“highly significant”

Management method significantly affected BD and SP ( p < 0.05) but not MC, while management duration exerted highly significant effects on all three parameters ( p < 0.001) ( Figure S1 and Table S1 ).

However, there was a highly significant difference in the total scores according to the presence or absence of AOS (p < 0.001), and while the inter-rater reliability for some individual items was low, the inter-rater reliability for the total score was high at an excellent range.

For E P and E , one-way ANOVA revealed highly significant differences ( F = 40.59 and F = 19.13, respectively; both p < 0.001).

Specifically, a highly significant interaction was observed between irrational beliefs and health anxiety scores with family history of diabetes on 10-year T2DM risk ( p < 0.001).

We verified this by testing the overlap between the TF motif-gene cis -regulations inferred by MLC as applied to the LiCAT-seq human embryonic development dataset, 38 and the cis -regulations inferred by MethCorTarget applied to the DNAme human embryonic development dataset 39 : we found a highly significant overlap, odds ratio OR = 13.3 ( 12.9 − 13.8 ) ( p < 0.001 , Fisher’s exact test).

A highly significant ( p < 0.001) CA of 97.67 ± 1.57% was achieved using O F 1 features from the UoB datasets.

Furthermore, the individual slopes relating autoMAPSE to MAP were highly significant ( P < 0.001) and markedly heterogeneous (both positive and negative), suggesting that ventriculoarterial coupling differs substantially in different individual patients.

The decrease in conidia production in the Δ Fgac1 mutant is highly significant according to t -test (p<0.001).

ANOSIM showed that the microbial community differences between the Malaysian and New York subjects were highly significant with R = 0.69 (p = 0.001).

This difference was highly significant (bootstrapping test confirming more similar fixation maps within than between fixation classes, p < .001).

Studies comparing the highest versus lowest quartiles of UPFs intake ( n = 3) ( 16 , 17 , 23 ) yielded a highly significant and consistent result (ES = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.14–1.32, p < 0.001).

Analysis of variance showed a very highly significant effect of time and dose (P < 0.001).

A highly significant association was observed between pregnancy-risk status and teratogenic medication use (χ2(1)=12.89, p<0.001).

ΔR 2 ranged from 0.508 (for ITS) to 0.759 (for PU), with all F‐change statistics highly significant (p < 0.001), indicating these constructs explain an additional 50.8 to 75.9% of variance over and above controls.

However, PCT levels demonstrated a highly significant decrease over time ( p < 0.001).

Conclusions Our study shows an important, highly significant accumulation of the heterogeneous genotype of the Sirt1 SNP A2191G (Ile → Val) when compared with healthy controls ( P <0.001).

Sperm Motility The sperm motility was scored and it was observed that there was highly significant ( P < 0.001) decrease in the percent sperm motility in Phase I after samples were exposed to Phenol-hydroquinone as compared to normal control samples.

The daily percent mortality of ventilated patients also correlated with the daily census of ventilated patients ( R 2 =0.365, P <.001)—backward multiple regression analysis demonstrated that this positive correlation was still highly significant even when correcting for the average age or gender of ventilated patients ( R 2 =0.4328, P <.001) or for the surge in their number.

Weekly differences were highly significant ( F = 3.22, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.51), indicating that age accounted for a substantial portion of variance.

As seen in Table 1 , the children in the index group (breath holders) showed low threshold of responsiveness while comparing with the control group and the difference is statistically highly significant with the P value <0.001.

The log-rank test for equality of survival curves was highly significant at P = 0.001.

In girls the difference was highly significant (18.3% of the 11 yo, vs. 25.5% of the 15 yo; p<0.001 among age groups).

The highly significant differences observed in temporal synergy parameters (e.g., p < 0.001) suggest that dopaminergic medication substantially affects motor coordination, even within this cohort.

There was a highly significant correlation between each item related to the dentist and the likelihood of the patient to recommend a certain dentist to others “that is, patient loyalty” ( P < .001).

However, training demonstrated a highly significant effect ( P < .001), as practitioners who received training scored higher (mean = 70.91, SD = 3.335) compared to those without training (mean = 62.72, SD = 2.963).