“highly significant”

Post-hoc analysis showed a highly significant difference in iron (p = 0.001) and calcium (p < 0.001) levels in osteolytic tissues compared to non-osteolytic tissues.

3 a), whereas there was a highly significant effect of treatment in the sub-colony exposed to tourists (treatment, F 2,20 = 9.53, P = 0.001).

Poorly differentiated tumors occurred in significantly older patients, which was highly significant (p < 0.001).

The chi-square test demonstrated a highly significant association (p=0.001), and logistic regression analysis revealed an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 5.03.

Baseline CCQ was a strong and highly significant predictor (β = −0.602, p < 0.001), indicating that higher initial CCQ scores were associated with greater improvement (i.e. larger decreases in CCQ) at follow-up.

Upon examining the association of TAMs with OSCC, it was observed that, intriguingly, the number of TAMs decreased with increasing OSCC grade, demonstrating a highly significant difference ( P < 0.001) [ Table 1 ; Figures 1 and 2 ].

For all three radiation modalities the CT-induced increase in average DSB FPC values over that of the sham irradiated samples was highly significant (p < 0.001).

Results and Discussion As shown in Table 1 phosphorus treatment (P) and location (LON) had highly significant effects on the measured variable ( P < 0.001).

The covariance between “age” and “riding experience” is found highly significant by C.R. test ( P < 0.001).

Interestingly, there was a highly significant difference between the Loc PCA cases and the serum levels of the patients with metastatic disease ( P <0.001).

A highly significant positive correlation was found ( P < 0.001) ( r = 0.768 and 0.932 respectively) and ( P < 0.001) ( r = 0.905 and 0.951) in active and inactive group respectively However, when we studied the correlations between IOP GAT and CCT in both groups, the correlation was insignificant between both groups ( P = 0.08 and r = 0.280) and ( P = 0.4478 and r = 0.124) in active (A) and inactive (B) group respectively.

Results: We found a highly significant correlation between the HR measured with the Holter monitor and HR measured with 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (r = 0.77, p < 0.001).

Age was significantly associated with occupation (p = 0.027), while all other demographic variables exhibited highly significant associations with occupation (p < 0.001), as shown in Table 1 . 3.2.

HR resulted in highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) among all the measurements except between the fifth (post RLE 240°/s) and seventh (post LLE 180°/s) measurements.

Results The ANOVA revealed highly significant effects ( p < 0.001) of environment, genotype, and genotype × environment (G×E) interaction on the traits studied, indicating substantial variation due to each of these sources (Table 2 ).

We next tested whether participant clusters were distributed differently across the studies, after excluding those non-responses, and found highly significant differences (Chi-squared test; P-value < 0.001) ( Fig 2B ).

A repeated measures ANOVA of the wellbeing items (active; alert; excited; enthusiastic; happy; inspired) showed highly significant differences between the items, F(5,1555) = 52.68, p < 0.001; Bonferroni t -tests showed that the item ‘excited’ was significantly lower than the other five items, t(311) = 8.70, p < 0.001 for the smallest difference ( Figure 1 ).

CT: 23.0 ± 30.9%) was highly significant in both groups ( p =0.001), and similar changes were observed for the trunk flexors (WB-EMS: 17.6 ± 24.8% vs.

In the control group, there was a highly significant difference in NDI 19 ± 12 to 9 ± 11 (p<0.001); UEFI from 67 ± 0% to 73 ± 6% (p<0.005); and RMDQ 29 ± 15 to 20.08 ± 9.00 (p<0.005).

The study group demonstrated a mean (SD) suturing time of 3.809±0.253 minutes, compared to 6.923 ± 0.438mins in the control group suture length was 15.867 ± 0.617cm in Group I compared to 23.667 ± 1.253cm in Group II The difference in suturing time and length of suture material was highly significant between the study and control group (p value < 0.001) ( Table 4 ).

When perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy in dieting and self-efficacy in exercise were regressed against BMI, the model was highly significant (P<0.001).

Supra-threshold assessment The repeated measures MANOVA on subjective ratings revealed that the concentration of SO 2 has a highly significant effect on all of the ratings (p < .001) with higher ratings at high concentrations.

Importantly, Lactobacillus , Ruminococcus , Prevotella , Pseudomonas , Petrimonas , Dekkera , Kazachstania , Pseudeurotium , and Monascus exhibited an LDA ≥ 5, indicating that these microbes were responsible for the highly significant microbial differences ( p = 0.001) in the PM ( Cai et al., 2022 ). 3.3.

Anti-TPO antibody positivity was markedly higher in the SCH group (46.3%) than in the euthyroid group (13.9%), and this association was highly significant (p<0.001).

The HMR model for intentions to sterilise semi-owned dogs in the future was highly significant F(9, 48) = 11.45, p < 0.001.