“highly significant”

There was little evidence of diurnal variability in concentrations of viruses, though there were some highly significant trends ( p < 0.001). pH and turbidity of wastewater In the effluent samples collected at Betws-y-Coed, higher pH values were observed during the summer sampling event (median pH 7.36) than during the autumn and the winter sampling campaigns (median pH 6.79 and 6.62, respectively; Fig. 2 ) with little variation evident during the sampling events (Fig. 3 d–f).

QGSGS findings suggested that a highly significant improvement in scar severity was seen after all modalities ( P < 0.001); namely, an excellent to very good rating was found in 46.7% of the PRP group, 26.7% of the TCA CROSS group and 60% of the PRP with microneedling group.

Valuable information was obtained suggesting that MEAN, SD, %AREA, COMP, Skewness, IDM and Contrast had highly significant differences when related to the Fibrosis Stage (FS) (p<0,001) and ASM had significant differences (p<0,05).

When p RBCs were the target cells, there was a highly significant positive correlation between anti-Neu5Gc IgG and anti-nonGal IgG (P<0.001) ( Fig 5C ).

The log‐rank test indicated a highly significant difference between the two cohorts ( p < 0.001), with a chi‐square (χ 2 ) value of 56.737.

Breed was highly significant at all analyzed timepoints (p < 0.001).

However, highly significant increase (p < 0.001) was observed in the expression levels of SIRT1, Nrf2 and HO-1 in the post-weaning intervention ( Fig. 4 D).

Comparison between Group I and III showed a highly significant difference of bone resorption in ridge width at 3 months 2.56 mm ( P = 0.001) and at 9 months interval 3.2 mm ( P < 0.001).

Correlation analyses of plasma concentrations revealed that the sum of analyzed glycerophosphoethanolamines, Lyso-glycerophosphoethanolamines, Lyso-PC, and carnitine species was not correlated with total SM, but there was a highly significant association with the sum of the PC species ( r = 0.622, P < 0.001).

The comparison of the mean spirometric indices of flour mill and controls groups (mean ±SD) indicates FVC, FEV 1 , and PEFR are highly significant (P<0.001) and FEF 25 % −75 % are significant (P<0.01).

The results were considered significant if p < 0.05 (*), very significant if p < 0.01 (**), or highly significant if p < 0.001 (***). 5.

Correlations of the Level of ED and the Severity of ID Correlational analyses between the SED-S and the severity of ID revealed highly significant ( p < 0.001) negative associations for the overall score (r s = −0.753).

The chi-squared test for heterogeneity was highly significant (I 2 = 78.1%, P < 0.001).

In addition, the independent samples t -test was used to compare the mean difference of pairs of variables [ 23 ]. P ≤0.05 represented a significant difference, P ≤0.01 represented a highly significant difference, and P ≤0.001 represented a very highly significant difference.

Moreover, highly significant differences were found when comparing accumulation of each HM in snail hepatopancreas with that in foot (Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb: p < 0.001).

For tool images, we also found a main effect of salience [ F (1,636) = 10.211, P = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.059] and a highly significant salience x phase interaction [ F (2,1107) = 27.780, P < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.318].

The environmental data describing air pollution resulted in different patterns where NO showed highly significant correlations with season and PM 10 with day of the week (all p values <0.001).

On the other hand, the values of total N content in CGE and GDE were similar but highly significant ( P < 0.001) compared to total N content in OGR (Table 2 ).

The Phi PT between particular populations with K > 2 (chromosomes 1A, 4A, 5A, 2B, 3B, 2R, and 3R) was highly significant ( p < 0.001) and varied from 0.015 (between Pop2 and Pop3 for chromosome 3R) to 0.351 (between Pop2 and Pop3 for chromosome 2R) ( Table 4 ).

RM ANOVA showed a highly significant effect of OBX model ( F (1,20) = 81.42, p < 0.001), feeding status ( F (1,20) = 20.99, p < 0.001), day ( F (9,180) = 1175.89, p < 0.001), day*OBX model interaction ( F (9,180) = 81.90, p < 0.001) and day*feeding status interaction ( F (9,180) = 14.80, p < 0.001).

As expected, highly significant differences were observed in cortical regions ( p < 0.001) when comparing 18 F-Flut(+) and 18 F-Flut(–).

Two highly significant ( p < 0.001) molecular signatures were identified by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of BAP1 calling-card target genes associated with gene expression response to BAP1 depletion (see Additional file 7 ): an Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) signature was associated with up-regulated genes; and a polycomb-mediated lysine27-trimethylation of histone H3 in Embryonic Stem Cells was associated with down-regulated genes (Fig. 4d ).

The association between the prevalence of LVD and the initial diagnosis/differential diagnosis was highly significant ( p <<0.001) whereas none of the other associations attained statistical significance ( Table 6 ).

In fact, the chi-square goodness of fit test for the first ten bases flanking the 11 CR1s containing one perfect octomer and intact ORF2s and 3' UTRs was highly significant ( X 2 = 39.5; P < 0.001) suggesting that the occurrence of specific bases within those first ten flanking positions was not random.

The main effect of group was highly significant ( b = −59.60, SE = 5.70, t = −10.46, p < .001), confirming substantial differences between Autism and Comparison groups.