“highly significant”

There are highly significant differences between the two gender distributions according to the global academic results (p<0.001), but also significant differences (p<0.005) between the distributions of the two genders according to the academic results from the last attended examination session.

This difference is highly significant ( p < 0.001) and is a strong indication for a role of CRY in Rhodopsin-based light transduction that is independent of CRY’s own photoreceptive capabilities.

Firstly, the main interaction between value type and value level was highly significant, F (2,108) = 22.3, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.292.

This study revealed a highly significant correlation between vitamin D concentrations and AFC ( p < 0.001).

There was a highly significant difference in median percentage weight loss both amongst different geographical regions ( P <0.001) and countries ( P <0.001).

Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that polymicrobial blood culture remained statistically highly significant independent predictor of lethal outcome when compared to both Gram-positive (standard β value 3.950; OR 51.922, 95% CI 13.777–195.681; p ≤ 0.001) and Gram-negative (standard β value 3.117; OR 22.584, 95% CI 4.465–114.231; p ≤ 0.001) blood cultures.

There was a highly significant difference between the instruments overall, with WaveOne showing more remaining obturation material on the root canal surface ( P < 0.001).

There was a significant difference between fumaric acid and Maleic acid group ( P < 0.05) whereas, a highly significant difference was noticed between fumaric acid and EDTA group ( P < 0.001).

Moreover, among the study cohort, all of the patients who died had received prolonged initial empirical antibiotic treatment compared to 73.2% of the patients who were discharged, a difference that was statistically highly significant ( P <.001).

RESULTS Acne patients compared to controls showed no significant difference in the frequencies of IL-4 (-590 T/C) polymorphic genotypes ( P =.8), yet had a highly significant difference in IL-4R (Q551R A/G) genotypes ( P <.001).

Highly significant genotypic effects ( P < 0.001) were detected for TGW and GW in both populations, with the enhancing alleles all derived from MY46 (Table 2 ).

It was found that EA significantly differ from the other groups: highly significant ( P < 0.001) when compared with EEAA with a mean difference of 1.374 and significantly different ( P < 0.05) when compared with EAA and EEA with mean differences of 0.785 and 0.853, respectively.

Here, we demonstrate significant differences with highly significant P values ( P <.001) using the Kruskal-Wallis test for survey sum scores (weighted and nonweighted) and chi-square test for categorical choice for a favorite system.

Semen Parameters PHF treated group showed a highly significant ( P ≤ 0.001) enhancement in sperm concentration after 90 days (3 months) of treatment as compared to the baseline value on Day 0 of the current trial ( Figure 1(a) ).

The final multivariate logistic regression model ( table 3 ), including a random effect to account for dependence among samples collected in the same study region, found a highly significant ( p < 0.001) association between prevalence and housing unit density, with 26% ( p < 0.001) increase in infection odds associated with a doubling of housing unit density.

However, for both control and experimental nests, there was a highly significant effect of time (GLMM: time effect: F 1.250 = 119.02; p < 0.001) on the excavated area.

The difference was highly significant ( p <0.001).

The differences in cortisol suppression between fosdagrocorat doses and both placebo and prednisone 5 mg were highly significant at both weeks 1 and 2 (all P < 0.001).

In the complete feedback condition ( M = 854.12 milliseconds, SEM = 42.55), participants looked at the non‐chosen lottery twice as long as in the partial feedback condition ( M = 402.22 milliseconds, SEM = 47.11), and this difference was highly significant ( t (19) = 8.84, p < .001, d = 1.49).

The examination of simple effects between treatments within sampling zones indicated a highly significant difference in Lygus density between the main treatment alfalfa (trap crop) row and the control strawberry row ( F = 46.48; df = 1, 79.36; P < 0.001).

There was a highly significant difference between layers II/III and V ( z = −3.77, P < 0.001) and layers II/III and VI ( z = −3.12, P < 0.001).

Table 2 includes the perceptions of the nursing on managerial items, including three regarding the “Frequency of events reported.” The overall perceptions were highly significant after accreditation in comparison with the international benchmarks for all items ( P <.001).

The significance levels from three-way ANOVA of algal species, treatment and season across the study were highly significant ( P < 0.001) for all interactions as well as all main effects (Table 2 ) showing that the effect of treatment varied significantly between the algal species and that this was further modified by the time of year the seaweeds were collected.

The total indirect effects were highly significant for both working memory (B = 0.14, p < 0.001) and attention (B = 0.12, p = 0.003).

* indicates significant differences (p < 0.05), ** indicates very significant differences (p < 0.01) and *** indicates highly significant differences (p < 0.001).