“highly significant”

There was a highly significant difference (log-rank P = .001) ( Figure 3 , B ) between patients with smaller PA diameters (≤37 mm; survival probability, 98.0%; 95% CI, 95.3%-100.0%) compared with the patient group with larger diameters (≥38 mm; survival probability, 83.3%, 95% CI, 72.7%-93.9%).

We regarded p < 0.05 as significant, p < 0.01 as highly significant, and p < 0.001 as extremely highly significant.

However, VAS in each group was reduced with highly significant during the studied period when compared with basal values (SNCN Group = 6 (3–7) and DNCN Group = 6 (3–7), p ≤ 0.001).

Heart rate values were statistically highly significant lower in the labetalol group than magnesium sulfate group starting from intubation until 110 min after anesthesia induction ( p < 0.001), and both groups were comparable at baseline values ( p > 0.05) (Fig. 2 B).

This shift in decreased or increased PCaa species was highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001), as shown in Figure 1 C.

The convergent validity was very small, but there were highly significant positive correlations between the willingness and readiness to quit with integrated and intrinsic subscales (rs = 0.25–0.37, p < 0.001).

All five specific indirect effects of TO2 (and thus also SARS-CoV-2 infection) on HR-QoL were significant yielding highly significant total indirect (t = −5.03, p < 0.001) and total (t = −13.30, p < 0.001) effects.

13.8 ± 11.4 min; p 0.48) showed non-significant trends of time-saving for the very HPSD group with the expected highly significant reduction in ablation time (10.6 ± 4.5 min vs. 23.3 ± 9.6 min; p < 0.001).

eGFR and mean blood pressure were highly significant at the level of P < .001.

In the new analysis of the association between aperiodic-adjusted α power and performance in the Flanker task, the Flanker score showed a standardized β of 0.073, which was highly significant ( p = 0.001) while controlling for the effect of age.

There were highly significant post-program improvements in knowledge as measured by the 25-item Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale, with an average 30% improvement (p < 0.001, effect size > 1.2).

Correlation between two the CPE versions (ΣCPE 2008 and ΣCPE 2010 ) was highly significant ( r = 0.644, p < 0.001).

Results Analysis of variance and correlation among physiological traits Highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) in SES scores, shoot and root dry weights, shoot and root lengths, shoot and root K + and Na + concentrations, and shoot and root Na + :K + ratios were observed among families and parental lines.

There were no significant differences to dimenhydrinate 40 mg (LSM [95% CI] − 0.96 [− 1.07; − 0.84]) and betahistine dihydrochloride 16 mg (LSM [95% CI] − 0.88 [− 0.95; − 0.80]), but highly significant differences to all other comparators ( p < 0.001).

As a result of these opposite changes during Omissions, the ANOVA revealed a significant repetition effect (F(1,18)= 13.3, p = 0.002, η 2 = 0.215) and the interaction between group and repetition was highly significant (F(1,18)= 15.2, p = 0.001, η 2 = 0.247).

Comparing PRHL and non-PRHL patients according to the response at 2 courses, a highly significant difference was observed (p=0.001).

The main effect of Conflict was highly significant [ F (1,64) = 74.10; p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.54]: response time was longer in incongruent trials ( Figure 3A ).

The association of WGS and VOC-NGS was shown to be highly significant by Spearman correlation P < 0.001, which was applied to the 38 samples evaluated by both assays where 36 of 38 (94.7%) perfect agreements (Kappa = 0.916) occurred.

Although there was a certain overlap in the outliers, the difference between normal and abnormal GMs was highly significant (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.001).

Organic Amendment Properties There were highly significant ( P < 0.001) differences among the soil properties of the organic amendments.

MF assisted NRs + DOX produced highly significant S phase arrest ( p < 0.001) with decreased cellular population in G1 and G2 phases ( p < 0.05).

CRP was superior to the other biomarkers as analysed with ROC curves with an AUC of 0.844, followed by PCT (0.825), hepcidin (0.780), and HBP (0.742), although all curves were highly significant ( p < 0.001), whereas lactate (0.588) and WBC (0.541) were not useful in predicting septic shock (Fig. 3 , Table 4 ).

ATE for Flanker and posterior surface area was highly significant with a p ‐value <0.001 and a causal estimate of 0.008 (95% CI [0.003–0.012]).

These viral negative lung tissues when compared to the viral positive lung samples showed a highly significant increase in CD3+ and CD8 T cells (p < 0.001), equivalent numbers of CD163+ cells, and significantly less PDL1, CD11b and CD206+ cells (p = 0.002).

Effect of Long-Term Increased S100B Levels on Hippocampal Progenitor Cell Proliferation and Migration The comparison of the proliferative marker BrdU and Ki67 for quantification of progenitor cell proliferation revealed that both markers provided highly significant congruent results ( Figure 1 A; BrdU mean 2.33 ± 2.99 immunoreactive cells; F 5,210 = 33.91, p < 0.001; Ki67 mean 1.53 ± 2.90 immunoreactive cells; F 5,206 = 73.49, p < 0.001; r = 0.608, p < 0.001).