“highly significant”

All estimated slopes were highly significant ( p < 0.001), indicating that higher LW values were generally associated with higher estimated nutrient intake.

One-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of vibration class, with F(4, 3974) = 22,486.6, p < 0.001.

The effect of the year was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with total dry matter yield in 2024 being approximately 76% lower than in 2023.

The median SWE values were significantly greater in BI-RADS 4B lesions (45 kPa; IQR: 39–50) than in BI-RADS 4A lesions (38 kPa; IQR: 29.5–39.5), with a highly significant difference (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test).

At 3 d, concentration effects were highly significant for primary root length (F = 13,293.67, p < 0.001), total root length (F = 3226.84, p < 0.001), root vigor (F = 2163.60, p < 0.001), MDA (F = 672.86, p < 0.001), and ethylene (F = 691.43, p < 0.001).

We have made analysis with the images available in public domain, and the images are captured with different machines and possibly from different demographics; however, statistical inference is highly significant ( P < 0.001), the calculated P value in turn shows high level of accuracy and sensitivity compared to existing AI-based methods.

Pairwise testing demonstrates that the difference between 1 and 6 h is not significant at 10 and 25 mGy ( p > 0.05), is just significant at 50 mGy ( p = 0.023) and is highly significant at 100 mGy ( p < 0.001; figure 3 a ).

Her2 and pHer2 expression levels showed a highly significant correlation as well (Spearman-rho = 0.531; p ≤ 0.001).

A highly significant difference in the DMFT scores was found between the institutionalized children and those residing with their parents (p < 0.001).

Canopy Mortality Flood duration was highly significant ( p < 0.001) to canopy mortality ( Figure 7 ).

ANOVA showed a highly significant year effect on yield ( p < 0.001), whereas MG and Year × MG were not significant.

This difference was highly significant (p < 0.001) in both instances (for males vs females, χ 2 = 53.3, Odds Ratio 3.1, 95% Confidence Interval 2.26 to 4.25; for non-White vs White, excluding the unknown group, χ 2 = 322.4, Odds Ratio 3.61, 95% Confidence Interval 3.13 to 4.16).

The effect of year fitted with the spline was highly significant for two species ( P. austriacus : df = 2.92, p < 0.001 and T. teniotis : df = 3.87, p = 0.026), suggesting a different inter-annual pattern among these species ( Figure 3 , Table 6 ). 4.

Spatio-temporal analysis identified a single highly significant cluster in the central-eastern area, accounting for approximately 27% of outbreaks (RR = 58.06; p < 0.001).

Cows classified as uterine-infection-negative (UI−; n = 122) showed a strongly right-skewed distribution toward score 0 (clear or translucent mucus), whereas UI-positive cows ( n = 58) were concentrated at scores 2 and 3 (≥50% purulent material), with a highly significant between-group difference (Kruskal–Wallis, p < 0.001).

Inter-prefecture differences were highly significant ( p < 0.001), identifying geography as a major risk factor.

Results CT-Based Changes in Tumor Size after Two Cycles of Chemotherapy Across the study cohort, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed a highly significant decrease in tumor diameter on CT (p<0.001) after two cycles of chemotherapy (mean size before therapy = 3.7 cm; range = 1.4–9.3 cm; mean size after two courses of chemotherapy = 2.8 cm; range = 0.7–7.3 cm).

Intraocular Pressure Dynamics Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect of time on IOP [F(1.8, 70.2) = 312.5, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.89].

Detritus production Daily detritus production (mean±SD throughout) in pots containing sponges (all species combined; 12.3±10.5 mg DW) was considerably higher than controls without sponge (2.0±0.7 mg DW) and the difference was highly significant (linear mixed model, p<0.001, Fig. 5A ).

Offspring Weight Variables We observed highly significant differences in dam lactation number for birth weight ( p < 0.001), weight gain at weaning ( p < 0.01), weaning weight ( p < 0.001), and height at weaning ( p < 0.01; Table 4 ).

The highly significant effect of day on community structure (PERMANOVA, p = 0.001) and the contraction of microbial clusters by day 90, as visualized in the PCoA plot ( Figure 1 b), reflected a reduction in inter-individual variance in the control group.

Respondents reporting xerostomia had substantially higher OHIP-G14 total scores (mean 26.7) than those without xerostomia (mean 17.3), and this difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The effect of sex was highly significant, with reduced CO in female offspring compared to males ( P < 0.001).

Statistical correlation analyses were performed on more than 20 points collected on calcifications and indicate highly significant positive correlation for Ca and P (Pearson r: 0.9965; p ≤ 0.001), for Ca and Mg (Pearson r: 0.9646; p ≤ 0.002), and significant negative correlation for Ca and S (Pearson r: −0.8515; p ≤ 0.05).

In contrast, Tg4510 mice treated with ACI‐16664 showed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) 51% reduction in aggregated hTau levels compared to vehicle‐treated controls.