“highly significant”

For the general postoperative complications, a highly significant difference to the disadvantage of the paraesophageal hernias (types II–IV) was detected at 6.0 vs 3.0% ( p < 0.001) (Table 4 ).

Differences were considered statistically significant when P ≤ 0.05 (*), very significant when P ≤ 0.01 (**), and highly significant when P ≤ 0.001 (***).

As none of the matched sets had as much overlap as our height GWAS loci, the enrichment we observed for the height GWAS data is highly significant (p<0.001; z-score: 11.88) ( Figure 3c ).

A P -value of <0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference, P <0.01 was considered highly significant difference and P <0.001 was considered very highly significant difference.

= 3, F = 2.35, p = 0.1) but a highly significant improvement across sessions (d.f. = 3, F = 15.47, p < 0.001) in which the sheep improved from 59.0 ± 7.9% in the first to 89.7 ± 4.8% correct in the fourth session ( figure 4 ).

3.4 Several midstream stations showed lower pollution levels in JDS 3 than in JDS 2 A comparison between the midstream data from 2013 (JDS 3) and 2007 (JDS 2) revealed a similar pollution pattern (see ( Kirschner et al., 2009 )) and a highly significant correlation between the years (rho = 0.738; P < 0.001, n = 48).

The difference between the two groups is highly significant (p < .001).

The MS cohort showed a more frequently positive MRZR (99 of 203 patients: 48.8%) when compared to all other study groups (OIND, bipolar, and schizophreniform patients), and this difference was highly significant (p ≤ 0.001, Table 2 ).

However, we did observe a highly significant positive association (P = 0.001) between having an older age at the time of first anti-schistosomal treatment and the odds of experiencing subfertility ( Table 5 ).

Safety comparison The ddTMZ+mEHT regimen did not display any grade II–IV toxicity, whereas the ddTMZ regimens generated such toxicity events at a rate of 45%–92%, the difference was always highly significant (p<0.001) ( table 9 ).

Importantly, cytotrophoblast hypomethylated blocks have a highly significant 85% overlap ( P -value <0.001) with hypomethylated blocks identified in bulk placental chorionic villi samples ( Fig. 3B ).

Highly significant differences existed between any two sample groups ( P < 0.001).

The majority of NWI caudate lobes were rectangular, whereas UKC ones were irregular; this difference was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001).

Plant Chl content and RWC The effects of SWC, available soil-Pi levels and cowpea varieties were highly significant ( p < 0.001) with regard to the Chl content (Table 1 ).

The test showed that the full model is highly significant for both analyses compared to the additive only model [detailed coordinate system: χ ( 50 ) 2 = 234.54, p < 0.001, V = 0.52; simple coordinate system: χ ( 50 ) 2 = 287.39; p < 0.001, V = 0.47], which in turn is also highly significant compared to the null model [detailed coordinate system: χ ( 51 ) 2 = 220.14, p < 0.001, V = 0.45; simple coordinate system: χ ( 51 ) 2 = 6832.17, p < 0.001, V = 2.55].

Overall, the OR for T2DM was highly significant (OR 1.16; 95% CI, 1.13–1.19; P < 0.001).

Correlation analyses of hemodynamic (at baseline and after optimization) and sonographic parameters showed various aspects: analyses of CI and MAP levels, TTP and MCAv revealed highly significant inverse correlations of CI and TTP in the affected and unaffected basal ganglia with r = −0.798 ( p < 0.001) and r = −0.893 ( p < 0.0001), respectively.

Pairwise F ST values indicate that Ha1 has highly significant genetic differentiation relative to all other sites ( p = .001), and Ha2 has significant genetic differentiation from all sites ( p ≤ .009) except Ha10 ( p = .148), which is the closest geographically (Table 2 ).

Both Wilk’s Λ and Pillai’s trace were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for each of the single IVs (treatment, exposure time and cultivar), for the two-way interactions (treatment ∗ exposure time, treatment ∗ cultivar, exposure time ∗ cultivar) and the three-way interaction treatment ∗ exposure time ∗ cultivar.

The difference in the mean values of RyR1 immunoreactive particle size between early and late stages was statistically highly significant (0.263 ± 0.015 and 0.117 ± 0.006 μm 2 , respectively, p < 0.001).

The improvement in hearing results at second postoperative follow-up is highly significant in TORP-F ( P < .001).

On the individual level there was a highly significant correlation between the reduction of acute clinical pathology and the amelioration of life quality (rho = 0.61, p < 0.001; Fig 3 ).

While most of these relationships were non-significant ( S6 Fig ), there was a highly significant, positive relationship between parrotfish biomass and cover of live coral (r 2 = 0.25, p < 0.001; Fig 7 ).

These effects are usually highly significant (P < 0.001, see Figs 4 , 6 , 7 ).

There was a highly significant separation between the Bale monkeys and the combined vervet and grivet populations (Fig. 5a ; p < 0.001 ANOSIM), with the first NMDS dimension providing the main distinction.