“highly significant”

Validation of speckle tracking echography The correlation between echocardiographic and sonomicrometric pooled measurements was highly significant (R 2 = 0.98, P <0.001) with a slope close to 1 ( Fig 3 ).

19.5%; p < 0.001), and specific reasons for deferral (such as sexual risk behavior and travel in at-risk areas, the differences being highly significant between each category of blood donation venue; p < 0.001).

There were highly significant differences in serum IL-34 levels observed between these groups according to the Kruskal-Wallis test ( P = 0.001) (Figure 1B ).

Model 1 reveals that, when compared with pretest knowledge scores, the zero-order coefficient for post-test knowledge is positive and highly significant ( p < 0.001).

From the Poisson models ( Table 4 ), bully victimisation was confirmed as a highly significant independent risk factor for GP visits (Incident Rate Ratio (IRR) 1.11, 95% CI:1.05 to1.16; p < 0.001)) and for MHP visits (IRR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.32; p = 0.04), (Model 1).

Highly significant differences (P < 0.001) were found among the three assays for cluster to NTC distance and Cluster spread metrics.

Postoperatively after 24 h, serum lactates values were 3.14 and 2.02 mmol/L in control and cases, respectively, that were found to be highly significant on analysis ( P < 0.001).

All the differences were statistically highly significant between the two groups ( P < 0.001).

During post treatment follow up, there was significant difference in pain relief as measured by the Oxford Knee score from 4 weeks to 6 months, where Group A patients fared much better in terms of pain relief than group B with a highly significant value of P =<0.001 during the time period of 6 weeks to 6 months.

Over the 6-year time span, the difference in the slope of the regression lines between the two seasonal periods was highly significant ( p < 0.001) indicating that the incidence rate of TBE grew more rapidly in the summer-autumn period than in the spring-summer period in response to the unit increase in tick questing rate.

The statistical analysis of data by two-way ANOVA showed that cadmium exposure had a highly significant ( p < 0.001) effect on CA activity.

Correlational analysis indicated highly significant correlations between the electromagnetic HF and EEG activity for the theta range, r = 0.63, p < 0.001, alpha range, r = 0.78, p < 0.001, beta range, r = 0.83, p < 0.001, and gamma range, r = 0.75, p < 0.001.

The P value was highly significant in both tests (P=0.001) ( Table 6 ).

Wald test results for year were consistently highly significant for all focus traits across all models ( p < 0.001 in all cases).

The fact that there were more females than males is statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001, Chi-square test).

A highly significant increase (p<0.001) in dio3 expression was seen between IOP and IOP+T 3 , but not between CTL and T 3 treated groups ( Fig 4A ).

One-way ANOVA analysis of AUC revealed that I/O curve downshift by 0.1 μg/mL LPS was not significant, but highly significant by 0.2, 0.5 and 1.0 μg/mL LPS ( P <0.001, Fig. 1A ).

Correlation of items within factors was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for both meteorism and flatulence (correlation coefficient 0.46) as well as for pain and nausea (0.53), hence convergent validity was supported.

Each model elaboration was highly significant so it was the final model that was employed in the assessment of the hypotheses of interest [χ 2 (1) = 10, p = 0.001; χ 2 (5) = 55, p < 0.0005].

Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant [Χ 2 (465) = 11445.2, p < 0.001], indicating sufficiently large correlations between the genes to permit FA.

Population genetic structure and phylogeographic examination The one-level AMOVA gives evidence for strong and highly significant genetic differentiation among the examined populations of C. aestuarii based on Tajima-Nei distances ( Φ ST = 0.615, P < 0.001) and haplotype frequencies ( F ST = 0.109, P < 0.001).

The following correlations were highly significant: IPDE paranoid and attachment (0.443, p< 0.001), cognitive (0.359, p< 0.001), dominance (0.381, p< 0.001), emotional (0.398, p< 0.001), and total (0.386, p< 0.001); IPDE antisocial and behavioural (0.42, p< 0.001), cognitive (0.377, p< 0.001), dominance (0.354, p< 0.001), emotional (0.348, p< 0.001

Results Univariable analysis revealed the highly significant impact of the fixation technique on the seroma rate (non-fixation 0.7% vs. tacks 2.1% vs. glue 3.9%; p < 0.001).

C 4 ) was highly significant ( p < 0.001), and so it was between the roots of the C 3 and C 4 plants ( p < 0.001).

The frequency-dependent differences at 3, 4 and 6 kHz, which statistically describe the observed drop in the hearing curve are highly significant ( p < 0.001).