“highly significant”

Furthermore, waterlogging duration had a highly significant ( P < 0.001) effect on root dry mass for all three genotypes ( Table 3 ).

Varietal differences were highly significant ( P < 0.001) for the majority of all parameters.

The 3 × 3 ANOVA revealed a highly significant main effect for buildings, F (2, 99) = 19.175, p < 0.001, showing that there were overall differences in absolute elevator use between the different intervention buildings.

Statistically highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) were observed within the categories of HCPs comparing perception about COVID-19 between doctors versus MLSS, and nurses versus MLSS, not between doctors versus nurses.

The dosimetric gains associated with spacer implantation were highly significant (p<0.001) for most variables.

This shift in the steatosis grade is highly significant in our population ( p <0·001) ( Fig. 1 C). 3.2.

For the soil depth treatment, we observed a highly significant main effect of soil depth, with deep soils having much higher NPP than shallow soils ( F 1,40 = 52.01, p < .001).

No significant difference was identified between first and second 40 km endurance exercise ( p = 0.984), however, comparing both first and second 40 km endurance horses to trotter horses separately confirmed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).

Among the three highly significant outcomes ( p < .001), the average student response score was 3.41 while the average faculty response score was 4.19, a difference of 0.78 on the five-point Likert scale.

Of these, six cancer types showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) upregulation of the AE2 mRNA (Fig.

Of note, differences between isolated IUGR and e-PE were highly significant at 22–25 weeks of gestation ( p < 0.001).

These effects were highly significant [repeated measures ANOVA with call type as a within-subjects variable; for drug effect F (1,89) = 116.57, p < 0.001; for call type F (4,189) = 0.65, p = 0.63; for drug × call interaction, F (4,189) = 0.26, p = 0.90].

However, the highly significant results ( p < 0.001) in the abstracts were strongly correlated (r = 0.61, p < 10 −6 ) with the number of p < 0.001 significances in the papers.

The data were highly significant: the β index was equal to 0.35, t = 3.74, and p < 0.001.

All these levels of variation were highly significant ( P < 0.001).

Bartlett’s test was highly significant [χ 2 ( 45 ) = 226.08, p < 0.001], suggesting that variable correlations did not form an identity matrix.

A one-way MANOVA on all the social capital and health-related variables with study group (MCL, comparison) as independent variables proved to be highly significant (F [6, 1060] = 40.28, Wilk’s Lambda = 0.81, p < 0.001).

The highly significant dose-response association ( p < 0.001) and the high PAR documented in this study confirm the large consequences of musculoskeletal pain among eldercare workers.

This epitope was almost exclusively located within neurons and an intensity correlation for co-localization confirmed this observation, demonstrating a highly significant percentage of neurons co-labeled with NeuN compared to both Iba1 ( p < 0.001) and GFAP ( p < 0.001) immunostained cells ( Figure 10 D). 4.

The viscosity variations were highly significant over the hemicycles (F 2.7,53.2 = 16.431, p < 0.001, η 2 p = 0.45), but no effects were detected for the interaction between hemicycle and group (F 2.7,53.2 = 0.794, p = 0.489, η 2 p = 0.04).

2c , we observed a highly significant difference in predicted neuropathology scores between AD cases and controls (two-sided t test: t = 22.98, p < 0.001), and these differences were more pronounced for MD-AD compared with the other baseline models (results split by dataset are shown in Supplementary Figure 4a ).

A three factor ANOVA testing for the effects of zeitgeber period, day length and genotype on the phase of E activity (done for T22 to T28) revealed highly significant effects of all factors on the timing of E activity, zeitgeber period: F (3,663) = 496.96; p < .001; day length: F (2,663) = 2943.38; p < .001; genotype: F (1,663) = 2716.92; p < .001.

This habitat-driven structure was verified with a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) test on the NMDS1 & NMDS2 coordinates, with habitat being a highly significant variable ( p < 0.001) in explaining the variance in the combined NMDS coordinate distributions and each coordinate separately.

The hematologic recovery (following the withdrawal of rEPO) with and without immunosuppressive therapy was highly significant (57% vs. 2%, respectively, P < 0.001); and nearly 95% had complete recovery following renal transplantation ( n = 19 cases).

Both difference were found to be highly significant by applying a generalized linear model in R (p < 0.001) 64 .