Importantly, the critical Time x Group x Solution interaction was highly significant (F = 898.33, p < .001, partial η 2 = .986), demonstrating that the pattern of change over time differed markedly depending on both group and solution combinations.
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
As predicted, WST-1 reduction within this isolated sperm population generated highly significant correlations ( p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.69) between WST-1 reduction and motile sperm count ( Figure 3 A). 3.7.
The GTCS latency of PTZ control was found to be highly significant ( P < 0.001) at 120.10 ± 4.5 seconds compared to normal control.
Fast networks significantly differed from slow networks in all categories ( Fig 4c ), with the differences being highly significant for the case of mixed-selective neurons (more common in fast networks, p < 0.001) and silent neurons (more common in slow networks, p < 0.001).
Both the chi-square and Fisher exact tests revealed a highly significant association between the actual and predicted labels ( P <.001).
The data showed that the correlation of this trait reached highly significant level (p<0.001) among all environmental points.
Highly significant differences in VK2 serum concentrations between controls and MS patients were found ( p < 0.001) with controls showing more than three-fold higher levels on average.
There were highly significant correlations between levels of total nitrogen, microcystin, and microcystin synthesis gene abundance across all surveyed sites ( p < 0.001), suggesting high levels of nitrogen supported the production of microcystin during this event.
We found the same methylation variant of CpG island 2 with a highly significant difference in the overall methylation score of position −4 to +6 in normal weight (23%) versus obese (32%) children (p<0.001) ( Figure 3D–3F ).
Thirty seven out of 41 malignant lesions and 3 out of 22 benign lesions were associated with adjacent vessel, with highly significant difference between benign and malignant lesions ( P < 0.001), especially for lesions smaller than 2.0 cm.
In contrast, in the post-implementation phase, 80 patients had 277 episodes over 1,496 person-days (18.5 events per 100 person-days), representing a highly significant decrease (χ 2 (1)=145.26, p <0.001) following PUSH implementation.
A highly significant positive correlation was obtained between tocopherol content and α-tocopherol (r = 0.97, ***P < 0.001).
Nonetheless, we have increased the sample size from n = 50 to n = 90 and obtained a highly significant correlation, r 90 = -0.40, p < 0.001.
the stx1a AE-STEC EH2282 donor strain was highly significant (between 5.74 and 29.37) at log6 ( p -value < 0.001) and between 4.32 and 23.82 at log5 ( p -value < 0.001) concentrations ( Table S3 ).
Wilcoxon rank-sum tests comparing SSPGI and SDPGI distributions among the short sleep and combined long/intermediate sleep categories, and LSPGI and SDPGI distributions among the long sleep and combined short/intermediate sleep categories, revealed highly significant differences (P<0.001), confirming that SSPGI, LSPGI, and SDPGI effectively distinguish between the respective sleep duration categories.
The value of the LDH is higher in Hegazi (588.71 ± 188.87 U/l) than those of the Shami breed (261.66 ± 20.98 U/l) and this difference is statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Women with a family history of panic attacks were over three times more likely to experience such episodes with a highly significant P value ( P < 0.001), indicating a strong familial link to panic attacks [ Tables 5 and 6 ].
Results The score for color of patches was reduced by 61% in Group A, which was statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001), while it was reduced by 59.75% in Group B, which was also statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).
A one-way ANOVA across these three groups resulted in a highly significant effect: F (2,294) = 23.11, p < 0.001.
Smoking status also demonstrated highly significant differences ( P < 0.001), reflecting shifts in the proportions of current smokers, former smokers, and never smokers across the quartiles.
Including response retrieval as the only level 1 predictor yields a large and highly significant retrieval effect, β = −28.34, t (104,122) = −41.01, p < .001.
Total GPCRND-KOA Score Reductions in mean total GPCRND-KOA score at months 1 and 7 compared to baseline were observed and were highly significant ( P < 0.001 for all comparisons).
The KMO measure of sampling adequacy was 0.921, indicating an excellent level of adequacy, and Bartlett’s test was highly significant (p<0.001).
Mean difference of size of the largest follicle was found highly significant at the level of P < 0.001 Primordial follicle count significantly decreased in Groups C and D compared to that of control group.
After 5,000 bootstrap resamples, the regression coefficients for the paths from PL to TSC (0.413) and from TSC to WSB (0.473) were both highly significant ( p < 0.001).