW pigs ( P < 0.05).

Test‐retest reliability When n = 116 patients were given the pCPQ twice, that is, before and 30 minutes after drinking the lactose solution, their paired scores for the five items did not change significantly ( P > .05 for all items), while the correlation of items was highly significant ( P < .001 for all items) (Table 3 ).