From week 8 onward, the differences resulting between this treatment (T2) and the exotic based treatments (T1 and T3) were highly significant (all weeks, ANCOVA, p values < 0.001) ( Fig. 3 ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The Student's t-test for independent samples revealed a highly significant difference between the logarithmic cfDNA values of both collectives (t(132.0) = 5.94; 95% CI, 4.9–16.0; p<0.001; Fig. 7 ), with mean cfDNA concentrations of the CHD patients being 2-fold higher compared to the controls.
Further analysis of the year-to-year CT variation in Kentville revealed that year had a marginal effect on extractable CT levels ( p = 0.057), while genotype remained a highly significant factor ( p < 0.001), and no significant year × genotype interaction was observed ( p = 0.910) ( Table 1 ).
In spite of this significant caveat, the difference in rejection times between the two groups was highly significant ( P <0.001) and therefore unlikely to be the result of differences in HLA matching alone.
The odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for mild cognitive impairment was 0.43 (0.39, 0.48) for a successful feet-together test, 0.53 (0.46, 0.60) for a successful semi-tandem test, and 0.63 (0.57, 0.70) for a successful tandem test after adjusting for potential confounders [the p-value for each model was highly significant (all p < 0.001)].
The difference is highly significant (one-way ANOVA p<0.001), but the difference is small with disease genes having approximately 5% lower intron divergence than non-disease genes ( Figure 2a ).
Six pairwise combinations show highly significant location shifts (p<0.001).
Results Manipulation Check When comparing the percentage of REM sleep across the two nights for each experimental group we found a highly significant decrease of REM sleep from 11.9%±1.2 (mean ±SEM; adaptation night) to 1.4%±.4 (experimental night) in the REM deprivation group (p<.001; paired t-test) and a slight increase in the undisturbed sleep group (12.4%±1.2 and 15.7%±1.4; p = .07).
In summary, there was a highly significant (p < 0.001) concordant expression of CD protein markers and transcript expressions.
10 24 Despite their conventional format, these interventions resulted in highly significant improvements in participants' knowledge of thalassaemia and its prevention ( P < 0.001), demonstrating the continued effectiveness of traditional educational methods.
The association between knowledge level and vaccine uptake was highly significant (χ 2 = 37.5, df = 1, p < .001), indicating that parents with greater HPV vaccine knowledge were significantly more likely to have vaccinated their children.
The highly significant difference occurs in the surface soil (p<0.001), with the range of changes under drip irrigation being smaller than that under flood irrigation.
The chi-square test for GOS yielded a highly significant result (χ2 = 910.85, p < 0.001), indicating that patients with lower GCS scores were substantially more likely to experience poorer outcomes or death (Figure 2 ).
The significant moderating effect of urban–rural residence on the BMI-chronic disease link remained after controlling for cognitive function (β for interaction term = −0.090, p = 0.002), and the U-shaped BMI-depression relationship remained highly significant after adjusting for functional disability status (β for BMI_z 2 = 0.171, p < 0.001).
The differences in periventricular patterns and Dawson's finger detection between NMOsd and MS were highly significant ( P < 0.001).
The difference in the types of SLT used was statistically highly significant between males and females (X2 = 338.3; p < 0.001; Table 2 ). 3.3 Comparison of clinical parameters across the study groups There was a highly significant difference in probing pocket depth (PPD; t = 9.69; p < 0.001), gingival recession (GR; t = 16.16; p < 0.001), and clinical attachment loss (CAL; t = 13.73; p < 0.001) between the SLT users and NTB users ( Table 3 ). 3.4 Effect of tobacco placement on periodontal health The placement of tobacco at various sites within the oral cavity considerably influenced periodontal status ( p < 0.001 for all measurements; Table 4 ).
The Gender parameter in the SDV model was found to be non-significant, despite being highly significant (p≤.001) in the three other models.
The analysis revealed a positive and highly significant association between cumulative dose and sIgG4 levels ( P < .001), indicating that higher IgG4 levels are linked to greater tolerance of egg protein.
This variation was highly significant, with the significance level being P < 0.001.
The quadratic models explaining the relationship between temperature and cumulative germination were highly significant ( P < 0.001) and displayed very high R 2 -values (mean = 0.82 ± 0.08; ESM, Table A1) for each population.
Furthermore, the individual change in TL was inversely correlated with initial TL at a highly significant level after controlling for age and sex (r = −0.962, p<0.001; Figure 2 ), indicating that the lengthening rate was most pronounced in individuals with shorter telomeres at baseline.
These differences were highly significant (p < 0.001) ( Table 5 ).
The overall analysis revealed statistically significant improvement in mean neonatal birth weight in the dydrogesterone group (2.10±0.19 kg, range 1.7-2.5 kg) compared to conventional treatment (1.60±0.22 kg, range 1.2-2.0 kg) with a highly significant statistical difference (t=8.162, p<0.001).
This analysis revealed a highly significant effect of ranking ( F [9,882] =; 83.33, p < .001, η 2 partial =; .46) indicating that the 10 most common associations differ significantly in their associative strength ranging from 69.5%; down to 21.7%; (see Figure 2 ).
There was a highly significant effect of season on the mean wing lengths of standard-jar reared females ( F = 213.345, df = 2, 678, P <0.001) with significantly decreasing mean wing lengths from the wet/cool to the dry/hot season (Tukey; P≤0.001; Fig.