“highly significant”

In contrast, the experimental group demonstrated a highly significant improvement in sputum viscosity after the intervention ( p < 0.001), with a marked increase in the number of patients reporting no sputum or grade I sputum, and a complete absence of grade III sputum.

All participants with PPCM demonstrated reduced LVEF (<45%) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (9 (100.0%)), whereas none of the non-PPCM group showed these findings (0 (0.0%)), with a highly significant association (χ2 = 99.99, p < 0.001).

Both groups demonstrated comparable and highly significant improvement in psychological nursing self-efficacy (PNS; education: t(76) = − 3.34, p = .001; scenario: t(107) = − 3.31, p = .001), with no between-group difference at post-test (t(183) = − 0.98, p = .331).

Population structure Overall F ST value was highly significant ( F ST = 0.04; 95% Confidence Interval C.I . = 0.017 0.039; P <0.001) and pair-wise F ST revealed significant values for 107 out of 120 comparisons, after Bonferroni correction ( Table 4 ).

This differed highly significant from the respective SPOC d both in adolescents (paired t-test: p < 0.001, d = 1.877) and parents ( p < 0.001, d = 2.211).

One-way ANOVA revealed highly significant treatment effects on all measured parameters ( p < 0.001).

Periosteal reaction was noted in 83% of patients with pain compared with only 21% of those without pain, showing a highly significant association ( p < 0.001).

Of these, age group, education level, and marital status were highly significant ( p < 0.001), The risk of disability increased consistently with increase in age of older people.

Statistically significant changes were classified as significant (*) where p < 0.05, more significant (**) where p < 0.01 and highly significant (***) where p < 0.001 as compared with control group.

Similarly, mean mortality was substantially greater during summer (1272 ± 44) compared to winter (229 ± 27), with this difference also highly significant (Welch’s t -test, t = 13.17, p < 0.001).

An analysis of correlation between genotype-determined activity score and log metabolic ratio of urinary dextromethorphan to dextrorphan proved to be highly significant (Spearman correlation coefficient = −0.683; P < .001) (eAppendix and eFigure 4 in the Supplement ).

Model fitting comparison The fitting results of both MLR and RF showed that all variables appeared as highly significant ( p < 0.001) in the intermediate models.

Using an independent samples t -test, mean differences between groups were highly significant for all vascular disease risk variables ( p- values<0.001).

The degree of basal cell degeneration observed in OLP cases and the density of chronic inflammatory cell infiltration was compared with the concentration of CD1a-positive LCs in OLP using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and found to be highly significant at P =0.001 and 0.002, respectively [ Figure 6 ].

A history of urinary tract diseases (UTD) was another major risk factor, with 33% of RCC patients having a history of UTD, compared to only 4.5% of controls, demonstrating a highly significant association with RCC risk (p < 0.001).

Using data for 159 districts, we found that the association between dry season and wet season incidence was also highly significant (p < 0.001) overall ( Figure 7 , panel B) and stratified by province or year (not shown), although the proportion of the total variation in epidemic magnitude accounted for by dry season incidence was lower (45%).

Improvement over all groups from baseline to 3 months was highly significant on all three dependent variables: PDA, F 1,149 =160.93, P <.001, with the mean PDA increasing from 44% to 72%; DDD, F 1,149 =61.73, P <.001, with the mean decreasing from 8.0 to 4.6; and InDUC, F 1,149 =122.28, P <.001, with the overall mean decreasing from 40.8 to 19.5.

We observed highly significant differences in leaf litter C content among plant species (F 5,12 = 23.89, p < 0.001), which mirrored the gradient in C content of green leaves (Table S1 ).

Comparing the mean change in DLQI from the first to the last visit, we observed a highly significant ( P <0.001) decline in DLQI in both sides.

The between‐group difference after intervention was highly significant after adjustment for baseline values, changes in energy, and protein intake ( p < 0.001) (Table 4 ). 3.5.

However, there were highly significant correlations of L5 activity with RRI (ρ = −0.53, P = 0.001) and LF/HF (ρ = 0.44, P = 0.007) during L5 in the total participants indicating that dominance of the sympathetic system relative to the parasympathetic system is associated with higher activity during sleep.

The overall F ST across all loci was 0.064 and was highly significant ( P < 0.001).

This approach yielded highly significant common scale parameters ( p < 0.001), as indicated by the lower AIC value, effectively capturing the variability in nymph development with respect to temperature.

However, when the RRM was used, the genetic sire variance component was highly significant ( P -values <0.001) in the FZTDU and DU6 lines, but not in the two high-fecundity lines.

Intriguingly, in EBV-positive patients, the difference in DFS between SPC-prognosis groups was highly significant [HR: 2.608 (0.735–9.254) in intermediate-risk, 17.656 (3.839–81.200) in high-risk group, log-rank p <0.001], necessitating further investigation.