Barely Significant
← all phrases

“highly significant”

132,143 sentences · 132,143 papers · 160,126 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p=0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013)

In the literature

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Group differences The MANCOVA on group differences in task response was highly significant for group [ F = 5.183, p < 0.001; pη 2 = 0.190] and also sex and age [ F = 4.199 & 2.299, p < 0.001 & = 0.023; pη 2 = 0.160 & 0.094 respectively].
highly significantp-value < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The second in the psychological domain (Are you capable of accepting your physical appearance?) showed that Hb SS patients said they were more willing to accept their physical appearance than the Hb SC group (p-value > 0.05). The applicability of the WHOQOL-BREF to measure quality of life in sickle cell disease The correlation between the WHOQOL-BREF questions and the mean score of each of its domains varied from 0.492 to 0.759, thus presenting a highly significant correlation between the scores of each of the six domains (p-value < 0.001) The internal consistency of the WHOQOL-BREF as measured by Cronbach's alpha coefficient was satisfactory on considering all items of the score (0.88), as well as separately, by 'physical' (0.78), 'psychological' (0.64), 'social relations' (0.54), and 'environmental domains' (0.71), and 'general QOL' (0.51) ( Table 3 ).
highly significantp <0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Fortunately, adopting a co-delivering strategy for DOX⋅HCl and CQ, DC-DIV/C exhibited much stronger anti-tumor efficacy with the TIR of 84.52 %, displaying significant difference (*p<0.05) with free DC (TIR = 71.30%), and highly significant difference (***p <0.001) with D-DIV/C (TIR = 47.70 %).
highly significantp =0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When the correlation of the calculated clinical scores of the patients was evaluated, there was a statistically highly significant linear relationship between the HAI score and FIB-4 and APRI scores in the positive direction with weak strength (r=0.23 and p =0.001; r=0.19 and p =0.006, respectively).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Serum E1S showed a decrease in postmenopausal women with malignant breast tu- mors compared to those with benign breast tumors (P < 0.02) without any significant difference was found among the premenopausal groups. Estriol (E3) was only significantly increased during the luteal phase in women with malignantbreast tumors than their corresponding women with benign breast tumors (P < 0.05). Remarkably, over all the three different populations, Testosterone (T) showed a highly significant decrease in women with malignant breast tumors (P < 0.001 for follicular; P < 0.05 for luteal and P < 0.005 for postmenopausal respectively) (Table 3).
highly significantp ≤ 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Genotypic Variation and General and Specific Combining Ability Analyses Under each and across the research conditions, G, E, GEI, set (groups of five inbred lines with different genetic backgrounds, each serving as both a male in one set and as a female parent in another set), and set by E interactions were highly significant ( p ≤ 0.001 ) for GY and other traits ( Table 1 and Table 2 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A one-way ANOVA revealed a highly significant difference across groups ( F (3,68) = 211.02, p < 0.001, BF 10 > 100), with post hoc tests revealing that this was due to the two conditions with Laser triggering a similar number of withdrawals ( t = 1.91, p = 0.23, BF 10 = 1.09) that was significantly higher than that for the two conditions without laser (all t s > 16.80, all p s < 0.001, all BF 10 s > 100), which in turn were similar ( t = 0.30, p = 0.990, BF 10 = 0.34).
highly significantp < .0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
biomarker glycemic control insulin resistance obesity skeletal muscle echo intensity ultrasound National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases 10.13039/100000062 DK133298 DK131724 Skeletal MEI There was a highly significant difference in mean deltoid MEI values between the obesity group (82.39 ± 28.32) and the healthy, lean group (33.41 ± 6.21) ( p < .001), with a mean difference of 48.98, representing a 146.6% increase relative to the lean group (Figure 2 ).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In this line, the contractile response to PE was tested and both compounds significantly reduced the contractile response to PE, although oxime–1 showed a more highly significant ( p < 0.001) reduction of the contractile response to different concentrations of PE (10 −7 to 10 −5 M).