“highly significant”

All interactions (V × t2, V × t2 2 , V 2 × t2, V 2 × t2 2 ) were highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 5 ), with emphasis on the V × t2 2 interaction ( F = 34112.14) and V 2 × t2 2 interaction ( F = 16,285.38).

The PLS-DA-based analysis demonstrated a good predictive (Q 2 > 0.5), highly significant ( p < 0.001) and highly sensitive and specific (> 99%) prediction model to discriminate between patients with unfavorable and favorable outcomes using a serum metabolic biosignature on day 4 obtained by DI/LC–MS/MS (Table 3 and Fig. 2 ).

The analysis revealed a highly significant main effect for both stroke technique (F (3, 4586) = 43.67, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.0278) and expertise level (F (1, 4586) = 33.92, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.0073).

Combined analysis revealed highly significant effects of genotype (GEN, p < 0.001) and location (LOC, p < 0.001) in both 2022 and 2023 ( Table 1 ), indicating consistent differences among the 182 genotypes and between sites, the Experimental Station of the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, UNNE (hereafter ESF), and the INTA Mercedes Experimental Station (hereafter MES).

Effects of Different Cover Crop Management Models on Citrus Traits Regarding leaf physiological traits, both Cl and N content exhibited highly significant responses to the treatments ( p < 0.001) ( Figure 5 A,B).

Intrinsic Motivation (IM) and the Effect of VE The model for IM was highly significant, F (3, 130) = 14.62, p < 0.001, and demonstrated strong explanatory power, accounting for 25.2% of the variance in performance improvement (R 2 = 0.252).

Seasonal distribution showed a moderate and highly significant variation across years ( p < 0.001; Cramér’s V = 0.250), representing the strongest association.

(2A5-6), with highly significant differences in the IP group in relation to the SP group (*** p <0.001) and the SD group (# # # p <0.001) as shown in Fig. 1 .

The Chi-square test was highly significant refuting the null hypothesis of an equal distribution of visitors among treatments (χ 2 (0.05,2) = 50.1, P<0.001, two tail test).

Specifically, EC exhibited highly significant negative correlations ( p < 0.001) with soil aggregate stability indices (R 0.25 , MWD and GMD), while TP showed highly significant positive correlations ( p < 0.001) with these indices, indicating a distinct positive synergistic effect.

In the mixed plantations, the fungi established highly significant positive path correlations with both the nitrogen and phosphorus cycling genes (r = 0.345, r = 0.542, p < 0.001), paths that were entirely non-significant in the pure stands, confirming that fungi are the core force driving phosphorus turnover in mixed systems.

The Wilks’ lambda statistic indicated highly significant differences between groups when both functions were considered (λ = 0.228 and p < 0.001).

Biological activity It was found that the differences between the samples were statistically highly significant (ANOVA p -value < 0.001).

We observed a moderate and highly significant ( r = 0.55, p < 0.001) correlation of the PSS-14 score between t 1 and t 2 ; therefore, the mean value of the two time points was used for the statistical analysis.

In addition, nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis tests were performed across multiple feature representations, including raw conductance, temperature, proportional adjustment, and adaptive scaling, consistently yielding highly significant differences ( p < 0.001 ).

A one-way MANOVA on five quantitative leaf traits (55 individuals: 15 Ilex lanceifolia , 20 Ilex xiaojinensis , 20 Ilex peiradena ) revealed a highly significant species effect (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.086, F 10,96 = 23.22, p < 0.001), confirming that the three species are morphologically distinct.

As shown in Table 2 and Table 3 , the model was highly significant ( p < 0.001), whereas the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05), indicating that the quadratic model adequately described the experimental data.

Effects of Grazing on Community-Level Plant Hydraulic Traits Grazing had a highly significant ( p < 0.001) effect on the community-weighted mean (CWM) of six out of the seven hydraulic traits measured; only CWM_C leaf was not significantly affected.

Statistical analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis test revealed a highly significant difference among treatments (χ 2 (4) = 77.7, p < 0.001) ( Figure 4 ).

There was a highly significant difference in the mean age of participants across the groups ( p < 0.001).

Trend changes observed in some of the control departments were smaller, and the difference between trend changes in the medical service and those in control departments were highly significant for overall use and cephalosporin use reductions (p < 0.001) as well as for the increasing use of penicillins (p < 0.001).

We found highly significant differences between the groups in age, total bilirubin levels, direct bilirubin levels, G6PD activity, red blood cell counts and hemoglobin concentrations ( p < 0.001).

Overall, 72.5% of participants in the intervention group initiated pharmacotherapy, compared with only 28.1% in the control group, showing a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) between the groups.

Preterm labor was present in 48.2% of the cases as compared to 14.1% of the controls, and the difference was highly significant ( P <0.001). 54.7% mothers in the case group and 31.8% of the mothers in the control group had normal parturition, while other mothers delivered through a caesarean section.

Chi-square test confirmed a highly significant correlation between injury location and gender ( P < 0.001, Table 1 ).