Phenotypic diversity and GWA study The analysis of variance revealed a highly significant ( P < 0.001) variability due to the genotypes for all traits (Table 1 ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The differential results displayed ( Fig 8A ) that the expression profiles of 9 hub genes in both the VS group and the control group from the combined datasets demonstrated highly significant statistical variances ( p < 0.001).
Participation rose to 76.7% (95% CI: 70.4%–82.0%), a change that was highly significant ( p < 0.001, Cohen's h = 0.85).
Highly significant ( P < 0.001) positive correlations were seen between different developmental stages in the same location (Figure 1 ).
The adequacy of correlations between items was highly significant (Table 2 ; BTS: χ2 = 2875.494, df = 55, p < 0.001).
, 2010 ), representing a highly significant over-representation of cell cycle-regulated genes ( P -value <0.001) ( Supplementary Table S3 ).
The treatment factor showed a highly significant impact ( p < 0.001) on final body weight (BW 60 ), weight gain % (WG %), and specific growth rate (SGR), while also significantly affecting feed conversion ratio (FCR) ( p = 0.001).
We found 558 contigs with highly significant correlations (p < 0.001); 206 of these were positively correlated, while the remaining 352 were negatively correlated ( Supplementary Table S3 ).
We focused mainly on the highly significant results ( p ≤ 0.001) not allowing for the overinterpretation of weak signals or false positives.
This reduction was highly significant ( P < 0.001) in both the 60- and 120-min marks.
Hypothesis H2 proposed that "General self-efficacy has a significant positive impact on comprehensive literacy perceived improvement." Path analysis showed that the path coefficient from general self-efficacy to comprehensive literacy perceived improvement was 0.532, with a critical ratio of 7.456, highly significant at the p < 0.001 level.
In addition, highly significant correlations were observed between the ‘Ability to perform a TKA t1’ and ‘Use of drill/saw in OR’ (Pearson 0.72; p < 0.001), ‘Experience of VR/immersive games’ (Pearson 0.72; p < 0.001) and ‘Use of orthopaedic simulations’ (Pearson 0.74; p < 0.001).
A more detailed analysis of the Ki67, BrdU, and GFAP triple IF found an overall highly significant difference in the proportions of cell types between Tam-Idh1-KIs and controls (χ 2 5 = 43, p < 0.001).
Furthermore, a compelling linear relationship between the MDS and the risk of ED is evident, underscored by a highly significant p -value for the trend test ( p < 0.001).
Fertilization treatments were the most significant factor, demonstrating highly significant effects ( p ≤ 0.001) on 90% of the assessed parameters.
The interaction between sea level, host preference and time was highly significant for all specialist groups ( p < 0.001 ), indicating complex relationships in determining N e dynamics (Table S1 ). 3.2.
In the variance analysis applied to the whole data set ( Table 4 ), the effects due to the clones and the treatments as well as the clone x treatment interaction were highly significant (p<0.001).
TNF-α levels also showed a highly significant increase in the malaria group (12.5 ± 6.0 pg/mL) compared to the control group (4.0 ± 1.0 pg/mL) ( P < 0.001), with a mean difference of 8.5 pg/mL (95% CI: 7.1–9.9).
Results: All scores depicted highly significant statistical improvement over baseline scores ( P < 0.001).
In Ebnezar et al., Short Form 36 (SF-36) was used to assess QOL [ 17 ]; between and within group differences were highly significant on all domains of the SF-36 ( p < 0.001) with better improvement in the yoga group than the control group on 15th day and 90th day.
Moreover, glutaraldehyde‐impregnated polyurethane exhibited highly significant bactericidal activity ( P < 0.001), reducing bacterial numbers to below the detection limit (≥4 log).
In contrast, the observed reductions in mean dyspnea score of 24.41% and in mean fatigue score of 25.86% in the yoga group after the intervention were both highly significant ( P < 0.001).
All reported reductions were highly significant (p<0.001) due to the forced modeling.
Statistical analysis confirmed highly significant group differences at both locations ( p < 0.001).
RESULTS Based on immunohistochemistry, the results showed very highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) in the expression of SHH protein in the cancerous specimens compared with that of the noncancerous oral mucosa.