“highly significant”

KEYWORDS agricultural soil autotrophic microorganism carbon fixation potential community structure RubisCO activity Regions with highly significant ( P < 0.001, Table 1 ) effects were detected for the Ace, Chao1, Shannon, Simpson, and Goods coverage indices of the cbbL gene.

Despite these correlations, three of the variables were highly significant in the full model (P < 0.001), and excluding the two that were not (slope and mean temperature; P > 0.7) did not substantially change their coefficients or standard errors.

For RT, a highly significant main effect of stimulus type was observed [ F (2,34) = 14.53, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.46].

All models maintained mean FA/24 h values ≤0.002, more than two orders of magnitude below the clinical limit, with highly significant equivalence ( p < 0.001 ).

There is a strong and highly significant correlation between genetic and geographic distances when all populations are analyzed (Mantel test R = 0.73, p<0.001; S2 Fig ).

Although the OS showed a borderline different baseline ( p = 0.04) compared with the right eye, PF-timolol demonstrated a highly significant increase in TBUT for both eyes ( p = 0.001) from baseline, confirming the ocular surface improvement.

A highly significant main effect of Stimulus Type was also observed ( F (1,67) = 288.092, p < .001, η p 2 = .81), with a higher mean frequency of switches in the feature condition ( M = 7.53, SEM = .26, 95% CI [7.00, 8.05]) compared to the conjunction condition ( M = 2.29, SEM = .25, 95% CI [1.79, 2.79]).

There was a highly significant positive Spearman’s rank correlation between serum and saliva scores ( ρ = 0.75, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3 ).

Nonetheless, the double interaction [Zeitgeber time × treatment] was highly significant (Three-Way ANOVA; P < 0.001).

The difference was found to be highly significant with the random model for total TGF-β2 (p<0.001), but not for active TGF-β2 (p=0.21).

The analysis revealed highly significant linear, F (1, 48) = 37.250, p < .001, η 2 = .437, and quadratic trends, F (1, 48) = 15.065, p < .001, η 2 = .239, indicative of learning across trials.

A one-way within-subjects analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a highly significant effect of condition on intelligibility, F (7, 161) = 40.187, p < .001, η p 2 = 0.636.

This was reflected in a highly significant mask-by-congruency interaction ( F (1, 19) = 45.32, p < .001, η 2 = .71, JZS Bayes factor: > 500).

Similarly, girls reporting menstrual morbidities were more likely to experience moderate and severe anemia (45.5%) compared to those without morbidities (21.2%), a difference that was also highly significant (p < 0.001).

Patterns in genetic diversity Global population differentiation was highly significant using all SNPs (global F ST = 0.0068, 95% CI [0.005, 0.0105]; global genic differentiation test, p < 0.001), although clustering analyses with ADMIXTURE provided the strongest support for the model with a single underlying population (Fig C in S1 File ).

Highly significant proportion of women in the intervention areas than in control areas reported antenatal care visits during pregnancy (92% vs 76%, p < .001), uptake of TT vaccination during pregnancy (67% vs 47%, p < .001) and delivery conducted at health facility (85% vs 71%, p < .001) at end line.

The Bartlett test had a highly significant value ( p < 0.001, indicating correlations among variables (“words”) and scenes.

Electron microscopy of 800 spinal axons (400 hypoxic, 400 normoxic, 100 axons per animal) left and right of the anterior median fissure from adult hypoxic and normoxic animals and subsequent data analysis (Sigma Plot) indicated a) absence of the Normality criterion for the data distribution ( Shapiro-Wilk Test ) and b) highly significant differences in the g-ratios as well as axon diameters between the hypoxic and normoxic group with p< 0.001 (each) using the Mann-Whitney Rank Sum Test and the Kruskal-Wallis One Way Analysis of Variance on Ranks .

of SVP orally (acting as the positive control), demonstrated a highly significant increase in STC (p < 0.001) compared to the control group.

There was a highly significant effect of floor pattern orientation on the extent of veering, F(6.8,139.9) = 21.733, p<.001, partial η 2 = .486, observed power = 1.00.

One-way ANOVA (SES group) calculated at the end of each school year showed a highly significant SES effect from grade I to grade III ( p < 0.001), a moderate significant effect ( p = 0.016) at grade IV, and no effect at grade V ( p = 0.245).

The results show that E-homework has a moderate and highly significant positive effect on students’ assignment performance ( g = 0.368, SE = 0.057, 95% CI [0.257, 0.479], z = 6.514, p < 0.001), with almost no heterogeneity among studies ( Q = 8.423, df = 9, p = 0.492, I 2 = 0.000), indicating that E-homework has a stable and consistent promoting effect on students’ assignment performance.

There was a statistically highly significant relationship between birth cohort and change in BMI (p<0.001).

The differences in disease-free survival (DFS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were highly significant (DFS: p < 0.001; MSS: p < 0.001; Figure 5B ).

The SiNPs-25 mg/kg group shows a significant increase (p < 0.01) while the SiNPs-100 mg/kg group exhibits a highly significant increase (p < 0.001).