“highly significant”

While the mean expression scores remained low in the 1 to 15 min groups, a marked increase was documented in the 30 min group, with highly significant intergroup differences ( p < 0.001).

Mean maxillary arch length, arch circumference and inter-canine and inter-molar width in males as well as females was reduced as compared to the control group and this difference was statistically highly significant ( P <0.001) [ Table 4 ].

Comparison of fiducials on the anterior–posterior image The ANOVA on the shifts for the AP image showed there were highly significant differences between fiducials, both in the LR and SI directions ( P < 0.001, n = 9250) (Fig. 1 ).

However, the consistency and strong statistical evidence of the results suggest it is unlikely that more patients would lead to a change in outcome, particularly in relation to T2 SPACE vs convention planning CT, where a highly significant difference was observed between mean DSC ( P < 0.001).

The RRSO and the three MSs were highly significant ( p < 0.001) based on the likelihood ratio test when comparing a model with RRSO versus no RRSO (the 3 MSs included) and a model with the three MSs versus no MS (RRSO included), respectively.

According to the regression analysis there was a highly significant linear increase in StRIK levels after wounding ( p < 0.001) (Fig.

AMMI Analysis of G × E Interaction The AMMI model analysis of variance (ANOVA) of eleven cassava genotypes measured in four environments showed that the mean square (MS) for genotype, environment and GEI were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for fresh root yield and dry matter content ( Table 1 ).

The correlation between heading and anthesis was moderate and highly significant ( r =0.51, p <0.001).

In both depots the presence of rhythm was highly significant ( P <0.001) ( Table 1 ).

The differences in frequency of pathogen type between non-food animal and food animal associated EIZDs is statistically highly significant (Chi square: 18.2, p < 0.001).

The main effect found by the frequentist statistical analysis was a highly significant difference between ADduction and ABduction gains [ F (1,38) = 350, p < 0.001]; the ADduction gains exceeded the ABduction gains (see Table 2 and Figure 5 ).

A three factor ANOVA testing for the effects of zeitgeber period, day length and genotype on the phase of E activity (done for T22 to T28) revealed highly significant effects of all factors on the timing of E activity, zeitgeber period: F (3,663) = 496.96; p < .001; day length: F (2,663) = 2943.38; p < .001; genotype: F (1,663) = 2716.92; p < .001.

This habitat-driven structure was verified with a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) test on the NMDS1 & NMDS2 coordinates, with habitat being a highly significant variable ( p < 0.001) in explaining the variance in the combined NMDS coordinate distributions and each coordinate separately.

A P -value > 0.05 was considered not significant, P < 0.05 was deemed significant, P < 0.01 was considered highly significant, and P < 0.001 was considered extremely significant.

Overall batch effects were highly significant (p<0.001) for most traits, and were generally more significant than the gender or genetic type effects.

The hematologic recovery (following the withdrawal of rEPO) with and without immunosuppressive therapy was highly significant (57% vs. 2%, respectively, P < 0.001); and nearly 95% had complete recovery following renal transplantation ( n = 19 cases).

The relationship between urban soil OC density (beneath both impervious surfaces and greenspace) and depth was described by a highly significant negative exponential function ( R 2 = 57%, F (1, 184) = 243.8, p <0.001, y = 51.910(±2.492 S.E.)e −0.0232 (± 0.002 S.E.)× ) ( Fig. 1 ).

The wealth index remained a strong predictor: compared to the poorest quintile, children in the richer quintiles had 56% lower odds of stunting in column 5 (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.33–0.56), attenuating to 46% (95% CI = 0.39–0.73) in the fully adjusted model, though both effects remained highly significant, p < 0.001.

To validate this further, we transfected cells with ASO-MALAT1 and miR-30b mimic and observed a highly significant reduction in TLR8 ( P<0.001 ).

The body surface area increased continuously and significantly from the 1st to 5th instar: there was a highly significant difference between the 1st and 2nd instars (one-way ANOVA with post hoc LSD test, p < 0.001), and extremely significant differences were observed in subsequent instar transitions (one-way ANOVA with post hoc LSD test, p < 0.001), reflecting the continuous expansion of body surface area ( Figure 2 C).

The χ 2 test of independence was highly significant, χ 2 (1, 77) = 15.130, p < 0.001.

The difference between pre and post-test was highly significant at t (7) = -5. 68, p <.001.

Both difference were found to be highly significant by applying a generalized linear model in R (p < 0.001) 64 .

One-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of time ( p < 0.001, F = 37.7; n = 17–19 images per group).

In the depression model for females, age and income were found to be highly significant (p < 0.001).