“highly significant”

Regarding vine row, only 5 variables selected by the RF model were significantly different between treatments, and TN was the only soil variable with a highly significant difference (F = 10.82, p < 0.001) (Fig. 3 C).

Principal component analysis revealed highly significant response differences to the playback of raven calls compared to the calls from control species (Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Test: p < 0.001).

Significant differences are indicated using the standard Michelin Guide scale ( P < 0.05, significant; P < 0.01, highly significant; P < 0.001, extremely significant).

For Place of Articulation , a highly significant main effect was found across all three CLMMs (unaspirated: χ 2 (2) = 21.87, p < 0.001; aspirated: χ 2 (2) = 47.38, p < 0.001; fricatives: χ 2 (2) = 25.98, p < 0.001).

A highly significant and robust positive correlation ( r = 0.946, P < 0.001) was observed between publication productivity in various fields regarding CKD and productivity specifically focused on CKD and malnutrition.

There was a highly significant differences between the patients age and ceftazidime ( P < 0.001); a significant differences between the sample type and PFGE ( P > 0.95) and low significant differences between the sample type and DiversiLab ( P < 0.001).

For all statistical analyses, P <0.05 was considered statistically significant, P <0.01 was highly significant, and P <0.001 was considered statistically very highly significant.

The results of univariable Cox regression with RCS showed the HR was approximately close to one until 1.3 of VR and a highly significant positive correlation between VR and HR was presented from the onset of 1.3 of VR (HR = 1.05 per 0.1 increase, 95% CI [1.04–1.07], p < 0.001) (Fig. 2 c).

Highly significant proportion of women in the intervention areas than in control areas reported antenatal care visits during pregnancy (92% vs 76%, p < .001), uptake of TT vaccination during pregnancy (67% vs 47%, p < .001) and delivery conducted at health facility (85% vs 71%, p < .001) at end line.

Similarly, the main effect of correction was highly significant, F (2, 149) = 68.309, p < .001, η 2 = 0.478.

There was only a small decrease in the magnitude of the association between the FPDS and the mean WDDS-10 (from β = 0.10 to β = 0.09), but the association remained highly significant ( P < 0.001; Table 3 , B models).

We also observe that among models with high R 2 (presumed to be well modeled based on the training data), we see highly significant correlation of imputed and measured expression, with a substantial number of genes with correlation P < 1e-3 ( Supplementary Material, Fig.

This difference in yield is very highly significant (P< 0.001).

Moreover, in all types of polyps, significant differences between the types of epithelium were detected in our study in hyperplastic polyps (P=0.025) and highly significant differences in allergic and fibroinflammatory polyps (P<0.001).

The mean and standard deviations were compared using Students' t-test with the following statistical criteria: p<0.05, significant; p<0.01, highly significant; p<0.001 extremely significant.

The type of place of residence was highly significant ( p < 0.001), with rural [26.3%, 95% CI: 21.5%, 31.8%] and refugee [42.5%, 95% CI: 28.9%, 57.3%] populations showing higher malaria prevalence compared to urban areas [7.0%, 95% CI: 3.7%, 12.9%].

These assays also presented highly significant ( p < 0.001) AUC values, when participants with vaccinations were detected among the entire study group with different levels of exposure (Fig. 4 ).

The p -values were highly significant ( p = 0.001) when the impulses were compared between pre- and post-joint anesthesia in the horses scoring 2/5 and 3/5.

Here, we found highly significant ( p < 0.001) improvement in all areas and a large effect size > 0.5 with Spearman’s ρ ranging between 0.6 and 0.7, which we calculated as our measure of effect size.

For perindopril, seasonal variations did not reach statistical significance in the analysis of the original time series (χ 2 = 5.52, p > 0.05); however, after removing the upward trend (τ = 0.762), seasonality became highly significant (χ 2 = 68.9, p < 0.001), indicating a masking effect of the trend.

When the DOX concentration was 175 ng/mL, there was a significant difference with the control group (p ≤ 0.05); when the concentration was 350 ng/mL, there was a highly significant difference with the control group (p ≤ 0.001).

Our results showed that the relationship between the field measured defoliation and through UAS multispectral images with ITDe or MCDe was highly significant (p-value<0.001), and that the model’s predictive accuracy was very high in both cases (R 2 = 0.91 for ITDe and R 2 = 0.93 for MCDe). 4.

Roc-curve of hysteroscopy usage to predict diagnosis; adenomyosis sensitivity was 73.33% and specificity 95.29% and fibroid sensitivity was 73.33% and specificity was 97.65%. Both groups of therapy revealed; highly significant decrease in follow up menorrhagia in continuous Norethindrone group ( P < 0.001).By using ROC-curve analysis; Norethindrone administration predicted decreased menorrhagia pain with AUC was 0.973.

Conversely, the direct effect of counselling-based accommodations on psychological safety was positive and highly significant ( β = 0.27, SE = 0.05, Z = 5.40, p < 0.001), with a confidence interval of [0.17, 0.38].

The difference between the mean bleeding time after placebo and after aspirin was highly significant (p < 0.001) [ 20 ].