“highly significant”

Although the association of eGFR with LDL-C lost significance after further adjustment, the associations of eGFR with apoC-III remained highly significant in the fully adjusted model that also accounts for urinary ACR (p = 0.001).

After correction, the association between ARSSS and baseline viral load remained highly significant (p<0.001).

This change was highly significant (p < 0.001), suggesting a vertical decompression effect in the superior compartment of the temporomandibular joint, likely attributable to the splint-induced condylar repositioning and reduction in myofascial load.

However, by Day 7, Group B showed a marked increase in resiliency (Mean = 53.58), significantly higher than Group A (Mean = 32.50), with a highly significant p-value < 0.001.

Both showed highly significant negative correlations [ r = −0.664, t (22) = 4.16, p < 0.001 with the s values and r = −0.926, t (22) = 11.52, p < 0.001 with the l values], which was consistent with the chromatic diffusion.

The factor “sex” alone explained more than 54% of the total variation among flowers and it was highly significant with the lowest possible p -value = 0.001.

There was a highly significant difference among the 3 groups of patients for these comparisons (all P <0.001).

When correlations between scores of items 2, 3 and 4 and self-esteem level were examined, a highly significant correlation ( P < 0.001) was found between items 2, 3 and 4.

The mean reduction in recession depth in group B was 2.04 ± 0.56 mm at the end of three months and 1.82 ± 0.49 mm at the end of six months, both of which were also statistically highly significant ( P < 0.001).

mutans colony counts, a highly significant ( P < 0.001) difference was observed in all the groups.

The time effect was also highly significant ( F = 19,840.173, p < 0.001, Partial η2 = 0.984), and the interaction between group and time was significant ( F = 984.762, p < 0.001, Partial η2 = 0.876), suggesting that different treatment modalities had varied effects on BDNF expression over time.

This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

A highly significant increase ( P < 0.001) in PPD-J specific FoxP3 expressing CD4 + (Figure 8 A), WC1 + (Figure 8 B) and CD8 + (Figure 8 C) T cells was observed in the Sham vaccinated group compared to the HAV vaccinated animals from week 24 onwards (Figure 8 ).

However, for the human isolates, a small but highly significant proportion of the molecular variation was estimated to be between regions within islands (1.03% variation, p<0.001); this finding provided evidence for highly localized geographic structuring.

Thus, P -values of 0.05 < P < 0.10 showed a statistical tendency, a result with P -values of <0.05 was significant, with P < 0.01 highly significant and with P < 0.001 extremely significant.

The increase in bouton number was highly significant in both dGALT -null conditions ( dGALT : 39.4±2.7, n =14, P <0.001; dGALT /Df: 42.5±2.3, n =17, P <0.001) compared with controls (28.1±1.5, n =32), as well as in the ubiquitous dGALT RNAi-knockdown condition ( UH1 -driven: 36.7±1.4, n =20, P <0.0001) compared with controls (26.6 ±1.9, n =13; Fig. 1D ).

In the intergroup comparison among all the test material combinations, Table 3 shows BC (138.19%) demonstrated the highest osteoinduction and odontoinduction properties, followed by MC (111.32%), which was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Thus, at all three time points, expressing hybrid-toxin reduced the LC 50 to a significantly greater extent than AaIT1 ( P < 0.001), and combining AaIT1and hybrid-toxin further reduced effective conidial dose by a highly significant extent ( P < 0.001) ( Fig. 3 ).

Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed that the differences between the FPS scores in both vignette conditions were highly significant (Z = −34.66, p<0.001) indicating a higher level of negative attitudes towards overweight and obesity.

The DSST showed a highly significant association in all the models ( p < 0.001), suggesting that the potential effect of sodium intake on processing speed is stable and may be free from confounding factors.

Paired t -tests comparing individual thresholds between positions confirmed this difference was highly significant ( t (24) = −13.71, p < 0.001) with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = −3.62).

The strong influence of both treatment and time on overall nematode abundance was confirmed by statistical analysis, which revealed highly significant effects of treatment (D; p < 0.001), time (T; p < 0.001), and their interaction (D × T; p < 0.001).

There was however, a highly significant difference in the distribution of diagnosis groups across study years ( p < 0.001).

Pearson’s correlations were highly significant across three modalities of survey administration: paper and pencil, computer and telephone administration (range: .92 to .97, p < .001 ).

In the univariable analysis, fungal growth showed a highly significant association with susceptibility ( p < 0.001, OR = 5.010, 95% CI = 2.687–9.341).