“highly significant”

Results for the model with 12 components are displayed, but even the simplest Partial Least Squares model with a single component yielded highly significant results ( r =0.83; P <.001; mean absolute error=1.62).

field temperature were highly significant (P<0.001) and with average R 2 above 0.95) and actual warming was within ±5% of the prescribed value [35] .

Table 2 , Table 3 , Table 4 show that the model was highly significant (P < 0.001) and all misfit terms were greater than 0.05, indicating that the model is effective for data analysis and can better simulate the effects of three independent variables: pH, time, and concentration on the removal rate of Cd [ 29 ].

An evaluation was done for PB Treg cells by pooling newly diagnosed, relapsed and patients in remission together as a MM cohort; this pooled cohort did not show statistical significance against MGUS and SMM, while it was highly significant against HVs (P<0.001).

Post hoc pairwise comparisons revealed that the rating differences between the two listener groups were highly significant for AS_early, β = −3.07, SE = 0.79, z = −3.87, p < 0.001, AS_late, β = −3.81, SE = 0.68, z = −5.6, p < 0.001, FS, β = −3.45, SE = 0.69, z = −5.07, p < 0.001, and WP, β = −3.21, SE = 0.76, z = −4.22, p < 0.001, again confirming that BIL raters were less likely than ML raters to judge the bilinguals’ L1 speech as non-native.

Analysis based on the intervention program revealed that for the resistance + aerobic exercise group, the results of the meta-analysis were highly significant (MD = 3.98; 95% CI: 1.89 to 6.06; I 2 = 98.0%; P < 0.001).

In ultrasonographic measurements, the thickness of the VM and VMO muscles and the VMO fiber angle was evaluated. Results Both groups showed statistically highly significant improvement in all evaluation parameters in inter- and intragroup comparisons (p<0.001).

Therefore support groups are a form of respite for family caregivers and have been proven in meta-analytical studies [ 5 , 8 ] and reviews [ 4 , 9 ] to have a highly significant effect (p < 0.001) on abilities and knowledge of the family caregiver and significant (p < 0.01) effects on subjective well-being and caregiver burden.

The correlation matrix is shown in Table 3 and shows a highly significant relationship (r = 0.3 - 0.8, p < 0.001) between marks for each Theme across the two years.

42 – 50 In a head-to-head randomized clinical trial in patients with relatively low baseline glycemic values (mean HbA 1C 7.3%, fasting plasma glucose [FPG] 9.2 mmol/L [165 mg/dL]), patients inadequately controlled on metformin who were randomized to vildagliptin 50 mg bid were weight stable at 52 weeks (−0.2 kg), which was highly significant compared with the weight gain seen in the comparator group receiving glimepiride ≤6 mg daily (between-group difference −1.8 kg, P < 0.001). 41 This difference presumably stems in part from the glucose-dependent “fail-safe” system that prevents even elevated incretin levels from overstimulating insulin secretion in the absence of elevated or rising glucose levels.

The analysis of variance indicated that there are highly significant statistical differences ( p < 0.001) in the year-by-year width of the tree rings of the studied tree species.

The mean values of total cholesterol, triglycerides and LDL-C were higher in post-menopausal women than in peri-menopausal women and this difference was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001); similar results have been reported by other authors, including de Aloysio et al. in Italy [ 5 ], Stevenson et al., in England [ 22 ], and Gomina et al. in Benin [ 23 ].

The treatment with RST showed highly significant decrease in BUN ( P < 0.001), urea ( P < 0.001), creatinine ( P < 0.01) and significant increase in albumin ( P < 0.001) as compared to CIS-treated group.

Differences from absolute values (not adjusted for baseline score) were highly significant (P<0.001) in all eight domains in favour of satisfied patients.

A value of p < .05 was considered statistically significant, p < .01 was considered highly significant and p < .001 was considered extremely statistically significant. 3.

5 , A – C ), all selected ratios uniformly showed highly significant differences in the temporal region ( p < 0.001) (exception for 580/500 ratio: p < 0.005) but not in the frontal and occipital regions ( Fig. 6 , D – G ).

The analyses of both MoCA and QoL-AD scores yielded a highly significant interaction [MoCA: F (1,58) = 57.18, p <0.001, η p 2 = 0.50; QoL-AD: F (1,58) = 17.17, p <0.001, η p 2 = 0.23].

24 , 52 , 56 Results Genetic Connections Compared to Historical Documents The overall correlation between embarkation counts from Africa and mean proportion of identity by descent shared 42 ( ms IBD) between regions of Atlantic Africa and all of the Americas ( Figure 2 A) is highly significant (Spearman’s coefficient permutation; p < 0.001).

Regarding patients’ health behaviours, there were highly significant correlations between early and late presentation (p < 0.001).

The results of the multiple logistic regression analyses indicated a highly significant correlation between extinction and O 2 -carrying capacity ( p < 0.001; Figure 3 A; Tables S3–S9 ).

When two extreme outlier values were excluded from the analysis, the interaction was highly significant [F(1.1, 6.8) = 25.3, p = 0.001].

The serial changes in VAS pain score in the gabapentin group show that there is a highly significant difference between V2 and V3 ( P < 0.001).

Due to a very large size of the cohort most P -values are significant ( P < 0.05) and many are highly significant ( P < 0.001).

The temperature × mint interaction was highly significant for respiratory rate (P < 0.001).

This approach facilitated identifying and ranking significant and highly significant differences among the tested means at the level of P = 0.001.