Highly significant ( p < 0.001) unstandardized path coefficientsmark the strong relationships that exist between agricultural features and a particular food security aspect ( Table 4 , Table 5 , Table 6 , Table 7 ).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The main effect of dye type was highly significant ( F 3 , 24 = 65.86, p < 0.001), indicating that different dyes exhibited varying degrees of removal efficiency.
Pearson correlation analysis showed a highly significant positive correlation between NLR and CPAR ( P < .001, r = 0.530).
In the subsequent mixed-measures ANOVA across all eight measurement points, we found a highly significant main effect for time, F (2.62, 139.02) = 66.21, p < .001, η 2 p = .555 [0.495; 0.593].
A highly significant concentration of Fe, Ni, Cr, Zn, Cd, Hg and Pb was recorded in the cancer samples when compared with the control group (p ≤ 0.001).
The difference between the three groups in terms of convexity reduction was highly significant (ANOVA P <0.001).
The effect of temperature was highly significant with lower temperature resulting in higher adult L. bostrychophila counts (t = −5.763, p<0.001).
The difference was highly significant (Wilcoxon signed-rank test: p < 0.001).
The difference between glypican-1 expression of the two tumor types was highly significant ( p value < 0.001).
Export was not statistically meaningful in Model 5 but highly significant in Model 6 ( p < 0.001).
Recovery and stress within the AVEM patterns The examination of both the main scales of stress and recovery as well as their subscales showed highly significant differences between individuals in the AVEM A and B risk pattern groups and the AVEM G and S health pattern groups ( p < 0.001).
However, sampling location was highly significant (p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).
The crude associations between DMA and health outcomes are statistically highly significant (1.188 ≤ odds ratio ≤ 1.744; p < .001).
HMO-induced expansion of Phocaeicola and reductions in Lacrimispora is associated with reduced faecal acetate and butyrate levels A highly significant negative correlation was found between the relative abundance of Phocaeicola and Lacrimispora (Fig. 7A , Rho = −0.614 , P < .001, Spearman's rank correlation).
ANOVAs applied to latencies, with Condition ( unrelated , far , close ) as a fixed variable, showed a highly significant effect of Condition by participants, F 1(2, 126) = 9.07, MSE = 12028, p < 0.001, which was marginally significant in the analysis by items, F 2(2, 30) = 2.85, MSE = 2456, p = 0.074.
The model revealed highly significant effects of Group, F (4, 448) = 27.63, p < .001, Sentence Type, F (3, 448) = 23.81, p < .001, and Sentence Type × Group interaction, F (12, 448) = 3.70, p < .001.
The omnibus test of moderators was highly significant (QM df=13 = 74.5, p ‐value < 0.001), suggesting that the included moderators explain significant variability in the model (Viechtbauer 2010 ).
The intergroup comparison showed a highly significant difference (Z = −4.189, P < 0.001) (Table 5 ).
There is a highly significant difference ( p <0.001) in trends of publications based on reach of journal per year.
In fact, the interaction between sex and AO was highly significant ( P =0.001); the association in girls was positive and among boys, negative ( Vorland et al., 2023 ).
The duration was statistically highly significant ( P < .001) ( Table 2 ).
A highly significant relationship between the extent of the pivot-shift phenomenon and side-to-side difference of internal rotation laxity could be demonstrated ( p < 0.001).
Comparison by 2-way ANOVA of circadian periods in PER1 and PER2 single-mutant mice, with and without Tau ( Per1- null n = 14, 13; Per2- null n = 10, 12), revealed a highly significant effect of Tau (F 1,80 = 1909, p < 0.001) but not of Per genotype (F 2,80 = 0.099, p = 0.91).
There was a highly significant trend in SMRs with a B(a)P index of exposure for lung cancer ( P < 0.001) and bladder cancer ( P < 0.001).
Results: Gasdermin D gene and protein expression showed a highly significant difference between the control and the two bladder cancer groups ( p < 0.001), as demonstrated by real-time PCR, western blotting and immunohistochemistry.