“highly significant”

In contrast, the comparison between Dublin fishmongers and takeaways was highly significant ( R = 0.182, p = 0.001), with the SIMPER results demonstrating average dissimilarity of 69.89% between samples (with the highest contributions originating from the blonde and spotted rays, each contributing about a third of the total dissimilarity).

To compare the accuracy of factors identified by regression analysis, we included the three factors with highly significant results ( p < 0.001; age, life satisfaction, and cognitive level) and the six factors with significant results ( p < 0.05; age, final educational level, residential area, regular exercise, life satisfaction, and cognitive level) in the comparison.

A highly significant difference between the two groups was found regarding HBsAb titer ( p <0.001).

In the groups of half tablets (split by knife or cutter) a strong positive ( r ≥ 0.947), highly significant ( p < 0.001) correlation was found between weight and drug content, indicating a good tablet content uniformity.

Highly significant differences (p-value < 10-3) were obtained in the case of the tests conducted for explicit bias.

The association between MVO and myocardial salvage was highly significant also after adjustment for covariates [β/SE (β)] = −6.93, p<0.001.

The differences were highly significant ( P < 0.001), in s.TC, S.TG, s.LDL-C, and HDL-C compared with that of the negative control.

The SNPs that did not match the following criteria were removed before performing population diversity analyses: (i) SNPs with call rates less than 90%, (ii) SNPs with minor allele frequencies less than 5%, (iii) SNPs with more than 1% missing genotypes, and (iv) SNPs displaying highly significant deviations ( P -value < 10 −3 ) from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium ( Amaral, Pavão & Gama, 2020 ).

In reference to the history of abusive behavior exhibited by husbands during pregnancy, violent behavior towards family members, abusive behavior towards his relatives or friends, escalation of violence, substance abuse, general antisocial behavior, criminality and mental health issues showed a highly significant association with the occurrence of IPV ( P < 0.001) as presented in Table 3 .

The sampling adequacy was acceptable (overall KMO = 0.74; item MSAs: 0.69–0.91), and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant (χ 2 (10) = 217.66; p < 0.001), confirming sufficient inter-item correlations.

However, a highly significant decrease in the proliferation of labelled neonatal chondrocyte cells was observed in comparison to unlabelled control cells after 2 days of culture ( p < 0.001).

Behavioral data on the task This analysis revealed a highly significant main effect of direction (F1,91) = 85.12; P < 0.001; pη 2 = 0.48); participants were slower to respond to looming stimuli than receding stimuli (mean loom = 468.14 [s.e. = 14.16]; mean recede = 419.54 [s.e. = 10.25]).

Adjusted CPSS differences after 4 weeks were −8.8 [95% CI: −10.8; −6.8] (mean 24.2 [22.2; 26.2]) in the intervention group and −1.0 [−2.9; 0.9] (mean 32.0 [30.1; 33.9]) in the control group, resulting in a highly significant group difference ( P < 0.001).

As regard nasal obstruction, highly significant difference towards group I with intranasal steroids, when compared with group II with intranasal saline 6 months ( P = .001) and 1 year ( P = .031) postoperatively.

Similar to alcohol consumption, physical inactivity shows a strong association with obesity in our findings, with highly significant differences across all formulas ( p < 0.001), for both sexes and across both worker groups.

Highly significant positive correlations were observed for WGC across all environments, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.63 to 0.91 ( p < 0.001).

The mean CCT difference between the devices was highly significant, and their measurements were highly correlated (ICC = 0.90, P ≤ 0.001).

Consequently, the value of amylase after treatment had a highly significant difference as compare its level before treatment(P< 0.001).

Thus, for multivariable analysis, T class was divided dichotomously in T0-2 vs T3-4, providing a highly significant prognostic stratification (Table 1 ; HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.17–0.44, p < 0.001).

1 a), which was supported by a highly significant clone effect in the PERMANOVA (pseudo-F = 74.00, R 2 = 0.32, P = 0.001).

The PTEN/microalbuminuria ratio was progressively lower in the control group (0.099 ± 0.076) than in the DM without complications (0.055 ± 0.005) and DM with microalbuminuria (0.003 ± 0.008) groups, with all comparisons being highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The experimental group showed a significant overall change in physical scores over time ( p = 0.005), with a highly significant improvement immediately after the intervention ( p < 0.001).

On average, the follow-back rate by the liberal cluster of noncore accounts is 51.0%, whereas for conservative clusters it is 61.8%, which is a highly significant statistical difference ( t (179774) = –90.26, p < 0.001 (two-tailed), Cohen’s d = 0.40).

Furthermore, the drug release from the CA-NLC-gel formulation was highly significant ( p < 0.001) when compared with the Mkt-gel formulation after 24 h.

However, our univariate ANCOVA revealed only highly significant associations between ICU and RPQ scores [ F (1, 128) = 38.67, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.232] and CUDIT and RPQ scores [ F (1, 128) = 5.02, p = 0.03, η 2 = 0.038].