Highly significant association were found between education and CIN (X 2 = 63.694; df=1; p<0.001), age of marriage and CIN (X 2 = 24.023; df=1; p<0.001) and parity and CIN (X 2 = 20.338; df=1; p<0.001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
However, the effect of genotype on lifespan was highly significant (Z = 14.557, P<0.001).
Results Growth Attributes For shoot and root length, data showed a highly significant (p < 0.001) difference in drought, varieties and foliar applied ASA with significant interactions among these factors at vegetative stage of chickpea showed in Table 1 .
These differences were reflected in the one-way ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis tests, which remained highly significant (p<0.001) even after correction for multiple comparisons ( Table 2 ).
The differences between groups were highly significant ( P < .001).
A quantitative analysis of lipid oxidation, using thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARSs), revealed that the OC and OCEL groups exhibited markedly lower values than both the control (CON) and the linseed-only (EL) groups, with highly significant differences ( p < 0.001).
Among those, 12 were macroscopically classified as acute, this association being highly significant ( p < 0.001).
A two-factorial ANOVA yielded no significant effect for the factor experiment (F = 1.13; P = 0.38) and a highly significant random effects factor subject (F = 11.35; P<0.001).
Chi-square test showed a highly significant association between ABCD4 genotype distribution and vertebral phenotypes (overall χ 2 = 76.86, df = 6, p < 0.001; Table 3 ).
The logistic regression showed a significant impact of vaginal type of delivery and mothers’ university education in a model used for estimating the above-median RCPM test results for both cohorts (OR 2.32, p < 0.01) and a highly significant impact of mothers’ university education in the Karvina and boys groups (OR 6.60 with p < 0.001 and OR 4.55 with p < 0.01, respectively).
LPS), very significant (##, ** p < 0.01), and highly significant (###, *** p < 0.001). 3.
5 d), and the difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
On the other hand, infections had a highly significant positive effect (47 vs 31%, OR = 2.01, P < 0.001).
In gamergates, which have a much lower basal catalase activity, the reduction was only slight but also highly significant (statistics, see above, t = 8.37, p<0.001).
By contrast, the incidence of complicated CID in the patients treated with oral fluoropyrimidine and intravenous 5-FU was 9% (25/276) and 3% (7/260), respectively, a finding that was highly significant ( p = 0.001).
Highly significant p-values of < 0.001 were obtained for stress, anxiety and depression.
The association between age group and risk group was found to be highly significant ( p value<0.001).
The interaction between the regional location and the dietary treatment was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for a*, b*, Ch*, and H o , and significant for L* ( p < 0.05).
The regression between the selection coefficients of genes (mean of 32 replicates) in CFP strain and YFP strain was highly significant ( F 1,6 = 117, p < 0.001, R 2 = 0.943, slope = 1.007), indicating different fluorescent backgrounds do not interact with this subset of genes, and all measured effects are solely due to the introduced genes.
8 There was also a highly significant increase in the level of pHH3 ( P <0.001), from a MMI of -3.14 in presentation ALL cells to 62.48 in MRD cells. pCREB levels increased from 26.70 to 69.85 ( P <0.01).
For PT, almost every metric showed a highly significant difference between the groups ( P < .001).
The tumor location was a highly significant factor, with tumors of the pelvis resulting in significantly more recurrences than those of the extremities ( p < 0.001).
As shown in Table 2 , high METTL14 expression was identified in 64.2% (174/271) of grade I–II tumor tissue and in 28.3% (36/127) of grade III tumor tissue; the between-group difference was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
In spite of highly significant differences in glucose concentrations at four time points during OGTT (all p<0.001) ( figure 1 ), there was no significant difference in insulin concentrations at four time points.
KMO value was 0.84 while Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant χ 2 = 1057.32, p < 0.001.